THE (NEAR) FUTURE OF MOBILITY “Choice” as the paradigm of innovative mobility, Integration between static volumes and dynamic fmows Repubblica di San Marino Smart Mobility Forum 2017 Arch. Federico Cassani
A B O U T U S MIC | Mobility in Chain is a company founded in 2009 by Davide Boazzi, Federico Cassani and Federico Parolotto. The founders decided to open a new fjrm after 10 ears ina well- known transport planning fjrm where they were directors. MIC was founded on the belief that mobility infmuences the way we live and the quality of our lives. Also, MIC was created with the ambition of improving the quality of our lives through a profound understanding of how we move about. In line with their previous professional experience, MIC team is strongly focused on international work providing transport consultancy to developers, masterplanners and public bodies all over the world. MIC embraces an innovative and sustainable vision for mobility based on the following principles. The belief that town planning process should not be subject to the single minded pursuit of traffjc-driven approaches, and The new urbanism, which enhances compact, dense, mixed- use neighbourhoods that in addition set the right premises to enforce the original form of transport, walking, followed closely by cycling and public transport, as most favoured mode of movement. MIC peculiarity lies in the combination of the principles above with the understanding of the needs of the client and with the requirements of the public bodies dealing with every kind of transport issue ranging from traffjc-impact studies to civil engineering. www.michain.com
MOBILITY PATTERNS ARE MULTIPLYING Chongming, Shanghai, Accessibility Study 2017
MOBILITY: THE IMPORTANCE IN URBAN PLANNING
PUBLIC vs PRIVATE TRANSPORT T R P O U P B S L N I A C R T T R E A T N A V S I P R P O R T
PUBLIC vs PRIVATE TRANSPORT VS PRO: PRO: FLEXIBILITY DEMOCRATIC FREEDOM SUSTAINABLE LESS CONGESTION CONS: CONS: NO FLEXIBILITY CONGESTION NO FREEDOM MANY INFRASTRUCTURES EXPENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURES POLLUTION UNEFFICIENCY
PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROS CONS = 2 € DEMOCRATIC NO FLEXIBILITY A B passengers space (m2) vehicles fuel (lit) 5 2000 24000 250 NO 25 400 8800 120 CONGESTION 100 100 3400 50 175 50 2800 3 200 Demand/capacity transport 10’000 persons for 1km 180 160 140 120 100 80 Walk/Bike HIGH COSTS OF 60 Intercity bus 40 INFRASTRUCTURES Rail transit 20 Transit bus (3/4 full) 0 Carpool (3 occupants) LESS Transit bus (1/4 full) POLLUTION Car (solo driver) Underground cost - millions € /Km SUV (solo driver) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Pounds of CO2 (or equivalents) per passenger-mile
PRIVATE TRANSPORT PROS CONS FLEXIBILITY CONGESTION A B C SOx IPA NH 3 NMVOC FREEDOM POLLUTION PM 10 NOx CO 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Impact of road transport on the total emissions
FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY TO TEMPORARY OWNERSHIP MULTI MODAL SHARING T R P O U P B S L N I C A T R R T A E N T S A P V O I R R P T BENEFITS OF PRIVATE TRANSPORT WITHOUT OWNERSHIP ISSUES
DIGITAL MOBILITY O g g i lo sce nario di poss ibilità pe r s ce gl ie r s i come s pos t a r s i è va r i e g ato m a co m p l e sso / Tod ay the scen ario of poss ibil it ie s to choos e how to ge t a ro u n d i s d i ve r se b u t co m p l ex In futuro il proces s o dive r rà s e mpre più imme diato e f a c i l m e nte l e g ato a l l ’ u ti l i z zo d e g l i s m ar t pho ne / In th e fut ure t he proce s s w il l be come more i m m e d i ate a n d e a si l y l i n ke d to th e u se o f sm a r tp h o n e s
DIGITAL MOBILITY PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC Mass Sharing System car sharing parking system GPS navigation system bike sharing public car sharing transport car sharing
ENERGY GRIDS
URBAN PLANNING DENSITY &INTENSITY
URBAN PLANNING
THE FUTURE OF PLANNING
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Audi Urban Future Initiative 2015 Union Square
IED Milano November 2015 FLOW DESIGN
FLOW DESIGN
Può San Marino diventare un modello internazionale per l’accessibilità e la mobilità sostenibile? SAN MARINO AS AN INTERNATIONAL CHAMPION OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY?
Recommend
More recommend
