technologies register plus
play

Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 30, 2024 •5 likes •1.22k views

Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society 63 rd Annual Meeting Vancouver September 14 16, 2017 1 CARTR Plus presentation outline Introduction of ART treatment

  1. Proportion of miscarriage and stillbirth rates ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2015 50 40 Percent per ET cycle (%) 31.3 28.2 30 27.3 20 15.0 8.5 8.3 8.2 8.3 10 0.34 0.27 0.30 0.31 0 Live birth MiscarriageƗ Stillbirth* <35 35 – 39 ≥40 OVERALL Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) 24 * Stillbirths: birth outcome where no fetus(es) was born alive and at least one stillbirth at ≥ 20 weeks’ gestation Ɨ Miscarriage: birth outcome where all fetuses were a ‘pregnancy loss’ at <20 weeks’ gestation

  2. Percentage of birth outcomes by method of insemination ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2015 50 47.8 44.0 38.6 40 37.2 36.6 35.7 32.7 Percent per ET cycle (%) 31.2 29.2 30 25.6 25.5 21.9 20 10 0 Conventional IVF only ICSI only Conventional IVF and ICSI Ongoing clinical pregnancy Live birth Singleton live birth Live birth - Good perinatal outcome* 25 * Good perinatal outcome: singleton live birth at ≥37 weeks’ gestation and a birth weight ≥2,500 grams † Conventional IVF and ICSI: a single ET cycle used both conventional IVF and ICSI

  3. Proportion of singleton and multiple live births Baby level - All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2015 1.25 3.2 100 6.06 80 35.4 41.4 60 Percent (%) 40 20 96.8 57.4 58.6 0 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 embryos Singleton live birth Twin live birth Triplet+ live birth Live births 4,067 2,798 198 26 Singleton live birth: one live birth Twin live birth: two births and at least one live birth Triplet+ live birth: three or more births and at least one live birth

  4. Proportion of preterm births by plurality Baby level - All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2015 100 80 Percent per live birth (%) 62 60 59 60 48 40 20 16 10 10 10 0 Singleton Multiple Fresh IVF – own oocytes* Fresh IVF – donor oocytes FET – own oocytes* FET – donor oocytes * Own oocytes exclusively 27 Preterm birth <37 weeks’ gestation Total number of live births were used as the denominator for these calculations .

  5. Birth outcomes by province All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2015 50 40 Percent per cycle start (%) 30 27 22 22 19 19 19 18 20 16 16 10 0 Ontario Quebec Rest of Canada Live birth Singleton live birth Live birth Good perinatal outcome* 28 * Good perinatal outcome: singleton live birth at ≥37 weeks’ gestation and a birth weight ≥2,500 grams Cycle starts, and embryo transfers with an unknown birth outcome were removed from the denominator (n=353)

  6. Birth outcomes by province All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2015 50 40 34 Percent per ET cycle (%) 30 29 30 27 26 26 24 22 22 20 10 0 Ontario Quebec Rest of Canada Live birth Singleton live birth Live birth Good perinatal outcome* 29 * Good perinatal outcome: singleton live birth at ≥37 weeks’ gestation and a birth weight ≥2,500 grams Cycle starts, and embryo transfers with an unknown birth outcome were removed from the denominator (n=353)

  7. Percentage of multiple live births by province Baby level - All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2015 40 30 28.0 Percent per live birth (%) 22.5 19.9 20 10 5.2 0 Ontario Quebec Rest of Canada OVERALL Multiple 600 97 708 1,405 births 30 Ongoing clinical pregnancy: documentation of at least one fetal heart beat on ultrasound Multiple birth: At least one live birth from a multiple pregnancy

  8. TREATMENT CYCLES FOR 2016 All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen) 31

  9. Number of treatment cycles 2016 16,000 15,344 14,000 12,071 11,902 12,000 10,000 8,084 8,000 6,000 4,000 1,587 1,580 2,000 754 460 343 426 178 125 57 58 0 Fresh IVF – own Fresh IVF – donor Natural/modified FET – own FET – donor Frozen oocyte IVF Frozen oocyte IVF oocytes* oocytes natural IVF* oocytes* oocytes – own oocytes* – donor oocytes Cycle starts / Embryo thaw cycles ET cycles 32 * Own oocytes exclusively

  10. Number of treatment cycles 2015 16,000 15,273 14,000 12,000 10,000 9,526 9,251 9,075 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 1,229 1,233 956 722 479 417 383 331 83 51 0 Fresh IVF – own Fresh IVF – donor Natural/modified FET – own FET – donor Frozen oocyte IVF Frozen oocyte IVF oocytes* oocytes natural IVF* oocytes* oocytes – own oocytes* – donor oocytes Cycle starts / Embryo thaw cycles ET cycles 33 * Own oocytes exclusively

