Transportation Asset Management Webinar Series Webinar 34 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transportation Asset Management Webinar Series Webinar 34 Integrating PM2 Targets with the TAMP Sponsored by FHWA and AASHTO Webinar 34 – October 10, 2018

FHWA-AASHTO Asset Management Webinar Series • This is the 34 th in a webinar series that has been running since 2012 • Webinars are held every two months, on topics such as off-system assets, asset management plans, asset management and risk management, and more • We welcome ideas for future webinar topics and presentations • Submit your questions using the webinar’s Q&A feature 1

Welcome • FHWA and the AASHTO Sub-Committee on Asset Management are pleased to sponsor this webinar • Sharing knowledge is a critical component of advancing asset management practice 2

PM2 Targets and the TAMP Where are we now? DOT PM2 DOT PM2 Target Reporting Setting Initial Complete TAMP TAMP Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2019 4

PM2 Targets and the TAMP Where are we now? DOT PM2 DOT PM2 Target Reporting Setting MPO PM2 Target Initial Complete Setting TAMP TAMP Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2019 3

Learning Objectives – Building working knowledge of key concepts and definitions relevant to transportation asset management – Beginning to apply this knowledge in the context of PM2 Targets and TAMPs to answer: • What approaches are agencies taking to coordinate PM2 Targets with the TAMP? • What benefits can my agency expect by better integrating PM2 target setting with the TAMP? • What are key lessons-learned for agencies as they move forward with developing their complete TAMPs? • SHARE LESSONS LEARNED, IDEAS, KNOWLEDGE!!! 4

Webinar Agenda 2:00 Webinar Introduction and Overview Steve Gaj (FHWA) Hyun-A Park (Spy Pond Partners, LLC) 2:10 Caltrans Target Setting Approach Michael Johnson (Caltrans) 2:30 Maryland Experience Meredith Hill (Maryland SHA) 2:50 Wyoming Integration of Pavement and Bridge Targets with the TAMP Martin Kidner (Wyoming DOT) 3:10 Q&A and Wrap Up 5

Caltrans Target Setting Approach Michael Johnson P.E. State Asset Management Engineer October 2018

California’s Regional Planning Partners • 18 Metropolitan Planning Organizations • 26 Regional Transportation Planning Agencies

California Pavement Inventory 2016 Total California Pavement Inventory 180,351 Road Miles (RM*) 402,466 Lane Miles (LM**) State Local 14,776 RM 165,574 RM 49,682 LM 352,784 LM State NHS Local NHS State Non-NHS Local Non NHS 8,458 RM 5,450 RM 6,319 RM 160,124 RM 13,033 LM = 26% State 36,649 LM = 74% State 19,427 LM = 6% Local 333,357 LM = 94% Local NHS Target Setting Note: *Road Miles (RM) is center lane miles ** Lane Miles (LM) represents the measures for the NHS Source: 2016 HPMS Data Bridge and Pavement Target Setting Workshop | Slide 3

California Bridge Inventory 2017 Total California NBI Inventory 24,868 Bridges Deck Area – 325,870 KSF* State Local 12,413 Bridges 12,455 Bridges Deck Area – 252,566 KSF Deck Area – 73,304 KSF Local Non NHS State Non-NHS State NHS Local NHS* 10,826 Bridges 3,217 Bridges 9,196 Bridges 1,629 Bridges Deck Area= 68% Local Deck Area= 17% State Deck Area=83% State Deck Area= 32% Local NHS Target Setting Source: National Bridge Inventory (NBI) bridges Note: NHS Targets are required on NBI bridges, non-NBI bridges excluded Note: There are over 250 Local Agency owners of NHS bridges of which 87% own less than 10 bridges *Deck area in thousand square feet (KSF) Bridge and Pavement Target Setting Workshop | Slide 4

Target Setting Approach 1. Identify the inventory and current condition of NHS pavements and bridges 2. Solicit expected 2 and 4 year targets from all NHS owners 3. Use a quantity weighted approach to develop a statewide targets

Click to edit Master title style Example Calculation

Summary • Caltrans solicited MPO input before establishing targets • State of California targets reflect each agencies expectations • The approach is transparent and inclusive

MARYLAND’S NHS ASSET MANAGEMENT Ms. Meredith Hill, Performance Planner

• MDOT & the System • NHS in Maryland • Targets and Projections • Delivering the Final TAMP • MDOT Asset Management • Lessons Learned

