TEM EM (TRA RAJECT JECTOR ORY Y EQ EQUIF IFINA INALIT LITY MOD ODEL EL) Tomoya a IKEZAWA Ka Kans nsai ai Un University sity
Wh What at is is T TEM EM(T (Traject rajector ory y Eq Equi uifin inal alit ity Mod odel el) ? ■ One e of qualit itati tive e res esea earch h met ethod. od. ■ The e conc ncep ept t of equi equifin inal alit ity was as in introduce duced d in into the e fie ield d of ps psychology hology by Jaan Valsin iner er. ■ It is is a a res esea earch h meth ethod od ai aimed ed at at dr drawin ing g pe persona nal lif ife e an and d expe perie ience ce wit ith ir irrever ersib ible le tim ime( e(Sato o 2009 09).
Da Data ta nu numb mber er of of in inter ervie view Data a number er of inter ervie iew Merit it It is possible ible to search h the depths s 1 of personal onal experiences eriences It is possible ible to resear earch h the 4 ± 1 diversity ity of experien erience It is possible ible to grasp sp the type of 9 ± 2 the route (Arakawa, Yasuda Sato 2012)
TE TEM M Bas asic ic ter erm inality Point ． EFP ■ Equifinality EFP The points of diversified experiences converging. cation Point ． BFP ■ Bifur furcation BFP The point where a certain selection diversely divides each action. Passage Point ． OPP ■ Ob Obligat atory y Pa OPP The point where logical, institutional and customary that almost all people must experience. ■ Irreversib sible Time ■ Social al effect
Ho How w to o cr creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph Fi First of al all, expo port t al all the e expe perie ience ce from the e da data an and d conn nnec ect t wit ith a l a lin ine. e. BPF EFP
Ho How w to o cr creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph Next, , Connec ect actual expe perie ience ces s wit ith solid id lin ines es. BFP EFP
Ho How w to o cr creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph EFP Writ ite e bip ipolariz ized ed equi equifin inalit ity EFP and d socia ial ef effec ects ts. Social Effect Time
Ho How w to o cr creat eate e TE TEM M gr grap aph Writ ite e Multi-fin inali lity ty. BFP Multifinality Points EFP
Ex Exam ample ple Res esear earch ch ■ Comm mmon on point ■ Target: t: 3 athletes es At the first st Ol Olympic c appearance, ance, they 1. 1. To belong ong same team got ot the expec ected d resul ult. t. However er, , at 2. 2. To cont ntinu nue ps psycho chologica logical the e second ond Olympic ic appearance, ance, they y suppor pport could uld not ot get et the expec ected d resu sult. t. 3. 3. To pa partici cipan pant t Olympi pic c twice
Posit itiv ive e Men ental al Posit ition ion Hap appe pen n Ev Even ent Neg egat ativ ive e Men ental al Posit ition ion Social Effect Time Line
Did not ot select cted ed interna nati tiona onal team Adjustm ustmen ent for Olymp mpic ic Participat Pa cipated ed Olympic pic Final Select cted ed Olympi pic c Select cted ed Impor mporta tant nt Det etermi mina nati tion on selecti ection Decide ided Internat ernationa onal prelimi minar ary Interna ernationa tional Interna ernationa tional of of of of Internat ernationa onal team rounds team conven enti tion on Olymp mpic ic Internat ernationa onal team appearan arance ce team
Relieved ed to get et right Decline ne of response onse of particip ipat ating ng mot otiv ivat ation on for result Olympi pic. c. sense se of Conf nfidence dence responsibility onsibility and response nse as Internat ernationa onal team
Confl flict ict of human n relations ons Confl flict ict of injury Could d not ot get et Satisf sfact actor ory results ts Confl flict ict of human n relations ons Transf sfer ers s Uncomf Un omfor orta table e overseas seas team appoin intme tment nt for the players Confl flict ict of not ot Linked Li ed up being ng able to move interna nati tiona onal team Social Effect
Impor porta tant nt Poi oint nt ■ Qualit itati tive e res esea earch h ten ends ds to be a e an ar arbit itrary y res esult of res esea earche chers. Ther eref efore, ore, the e met ethod d is is bet better er to ver erif ify res esults ts wit ith multi tipl ple e res esea earche hers. s.
THA THANK NK YOU OU FOR OR LI LISTE TENING NING
Recommend
More recommend