the sbs g en polarized 3 he experiment
play

The SBS G En polarized 3 He experiment Some history illustrating - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The SBS G En polarized 3 He experiment Some history illustrating the important physics being addressed. Some detail on the SBS GEn experiment. A few comments on the impact of the experiment. Gordon D. Cates January 31, 2020


  1. The SBS G En polarized 3 He experiment • Some history illustrating the important physics being addressed. • Some detail on the SBS GEn experiment. • A few comments on the impact of the experiment. Gordon D. Cates January 31, 2020 � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1

  2. Why is SBS (and G En ) so important? It’s useful to look at the history ….. 2

  3. The first Hall A polarized 3 He experiment (E02-013) Riordan et al., PRL vol. 105, pg 262302 (2010) 0.8 Passchier, NIKHEF Herberg, MAMI Ostrick, MAMI Meyerhoff, MAMI Golak, MAMI Bermuth, MAMI 0.6 Plaster, JLab Zhu, JLab Warren, JLab Glazier, MAMI M n Geis, BATES /G A1, Mainz (prelim) Published e ’ D, JLab Hall A (prelim) E n 0.4 Riordan G E02-013 Preliminary n in 2010 Preliminary µ point RCQM - Miller (2006) Diquark - Cloet π 0.2 VMD - Lomon (2005) DSE - Cloet (2010) F /F , = 300 MeV Λ 2 1 Our Fit 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2 2 Q [GeV ] Extended our knowledge of G En into the Q 2 range where the dramatic Q 2 behavior was discovered in G Ep 3

  4. The first Hall A polarized 3 He experiment (E02-013) Belitsky, Ji and Yuan, Riordan et al., PRL vol. 105, pg 262302 (2010) 0.8 logrithmic corrections Passchier, NIKHEF Herberg, MAMI - 2003 Ostrick, MAMI Meyerhoff, MAMI Golak, MAMI Bermuth, MAMI 0.6 Plaster, JLab Zhu, JLab Warren, JLab Glazier, MAMI M Miller’s RCQM - 2002 n Geis, BATES /G A1, Mainz (prelim) e ’ D, JLab Hall A (prelim) E n 0.4 Riordan G E02-013 Preliminary n Preliminary µ point RCQM - Miller (2006) Diquark - Cloet π Cloet, Eichmann, El- 0.2 VMD - Lomon (2005) DSE - Cloet (2010) Bennich, Kahn and Roberts F /F , = 300 MeV Λ 2 1 - DSE/Faddeev - 2009 Our Fit 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2 2 Q [GeV ] Extended our knowledge of G En into the Q 2 range where the dramatic Q 2 behavior was discovered in G Ep 4

  5. Multiple innovations were needed to measure G En to high Q 2 3 He(e,e’n)pp • Open geometry spectrometer: the first use of Big Bite with Polarized neutron 3 He target full tracking. detector • High luminosity polarized 3 He target, with a figure of merit more than 10x higher than E142 that measured the neutron spin structure. • The neutron detector was, I BigBite Beam (e - arm) believe the world’s largest at that time. 5

  6. With both proton and neutron FF data, it becomes possible to extract the individual quark contributions 0.3 u quark 0.2 q 2 F 4 Q -1 q κ 0.1 d quark 0.75 × 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Cates, de Jager, Riordan 1.0 and Wojtsekhowski, PRL u quark vol. 106, pg 252003 (2011) q 1 F 4 Q 0.5 d quark 2.5 × 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2 2 Q [GeV ] Distinctly different behavior was seen for the u- and d- quark contributions to the form factors 6

  7. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � A naive scaling argument suggested by Jerry Miller invokes diquarks u-quark scattering amplitude is dominated by scattering κ from the lone “outside” quark. × Two constituents implies 1/Q 2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 u quark q 1 F 4 Q 0.5 d quark 2.5 × 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2 2 Q [GeV ] d-quark scattering amplitude is necessarily probing inside the diquark. Two gluons need to be exchanged (or the diquark would fall apart), so scaling goes like 1/Q 4 While the above picture is over simplified, there is increasing theoretical support for the general idea being illustrated. 7

