two dimensional screening a useful optimality condition
play

Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition A. Araujo 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition A. Araujo 1 , 2 S. Vieira 3 1 IMPA 2 FGV-RJ 3 IBMEC-RJ Jun 2012 Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 1 Outline We study a monopolistic screening problem


  1. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition A. Araujo 1 , 2 S. Vieira 3 1 IMPA 2 FGV-RJ 3 IBMEC-RJ Jun 2012 Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 1

  2. Outline • We study a monopolistic screening problem where the firm produces a single product and faces heterogeneous customers. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 2

  3. Outline • We study a monopolistic screening problem where the firm produces a single product and faces heterogeneous customers. • The customers’ preferences exhibit two dimensions of uncertainty, which are their private information. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 2

  4. Outline • We study a monopolistic screening problem where the firm produces a single product and faces heterogeneous customers. • The customers’ preferences exhibit two dimensions of uncertainty, which are their private information. • We will derive the necessary optimality conditions characterizing the level curves for the optimal quantity assignment function. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 2

  5. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  6. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. • The firm is a profit maximizing monopolist which produces a single product q ∈ R + . Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  7. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. • The firm is a profit maximizing monopolist which produces a single product q ∈ R + . • The firm does not observe ( a, b ) and has a prior distribution over Θ according to the differentiable density function f ( a, b ) > 0 . Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  8. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. • The firm is a profit maximizing monopolist which produces a single product q ∈ R + . • The firm does not observe ( a, b ) and has a prior distribution over Θ according to the differentiable density function f ( a, b ) > 0 . • The monopolist’s preference is given by Π( q, t ) = t − C ( q ) , where C ( q ) is a the cost function. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  9. Monopolist’s Problem Formally, the monopolist’s problem consists in choosing the contract ( q, t ) : Θ → R + × R that solves � 1 � 1 max Π( q ( a, b ) , t ( a, b )) f ( a, b ) dadb, ( Π ) q ( · ) ,t ( · ) 0 0 Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 4

  10. Monopolist’s Problem Formally, the monopolist’s problem consists in choosing the contract ( q, t ) : Θ → R + × R that solves � 1 � 1 max Π( q ( a, b ) , t ( a, b )) f ( a, b ) dadb, ( Π ) q ( · ) ,t ( · ) 0 0 subject to the individual-rationality constraints: v ( q ( a, b ) , a, b ) − t ( a, b ) ≥ 0 ∀ ( a, b ) ∈ Θ , (IR) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 4

  11. Monopolist’s Problem Formally, the monopolist’s problem consists in choosing the contract ( q, t ) : Θ → R + × R that solves � 1 � 1 max Π( q ( a, b ) , t ( a, b )) f ( a, b ) dadb, ( Π ) q ( · ) ,t ( · ) 0 0 subject to the individual-rationality constraints: v ( q ( a, b ) , a, b ) − t ( a, b ) ≥ 0 ∀ ( a, b ) ∈ Θ , (IR) and the incentive compatibility constraints: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } , ( a, b ) ∈ arg max ∀ ( a, b ) ∈ Θ . (IC) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 4

  12. Basic Ideas 1. From the incentive compatibility constraints, we derive a quasi-linear partial differential equation (PDE) for q ( a, b ) . Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 5

  13. Basic Ideas 1. From the incentive compatibility constraints, we derive a quasi-linear partial differential equation (PDE) for q ( a, b ) . 2. Using the method of characteristic curves, we get a new and convenient parametrization of the type space. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 5

  14. Basic Ideas 1. From the incentive compatibility constraints, we derive a quasi-linear partial differential equation (PDE) for q ( a, b ) . 2. Using the method of characteristic curves, we get a new and convenient parametrization of the type space. 3. In these new variables, we derive the optimality condition for the monopolist’s problem along the characteristic curve. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 5

  15. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  16. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  17. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  18. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  19. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) • Finally, using the Schwarz’s integrability condition Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  20. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) • Finally, using the Schwarz’s integrability condition t ab = t ba , Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  21. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) • Finally, using the Schwarz’s integrability condition t ab = t ba , we get the following partial differential equation (PDE): − v qb q a + q b = 0 . (3) v qa Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  22. Cauchy Initial Value Problem − v qb  q a + q b = 0 ,  v qa   (CP)   q | Γ = φ ( r ) .  • The idea is to prescribe the value of q ( · ) on Γ and then use the characteristic curves to propagate this information to the participation region. • In this sense, because Γ is a one-dimensional curve, we are reducing problem from two-dimensions to one. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 7

  23. Cauchy Initial Value Problem − v qb  q a + q b = 0 ,  v qa   (CP)   q | Γ = φ ( r ) .  • The idea is to prescribe the value of q ( · ) on Γ and then use the characteristic curves to propagate this information to the participation region. • In this sense, because Γ is a one-dimensional curve, we are reducing problem from two-dimensions to one. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 7

  24. Cauchy Initial Value Problem − v qb  q a + q b = 0 , Γ = { ( α 0 ( r ) , β 0 ( r )) }  v qa   (CP)   q | Γ = φ ( r ) .  • The idea is to prescribe the value of q ( · ) on Γ and then use the characteristic curves to propagate this information to the participation region. • In this sense, because Γ is a one-dimensional curve, we are reducing problem from two-dimensions to one. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 7

Recommend


More recommend