ABOUT OUR (MDOT SHA) SYSTEM

SYSTEM PRESERVATION TRADEOFFS MDOT SHA Program Access Controls ADA Retrofit Million Bicycle Retrofit Actual Projected $1,000 Bridge Replace & Rehab. Capital Equipment Other CHART $900 Communications Pavement and Bridges Commuter Action Improvements $800 Crash Prevention Drainage $700 Emergency Enhancements Environmental Compliance $600 Environmental Preservation Guardrail End Treatment $500 Intersection Capacity Neighborhood Conservation $400 Noise Barriers Park-n-Ride Pedestrian Access to Transit $300 Railroad Crossings Railroad Safety & Spot $200 Rest Areas & Information Centers Resurfacing & Rehabilitation Safety & Spot $100 Sidewalks Statewide Planning & Research $0 TMDL Compliance 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Traffic Management Urban Reconstruction

NHS IN MARYLAND NHS Owners • MDOT SHA • MDOT MAA • MDTA • ACoE • NPS • Counties • Municipalities • Parks Commission Partners • FHWA MD Division Office • MPOs

DEVELOPING THE NHS STORY Bridges Pavement • MDOT SHA submits NBIS for non-federal • MDOT SHA collects all I&C information for structures, only. the directional lane miles of the NHS, regardless of ownership • Has historical records for non-federal • Has historical records for IRI, cracking, structures faulting, & rutting • Mature BMS capable of reasonable non- • Mature PMS capable of reasonable federal condition projections condition projections

PERFORMANCE PROJECTIONS - BRIDGES http://arcg.is/1r04uH

PERFORMANCE PROJECTIONS - PAVEMENT

DELIVERING ON TPM AND TAM Data Collection Content Development Review Submission Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Early June • Leadership Directive • Building the Team • Increasing shared competencies • Data and Information • Incorporate vulnerability into management systems and project development • Balance increasing tradeoff realities with state of good repair practice and commitments

MDOT ASSET MANAGEMENT GOALS The Department Asset Management Program is focused on the following goals: 1. Know What We Own – Develop & Maintain Accurate Asset Inventory and Information Critical Infrastructure 2. Know What Condition Our Assets are In – Implement ✓ Pavement Conditioning Protocols & Track Maintenance/Costs ✓ Large Structures 3. Establish Plan for Maintaining a State of Good Repair – ✓ Rail Develop & Document Processes & Procedures ✓ Tunnels 4. ✓ Facilities Commit to Asset Management Practices – Educate and Train Workforce in AM Practices ✓ Vehicle Fleet & Equipment 5. Develop a Framework & Guidance for Asset Management ✓ IT Systems Software 6. Integrate Asset Management into How We Do Business

QUESTIONS Meredith Hill Performance Planner MDOT SHA, Innovative Performance Planning Division http://data.imap.maryland.gov/pages/mdot / 410-545-8739 mhill8@sha.state.md.us http://arcg.is/1r04uH

Wyoming Integration of Pavement and Bridge Targets with TAMP Martin Kidner State Planning Engineer, WYDOT

Critical Communication • How fast can you change the needle? • Will your funding change predictably? • How do you handle inflation? 10/10/18 Buckle up 2

Space-Time Continuum • Understand time from decision to reporting. – Legislature provides new funds (July 2009) – Contracts let (August 2009) – Crushing and paving (Summer 2010) – Measure (NHS every other year, 2011) – Report to HPMS (April 2012) • “instant” reaction is a three year delay 10/10/18 Buckle up 3

Construction and Contract Maintenance History 10/10/18 Buckle up 4

Effects of inflation, constant funding scenario Non-Interstate NHS Condition Projections 4% Inflation Rate 100% 90% Good + 80% Excellent Target 70% 60% 50% 40% 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 Year 10/10/18 Buckle up 5

Treatments are not system wide • We are treating about 10% of the interstate pavements per year • The change in condition is relatively slow Don’t Fall Behind 10/10/18 Buckle up 6

10 year projection begins to indicate the condition of long life assets 10/10/18 Buckle up 7

So What? • 2 year outcomes are already in the pipeline • 4 year targets don’t adequately show the trends • Assets are long lived, and need to project longer term. How do we indicate compliance with the TAMP? 10/10/18 Buckle up 8

Output versus Outcome • Output example: dollars spent on pavement treatment. • Outcome example: number of 0.1 mile segments changed from poor to good with the lowest life cycle cost. 10/10/18 Buckle up 9

Management Systems • Wyoming’s management system indicates miles of light, medium, and heavy (1S, 2S, 3S) pavement treatment per system type • Track committed projects by system, type of treatment, and validates locations 10/10/18 Buckle up 10