TOWN HALL MEETING A meeting to discuss the status of the A meeting to discuss the status of the Kansas City Metropolitan School District and next steps Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Fourth Cycle Classification Schedule Fourth Cycle Classification Schedule 2 Previous Cycles Previous Cycles Fourth Cycle Fourth Cycle Classification Year: Fourth Cycle: Annual Performance Report A l P f R t Performance ↓ + Determines Review Type Resource ↓ ↓ + Review (Process + Resource) Process (Review) ↓ = Regional School Improvement Team Accreditation ↓ Performance = Accreditation
Fourth Cycle Accreditation Levels 3 K-12 Districts K-8 Districts Unaccredited Unaccredited 0 5 Mets 0-5 Mets 0 3 Mets 0-3 Mets Provisional 6-8 Mets 4 Mets Accredited A dit d 9 14 M t 9-14 Mets 5 7 M t 5-7 Mets A district must meet at least one MAP standard to be provisionally accredited
History of KCMSD Accreditation 4
1st Cycle MSIP 1990-1996 5 On-site Review – (Part 1) April 2-4, 1991 •Classification: AAA On-site Review – (Part 2) March 9-11, 1993 yvutsronmlihfedcaYUTSRPONMLKIFEDCA Concerns: Instructional climate Student achievement Graduation rate Teacher/administrator certification •Classification: •Classification: Provisionally Accredited Provisionally Accredited
2nd Cycle MSIP 1996-2001 6 On-site Technical Assistance Review – December 9-11, 1997 Concerns: Student Performance, Comprehensive School Improvement Plan, Professional Development, Instability in leadership On-site Review – January 12-14, 1999 Concerns: Course offerings and teacher certification Governance and Administration 0 of 11 Performance Standards Met 0 f 11 P f St d d M t •Classification: Unaccredited – effective May 1, 2000 yvutsronmlihfedcaYUTSRPONMLKIFEDCA Re-Review – January 22-23 , 2002 Continued Concern: Teacher certification, governance and administration noted as making progress continued areas of concern 4 of 11 Performance Standards Met •Classification: Classification: Provisionally Accredited Provisionally Accredited
3rd Cycle MSIP 2001-2006 7 On-site Review – January 12-16, 2004 y , Concerns: Student achievement in grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-11, ACT, dropout rate and graduation rate and special education; Teacher Certification; LMC; state and federal IDEA Teacher Certification; LMC; state and federal IDEA compliance; safety regulations •Classification: Provisionally Accredited
3 rd CYCLE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR) District Name: Kansas City 33 County District Code: 048078 8 Third Cycle MSIP Standards 2001 (00-01) APR 64 performance points ( provisional) 2002 (01-02) APR 64 performance points ( provisional) 2003 (02-03) APR 111 overall/64 performance points ( provisional) 2004 (03-04) APR 55 performance points ( provisional) 2005 (04-05) APR 64 performance points ( provisional ) 3 rd Cycle ( K-12) Overall Minimum from Performance Accredited >106 >66 Provisionally Accredited >83 >46 (9 pts must be earned in one of the MAP grade spans or reading levels) Unaccredited <83 <46 (or no points earned in MAP grade spans or reading levels)
4th Cycle MSIP 2006-present 9 Scheduled Classification Year: 2008-2009
Performance Findings - 2007 10 Standard Concern 3-5 Math Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement 3-5 CA Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement 6-8 Math Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement 6-8 CA Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement 9-11 Math 9-11 CA 9 11 CA Student Achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Student Achievement not high and not showing sufficient improvement ACT Percent scoring above national average - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Adv. Courses Status of percent of students taking courses is average, below average, or declining CTE Courses Status of percent of students taking courses is average, below average, or declining Percent enrolled in postsecondary education - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Postsec. Ed. Grad. Rate Status is average, below average, or declining g g g Subgroup District’s AYP subgroup achievement - not high and not showing sufficient improvement Data Corrections needed for CTE completers and attendance
On-site Review April 28 – May 1 and May 5-6 2008 April 28 May 1 and May 5 6, 2008 11 •Team of 235 Team of 235 •Visited 65 sites •C Conduct d ted d •1,821 classroom observations •187 Individual staff interviews •88 T 88 Teach her f focus groups •91 Student focus groups •1 Parent focus group •Reviewed •Advance Questionnaire Results •District Response to Standards Di t i t R t St d d •District Documentation
MSIP Review Team Findings 12 1) Stability of District Level Leadership Stability of District Level Leadership 1) 2) Role of the Local Board of Education 3) Curriculum K 12 Curriculum K-12 3) 4) Academic Rigor 5) S f Safe and Orderly Environment d O d l E i 6) Professional Development 7) Federal Programs Compliance 8) Program Evaluation (Review Date: April 28-May 1, 5-6, 2008)
4 th CYCLE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR) District Name: Kansas City 33 County District Code: 048078 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Met/Not Met et/ ot et Met/Not Met et/ ot et Met/Not Met et/ ot et Met/Not Met et/ ot et Met/Not Met et/ ot et Met/Not Met et/ ot et MSIP Standard/Indicator MSIP Standard/Indicator 13 9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Math Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 CA Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.1 3 9 1*3 MAP Grades 6 8 Mathematics MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 CA Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.1*5 MAP Grades 9-11 Mathematics Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.1 6 9 1*6 MAP Grades 9-11 CA MAP Grades 9 11 CA - Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Bonus MAP Achievement N/A Met Met Met Met Not Met Subject Area/EOC Bonus Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9 3 9.3 ACT ACT Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.4*1 Advanced Courses Met Met Met Met Met Met 9.4*2 Career Education Courses Met Met Met Met Met Met 9.4 3 College Placement 9.4*3 College Placement Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.4*4 Career Education Placement Not Met Met Met Met Met Met 9.5 Graduation Rate Not Met Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9 6 Attendance Rate 9.6 Attendance Rate Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 9.7 Subgroup Achievement Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Total Standards Met 3 5 4 4 4 3
State Law 14 2 Prior to or at the time any school district in this state 2. Prior to or at the time any school district in this state shall lapse, but after the school district has been classified as unaccredited, the department of elementary and secondary education shall conduct a public hearing at a location in the unaccredited school district The purpose of the hearing shall be to: district. The purpose of the hearing shall be to: (1) Review any plan by the district to return to accredited status; or status; or (2) Offer any technical assistance that can be provided to the district.
State Law (cont.) ) 15 3. Except as otherwise p provided in section 162.1100…the state board of education may appoint a special administrative board to supervise the financial operations, maintain and preserve the h fi i l i i i d h financial assets or, if warranted, continue operation of the educational programs within the district or of the educational programs within the district or what provisions might otherwise be made in the best interest of the education of the children of the district.
State Monitoring and Assistance Team 16 What should be the role of this Team and what What should be the role of this Team and what responsibilities should they have? What are the desirable characteristics of the people who serve on this Team? people who serve on this Team? Do you have any other suggestions? Do you have any other suggestions?
Questions? 17
Recommend
More recommend