  8. DSE/Faddeev calculation of Q 4 F 1u and Q 4 F 1d u-quark d-quark arXiv:1103.2432v1 Cloët, Roberts and Wilson, using the QCD DSE approach, have made: “ ... a prediction for the Q 2 -dependence of u- and d-quark Dirac and Pauli form factors in the proton, which exposes the critical role played by diquark correlations within the nucleon.” 8

  9. Miller/Cloet relativistic constituent quark-diquark model with pion cloud While the above picture is over simplified, there is increasing theoretical support for the general idea being illustrated. 9

  10. So what will the SBS polarized 3 He G En experiment bring to this discussion 10

  11. � A measurement of G En /G Mn at high Q 2 provides excellent discrimination between different theoretical descriptions Light-front cloudy bag model An updated quark-diquark light-front Jerry Miller (PRC v66, pg032201, 2002) . cloudy bag model by Ian Cloët and Jerry Miller. 1.0 The QCD DSE model of Cloët, M n G Roberts et al. in which the / 0.5 n E G constituent quark mass is n dynamically generated and diquark degrees of freedom 0.0 are incorporated. (Few Body Systems v46, pg1 2009) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 2 Q [GeV ] Behavior becomes unambiguously different at high Q 2 . Interestingly only models incorporating diquarks agree well with the high-Q 2 data.

  12. Experimental setup for the SBS polarized 3 He G En experiment: E12-09-016 • The electron arm: Bigbite upgraded with GEMs • The neutron arm: the SBS magnet and the hadron calorimeter • Very-high luminosity polarized 3 He target. 12

  13. On the polarized 3 He targets 3 He is polarized by spin-exchange optical pumping Gas is circulated by driving convection, easily done by preferentially heating one “transfer tube” Beam goes through the bottom “target chamber” 13

  14. Increasing capability of polarized 3 He targets Hall C A 1n running right now • The blue bar labeled “Antoinette” shows the results of a bench test that served as an early proof- of-principle for the Hall C A 1n target cells. • The red dot, added to the figure from our paper, shows the actual in-beam performance in Hall C right now (at least on a good day!). 14

  15. Projected performance of the SBS G En polarized 3 He target The SBS G En target will have a figure of merit 2-3 times higher than the current A1n target. • The SBS target will be twice the size with a 50% longer target length. • The “pumping chamber” will be illuminated from two directions, which substantially improves performance 15

  16. The SBS polarized 3 He target • Will have a FoM nearly 100 times higher than used at SLAC for E-142. • Spectrally-narrowed high-power diode-laser arrays provide advantage over previous high-Q 2 polarized 3 He G En experiment. • Convection-driven target cells circulate polarized 3 He more quickly, allowing higher beam current (8uA -> 60uA) while maintaining high polarization of 60%. 16

  17. Engineering model for the G En setup Overview of G En target on the pivot. 17

  18. Closeup of the the target ladder Note ability to illuminate the target from two directions 18

  19. Internal view of the target Closeup emphasizing target ladder. 19

  20. The SBS polarized- 3 He G En experiment: projected results E12-17-004 (GEn-RP) 20

  21. SBS could help shape a qualitatively different picture of nucleon structure From the DOE Pulse Newsletter: A cartoon of the nucleon A not-very-scientifically guided from the lobby of JLab depiction of a nucleon with a diquark-like structure While this cartoon is WAY too simple, it illustrates how SBS might influence fundamental concepts of hadronic structure 21

  22. Summary • The SBS polarized 3 He G En experiment will dramatically increase the Q 2 range over which G En is known. • If the dramatic predictions of certain models are verified, it could profoundly affect our view of the nucleon. • There are great opportunities here for students and physicists at all levels, with much work to be done. Join us if you haven’t already! 22

  23. 23

Recommend


More recommend