  11. Type of treatment cycle, per cycle start All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2016 IVF 51.6 FET 43.8 Frozen oocyte IVF 1.9 Oocyte banking 2.0 IVM 0.1 0 20 40 60 80 Percent (%) 34

  12. Type of treatment cycle, per cycle start All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2016 Fresh IVF – own oocytes* 49.2 Fresh IVF – donor oocytes 2.4 Natural/modified natural IVF* 0.6 FET – own oocytes* 38.7 FET – donor oocytes 5.1 Frozen oocyte IVF – own oocytes* 0.4 Frozen oocyte IVF – donor oocytes 1.5 Oocyte banking 2.0 IVM 0.1 0 20 40 60 80 Percent (%) 35 * Own oocytes exclusively

  13. Type of treatment cycle, per cycle start All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2016 Type of treatment cycle Number Percent IVF – own oocytes* 15,344 49.22 IVF – donor oocytes 754 2.42 Natural/modified natural IVF* 178 0.57 FET – own oocytes* 12071 38.72 FET – donor oocytes 1587 5.09 Frozen oocyte IVF – own oocytes* 125 0.40 Frozen oocyte IVF – donor oocytes 460 1.48 Oocyte banking 626 2.01 IVM 27 0.09 TOTAL TREATMENT CYCLES 31,174 36 * Own oocytes exclusively

  14. Reasons for treatment All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2016 Male factor 30.4 Unexplained infertility 19.7 Advanced female age 18.0 14.3 Diminished ovarian reserve Tubal factor 9.0 PGS/PGD 8.9 PCOS 8.4 Endometriosis 7.0 Other ovulatory disorder 4.8 4.5 Other female factor No male partner 3.4 Other uterine factor 2.9 Other reasons† 1.7 Oocyte/embryo banking for cancer treatment 1.2 Oocyte/embryo banking for non-cancer/non-medical reasons 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percent per cycle start (%) * Categories are not mutually exclusive † Other reasons include: gonadotoxic therapy, no female partner and peritoneal factor or severe adhesions 37

  15. Clinical pregnancy by type of treatment cycle 2016 60 50 50 47 43 40 36 35 36 35 Percent (%) 33 32 31 30 23 20 17 14 10 10 0 Fresh IVF – own Fresh IVF – donor Natural/modified FET – own oocytes* FET – donor Frozen oocyte IVF – Frozen oocyte IVF – oocytes* oocytes natural IVF* oocytes own oocytes* donor oocytes Per cycle start / embryo thaw cycle Per ET cycle Clinical 172 18 4,276 18 199 2,681 561 pregnancies 38 * Own oocytes exclusively † Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy

  16. Singleton ongoing clinical pregnancy by type of treatment cycle 2016 60 50 41 40 34 Percent (%) 31 30 30 30 29 30 28 27 25 19 20 14 11 9 10 0 Fresh IVF – own Fresh IVF – donor Natural/modified FET – own FET – donor Frozen oocyte IVF Frozen oocyte IVF oocytes* oocytes natural IVF* oocytes* oocytes – own oocytes* – donor oocytes Per cycle start / embryo thaw cycle Per ET cycle * Own oocytes exclusively 39 † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  17. Specialized services All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2016 Description Number of cycles Gestational carrier 639 Pre-implantation genetic screening and/or diagnosis (PGS/PGD) 4,475 Oocyte or embryo banking due to cancer treatment 378 Oocyte or embryo banking due to non-cancer/non-medical reasons 325 Any use of donor oocytes or embryos 2,826 Frozen oocyte IVF 585 40

  18. Oocyte or embryo freezing for non-medical reasons 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Year Number of cycles 2013 132 2014 174 2015 280 2016 325 Overall 911 41

  19. Patient age All ART treatment cycles (fresh and frozen), 2016 60 50 Percent per cycle start (%) 38.8 40 30 23.5 20.3 20 10.2 10 7.2 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 Patient age (years) 42

