the environment of the most massive galaxies in the early
play

The environment of the most massive galaxies in the early universe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The environment of the most massive galaxies in the early universe in the light of the jet impact 5,75cm 100 kpc Background image: 4C 41.17, Z=3.8, composite (Michiel Reuland, www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~reuland) Martin Krause


  1. The environment of the most massive galaxies in the early universe in the light of the jet impact 5,75cm 100 kpc Background image: 4C 41.17, Z=3.8, composite (Michiel Reuland, www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~reuland) Martin Krause Landessternwarte Heidelberg-Königstuhl

  2. Overview 1)What kind of galaxy hosts a powerful radio source in the early universe (Z>2) and how many? 2)How does the IGM change by the jet impact? Hydrodynamic Simulations. 3)Is there a common mechanism for line absorbers in normal and radio galaxies?

  3. 1) What kind of galaxy hosts a powerful radio galaxy in the early universe (Z>2) and how many? • brightest galaxies at their redshift • large rotation measures • comoving space density of galaxy clusters at low redshift is comparable to space density of radio galaxies at high redshift • direct evidence by detection of some dozens of nearby emission line objects in five cases

  4. 1) What kind of galaxy hosts a powerful radio galaxy in the early universe (Z>2) and how many? • Radiogalaxies are located at the centers of protoclusters • All cluster centers were active at Z > 2

  5. ✓ ✟ � ✄ ✍ ✂ ✌ ✞ ✂ ☞ ✝ ☛ � ☛ ✠ ✡ ✡ ✆ ✡ ✡ ✝ ✌ ✡ ✑ ✒ ✎ ✒ ✒ ✎ ✒ ✒ � ✁ ✆ ☛ ✍ ✂ ✏ ✄ ✄ ✌ ☎ ✎ ✞ 2) How does the IGM change by the jet impact? It depends ... Basic parameter : the density contrast jet / IGM Constraints: non-relativistic jet 2 3 L r j j v j j 0 3 L 47 r kpc 2 n 0 1 v 3 3 6 10 0.2 cm 0.5c relativistic jet 2 3 L 2 r j h 1 c j 2 h j 0 4 L 47 r kpc 2 n 0 3 1 1 4 10 0.2 cm

  6. How does the IGM change by the jet impact? So we need simulations of jets: 1) at low density contrast and 2) big enough and depending on the cooling timescale of the environment a) non-radiative Bipolar simulation, King profile η =10 - 4 Final size: > 200 jet radii = 100 kpc b) radiative (same but only 60 jet radii final size)

  7. What kind of halo do we produce? No shock disruption (Mellema 2003) Shocked external gas has high temperature ( ≅ 10 Mio K) Pressure may activate preexisting emission line cloud population

  8. ✂ ☎ ✄ � ✁ Pressure Central part behaves as spherical blastwave 1 5 3 L t r c Central bow shock radius Pressure distribution

  9. bremsstrahlung: comparison to other results and X-ray data from Cygnus A Cygnus A (Chandra archive, courtesy P. Strub) Compare details! Cygnus A´s: η 10 -4 Nirvana (Krause, 2003 in prep) Cocoon width: Sim: 25 jet radii Obs: 40 jet radii

  10. ✁ � ✂ � ✁ Cooling important? t c t d 7 n 0 1 6 7 Cooling in expanding halo: 36 Myr L 47 t c Cygnus A High Redshift Radio Galaxies 100 Myr 5 Myr M87 50 Myr 2 Myr luminosity 20 Myr 1 Myr 10 Myr Central density

  11. How does IGM change by jet impact? b)radiative bow shocks Density Temperature 1 Myr Before cooling: some mixing in the central regions 3 Myr Immediately after cooling: Thin Cool (10,000K) Shell has formed. 7 Myr Long after cooling: Shell fragments, cool clouds, SF

  12. Cooling produces turbulence Jet beam probability everywhere! Likely area of big Log normal: starburst. supersonic turbulence Cooling Density TI tail Probability Log normal: supersonic turbulence Res. Limit Density

  13. IC cocoon appearance Compton upscattering: ν ´= γ 2 ν Typical γ needed for CMB or FIR background in 4C41.17: γ = a few 100 - 1000 IC cooling time on microwave background: t ½ = 13 Myr (1000/ γ 0 ) (4.8/z+1) 4 Given strong cooling & coupling to protons, electrons in cocoon should obey Maxwell distribution, i.e. (kT >> mc 2 ): P IC ∝ γ 2 x γ 2 e - γ / θ / θ 3 θ =kT/m e c 2 T j ≈ ( Γ−1) 10 12 K

  14. IC cocoon appearance Non-radiative, const. illumination Radiative, constant illumination Radiative, r -2 illumination Non-radiative, r -2 illumination

  15. Simulated inverse Compton emission Cooled jet, thermal cocoon electrons, γ =1000 Apparent cocoon width fills most of jet-affected region

  16. 4C 41.17: large cocoon width, mixed into emission line region =>> evidence for the cooled jet model

  17. Is there a common mechanism for line absorbers in normal and small radio galaxies? Ly alpha absorption, Ly alpha emission, normal galaxy, Z=2.73 radio galaxy Z=2.77 Typical V= -300 km/s Van Ojik et al. 1997 Pettini et al. 2002 Models: Model: super wind bubble with a) low density shell (Binette et al.2000) cooled high density shell b) high density shell (Krause 2002)

  18. Thin, dense shell from the cooled jet Thin Shell: • internal velocity (sound speed) 20 km/s (very good!) • 10,000 K • May explain blue shifted • 10 pc width absorption systems in small high redshift radio galaxies • very high density

  19. Why don't we see the shell in emission? Radiation transfer on simulation (Sabine Richling)

  20. � ✂ ✁ � ✂ ✁ ✁ ✂ ✂ ✁ ✁ ✁ Comparison of energetics for radio galaxies: Jet bubble Starburst superwind bubble 3 (jet driven bubble) 3 n 1 3 r 10 kpc 1 1 2 483 km/s L 46 v 3 (galactic wind) 3 n 0 3 r 10 kpc 1 1 2 194 km/s SN/year v High external densities n > 1 cm -3 are required for the jet bubble model. Alternative: jet starts in the superwind.

  21. Possible Cartoon-Scenario Faint shell Fragmented shell 50 kpc 3) destroy shell by 2) start jet inside 1) make superwind jet impact, superwind with right velocities fill shell with turbulence, ~ 10 Myr ~ 100 Myr make big starburst LyA luminosity: ~10 41 erg/s x SN/yr Needs test by hydrodynamic simulation!

  22. 1) High Z Radio Galaxies mark protocluster centers which were all active in the early universe. 2) The jet can influence a large region perpendicular to it, and drive thermally instable turbulence. This could explain observed X-ray and LyA size. Summary 3) Superwinds may help to explain absorbers in normal and small radio galaxies

Recommend


More recommend