through sub sea gas systems
play

through sub-sea gas systems Dr. Uri Schattner Dept. of Marine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Climatic response to forced regressions through sub-sea gas systems Dr. Uri Schattner Dept. of Marine Geoscisnecs Charney School of Marine Sciences University of Haifa, Israel Posamentier and Morris, 2000 Climatic response to forced


  1. Climatic response to forced regressions through sub-sea gas systems Dr. Uri Schattner Dept. of Marine Geoscisnecs Charney School of Marine Sciences University of Haifa, Israel

  2. Posamentier and Morris, 2000

  3. Climatic response to forced regressions through sub-sea gas systems

  4. 2010 2012 2012

  5. R/V Shikmona Thanks to Giora Boxer John K. Hall Barak Herut Revital bookman Gal Hartman Ronnie Sade Orna Buch Arik Golan R/V Eziona DMG students Gideon Amit Support and funding: Charney School of Marine Sciences Margaret Kendrick Blodgett Foundation Paradigm Geophysical, Kingdom Suite, Schlumberger Petrel, ILDC and Modi ’ in Energy and GGR

  6. Multi-channel section – gas chimney Seismic attribute analysis: Seafloor Amplitude Similarity Schattner and Lazar, 2009

  7. Backscatter  suspected pockmarks Pockmarks? After Sade et al., 2006

  8. Bathymetry  suspected pockmarks ? 1000 m After Sade et al., 2006

  9. Data 5 VHR new surveys 4 MCS available surveys After Sade et al., 2006 After Schattner et al., 2006 Schattner et al., 2010

  10. Single channel survey configuration Hydrophone 6.3 m 0.3 m Sparker 3.0 m 4.6 m 1.6 m 0.9 m 30.0 m 0.6 m 1.2 m GeoSpark 200 sparker by GeoResources Sparker Hydrophone 0.9 m 7.2 m 37.4 m 37.4 m

  11. Data types Schattner et al., 2010

  12. Gas seeps – at ~75m depth Schattner et al., 2012

  13. Low cohesion – at ~35m depth Schattner et al., 2012

  14. Low cohesion Schattner et al., 2012

  15. Findings Seafloor 720 suspected pockmarks Active seeps – 3 consecutive years Low cohesion zone Subsurface Bright spots Gas masking  Gas front - ~72 km 2

  16. Widespread indications for cold seeps Schattner and Lazar, 2009

  17. Gas signature Climatic implications Reservoir / emission Permeability Path Lithology + conditions Source

  18. Schattner et al., 2012 Gas chimney 2 major unconformities

  19. Schattner et al., 2012 Gas chimney 2 major unconformities

  20. Mid Pleistocene unconformity Qishon Yam 1 Mid Pleistocene unconformity m Shallow neritic Two way time (Msec) Pleistocene Depth (m) Shelf Shallow neritic Plio-Pleistocene Pliocene m Senonian-Miocene 250 m Well interpretation – Derin, 2002 Harari, 2010, MSc

  21. Correlation between seismic markers – unconformities and sea level Mid Pleistocene transition Relative sea level (m) Time (1000xyears BP) After Paillard, 2006; Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005 Two way time (Msec) 1 km Harari, 2010, MSc

  22. Gas emission response to sea level change Sea level drop Wetland formation Possible Exposure source for organic matter Drainage channels Likely Channel incision correlation to glacial maxima Rapid channel fill Burial of organic rich sediments

  23. Gas emission response to sea level change Removal of Gas Warming release hydrostati c pressure Sea level drop Sea level rise (highstand) Seepage burial under water and sediments Relative sea level Seepage to atmosphere stops Negligible warming effect Lambeck and Chappell, 2001

  24. Exposure during LGM Schattner et al., 2010

  25. LGM negative climate feedback  The active gas system -- not unique to offshore Israel  It represents the usually underestimated marine methane contribution from mid-latitude continental shelves into sea water and maybe into the atmosphere.  Global warming and sea level rise induces a negative, restraining feedback for gas emission across mid- latitude continental margins

  26. Data 2D seismic reflection – time migrated 3D seismic reflection – pre-stack depth migrated Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  27. WNW ESE Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  28. Giant pockmark Formed on Messinian seafloor Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  29. Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  30. Base Messinian Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  31. Base Messinian over Jonah structure

  32. Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  33. Top Messinian Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  34. Top Messinian Lazar, Schattner and Reshef, 2012

  35. Mid-Messinian climatic shift Rouchy and Caruso, 2006

  36. Climate is not the direct cause of the Mediterranean desiccation

  37. Climate feedback Tectonic forces Messinian Salinity Crisis Isolation of Mediterranean Massive drop in sea level Exposure of seafloor Spontaneous gas emission Emission of gas to shallow sea and Warming  atmosphere Mid-Messinian climatic shift Increased runoff from Gas seepage land areas Terrigenous sediment continues as + supply + increased long as sea channel incision level is low Tectonic opening of Covers Gibraltar Major flood seafloor with water and sediments Stops emission to atmosphere

  38. Conclusions  Continental shelf – gas system active today  Basin – Messinian gas emission  Widespread seepage  Negative climatic feedback cycles  Shelf – LGM  Basin – Mid Messinian climatic shift  Climatic response to forced regressions through sub-sea gas systems

  39. Thank you

Recommend


More recommend