  20. TREATMENT CYCLES FOR 2016 ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes 43

  21. Stage of treatment and treatment outcomes ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 16,000 15,344 14,606 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,084 8,000 88.3% of ongoing 6,000 clinical pregnancies 4,000 2,681 2,438 2,152 2,000 0 Cycle starts (CS) Oocyte retrieval Embryo transfer Clinical Ongoing clinical Singleton cycles (RET) cycles (ET) pregnancies* pregnancies† pregnancies‡ 738 cancelled: 6522 no ET: 17.5% per CS 21.6% per CS 15.9% per CS 4.8% per CS 44.7% per RET 18.4% per RET 23.1% per RET 16.7% per RET 33.2% per ET 36.4% per ET 30.2% per ET * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy 44 † Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound ‡ Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  22. Stage of treatment and treatment outcomes ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 16,000 15,344 14,606 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,084 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,681 2,438 2,152 2,000 0 Cycle starts (CS) Oocyte retrieval Embryo transfer Clinical Ongoing clinical Singleton cycles (RET) cycles (ET) pregnancies* pregnancies† pregnancies‡ * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy 45 † Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound ‡ Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  23. Percentage of cancelled cycles ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 20 15 Percent per cycle start (%) 10 7.8 6.4 5.8 4.8 4.7 5 3.6 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Patient age (years) 46

  24. Reasons for cycle cancellation ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 Low ovarian response 77.5 Other reasons† 16.1 Premature ovulation 3.1 Patient personal reason 1.8 High ovarian response 0.7 Patient error 2.3 Premature luteinization 1.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percent per cancelled cycle (%) 47 * Categories are not mutually exclusive † Other reasons include: patient illness, donor illness, donor personal reason, donor error, no access to ovaries, other (uns pecified)

  25. Percentage of cycles with no embryo transfer ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 56.3 49.2 50 46.5 Percent per oocyte retrieval cycle (%) 44.7 42.7 42.3 40 30 20 10 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Patient age (years) 48

  26. Reasons for no embryo transfer ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 Freeze all, other reason than OHSS risk or PGS/PGD 25.6 Freeze all, PGS 22.4 Freeze all, OHSS risk 17.0 No utilizable embryos 11.2 Freeze all, PGD 9.2 No normal fertilization 5.6 Freeze all, other reason than OHSS risk (unknown PGS/PGD) 3.7 No oocytes 2.0 No utilizable oocytes 1.6 Inadequate uterine lining 1.0 No sperm 0.8 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Percent per oocyte retrieval cycle with no embryo transfer (%) 49 * Categories are mutually exclusive

  27. Reasons for no embryo transfer ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2015 Freeze all, other reason than OHSS risk (unknown PGS/PGD) 32.4 Freeze all, OHSS risk 18.0 No utilizable embryos 15.7 No normal fertilization 9.4 Freeze all, PGD 6.8 Freeze all, other reason than OHSS risk or PGS/PGD 6.0 Freeze all, PGS 5.9 No oocytes 2.9 No utilizable oocytes 1.6 No sperm 0.7 Inadequate uterine lining 0.7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percent per oocyte retrieval cycle with no embryo transfer (%) 50 * Categories are mutually exclusive

  28. Method of insemination ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 76.8 80 70 Percent per oocyte retrieval cycle (%) 60 50 40 30 20 13.2 10 4.5 3.1 2.5 0 Conventional IVF only ICSI only Conventional IVF and Rescue ICSI Not done ICSI 51 Conventional IVF and ICSI: a single ET cycle used both conventional IVF and ICSI

  29. Number of embryos transferred ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 59.2 60 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 40 36.7 30 20 eSET 10 4.1 eDET 0 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 embryos eSET: eDET: 59.5% per ET=1 43.7% per ET=2 52 * Excludes records with missing number of embryos transferred † Elective single ( eSET) and double (eDET) embryo transfer: transfer of one embryo (eSET) or two embryos (eDET), selected from a larger cohort of available embryos

  30. Number of embryos transferred ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 77.1 80 70 60 Percent per ET cycle (%) 54.8 54.5 50 42.5 40 32.2 30 eSET 22.3 20 13.0 eSET eDET 10 eDET 3.0 eDET 0.7 eSET 0 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 embryos embryos embryos <35 years 35 – 39 years ≥40 years 53 Patient age (years)

  31. Embryo transfer day ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 65 58.66 55 45 Percent per ET cycle (%) 35.21 35 25 15 4.5 5 1.15 0.46 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 or 7 -5 54 * Excludes records with missing embryo transfer day

  32. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 40.4 40 35.3 34.7 33.2 Percent (%) 29.5 29.1 30 25.7 20.5 20 17.1 11.2 9.9 10 4.9 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Patient age (years) Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate 55 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  33. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 40 34.4 33.2 33.2 Percent (%) 33.7 30 25.7 24.7 21.4 20 10.3 10 0 1 2 ≥3 OVERALL Number of embryos transferred Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate 56 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  34. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate by eSET/eDET ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 41.0 40.2 40 34.4 33.2 Percent (%) 32.3 30 25.7 24.7 24.3 22.1 20.9 20 10 0 Elective single embryo Non-elective single Elective double embryo Non-elective double OVERALL transfer (eSET) embryo transfer transfer (eDET) embryo transfer Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 57 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  35. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 39.2 40 33.2 Percent (%) 30 25.7 25.9 17.4 20 12.8 10 0 Day 3 Day 5 OVERALL Embryo transfer day Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate 58 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  36. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 37.6 40 31.9 30.1 30 25.6 20 13.5 10 7.0 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Patient age (years) Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound 59 † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  37. Percentage of multiple pregnancies ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 30 20 16.4 14.7 13.7 11.7 8.5 10 5.9 S 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Patient age (years) Multiple 105 91 73 16 S 286 pregnancies * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound 60 † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound S Numbers less than 6 were suppressed

  38. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 40 31.1 30.2 29.9 30 19.2 20 10 0 1 2 ≥3 OVERALL Number of embryos transferred Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 61 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  39. Percentage of multiple pregnancies ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 30 27.0 26.6 20 11.7 10 2.2 0 1 2 ≥3 OVERALL Number of embryos transferred Multiple 33 236 17 286 pregnancies NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 62 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  40. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy by plurality and eSET/eDET ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 40 37.1 31.0 30.2 29.0 30 22.2 20 10 0 Elective single embryo Non-elective single Elective double embryo Non-elective double OVERALL transfer (eSET) embryo transfer transfer (eDET) embryo transfer Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 63 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  41. Percentage of multiple pregnancies by eSET/eDET ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 30 27.1 26.2 20 11.7 10 2.3 2.2 0 Elective single embryo Non-elective single Elective double embryo Non-elective double OVERALL transfer (eSET) embryo transfer transfer (eDET) embryo transfer Multiple 23 10 109 127 286 pregnancies NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 64 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  42. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 40 35.5 30.2 30 24.0 20 10 0 Day 3 Day 5 OVERALL Embryo transfer day Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound 65 † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  43. Percentage of multiple pregnancies ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 30 20 17.5 11.7 9.6 10 0 Day 3 Day 5 OVERALL Embryo transfer day Multiple 119 161 286 pregnancies 66 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  44. Treatment outcomes ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 Treatment outcome Number % per CS % per ET % per CP % per OCP Clinical pregnancy (CP) * 2,681 17.5 33.2 Ongoing clinical pregnancy (OCP) † 2,438 15.9 30.2 90.9 Singleton‡ 2,152 14.0 26.7 10.6 88.3 Multiple‡ 286 1.86 3.53 80.3 11.7 Multiple pregnancy‡ 286 1.86 3.54 10.7 11.7 Twins 274 95.8% of multiple pregnancies were twin gestations Triplet or higher 12 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound 67 ‡ Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  45. Oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy and singleton pregnancy ART cycles using IVF – own oocytes, 2016 120 96 95 100 95 94 94 92 80 Percent per CS (%) 56 60 55 53 50 48 40 40 22 19 19 17 20 15 15 14 11 8 6 4 3 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Patient age (years) Retrieval Embryo transfer Clinical pregnancy* Singleton pregnancy† 68 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  46. TREATMENT CYCLES FOR 2016 ART cycles using FET – own oocytes 69

  47. Stage of treatment and treatment outcomes ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 14,000 11,902 12,071 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,276 3,836 3,534 4,000 2,000 0 Embryo thaw cycles Embryo transfer cycles Clinical pregnancies* Ongoing clinical Singleton pregnancies‡ (ET) pregnancies† 169 no ET: 35.4% per thaw 31.8% per thaw 29.3% per thaw 1.4% per thaw 35.9% per ET 32.2% per ET 29.7% per ET * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy 70 † Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound ‡ Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  48. Percentage of no embryo transfer ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 10 8 Percent per embryo thaw cycle (%) 6 4 3.2 2 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) 71

  49. Number of embryos transferred ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 79.1 80 70 60 Percent per ET cycle (%) 50 40 30 20.2 20 eSET 10 eDET 0.7 0 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 embryos eSET: eDET: 50.1% per ET=1 45.1% per ET=2 72 * Elective single (eSET) and double (eDET) embryo transfer: transfer of one embryo (eSET) or two embryos (eDET), selected from a larger cohort of available embryos

  50. Number of embryos transferred ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 90 84.1 77.1 80 70 62.1 Percent per ET cycle (%) 60 50 40 35.0 30 22.3 eSET 20 15.6 eSET eSET 10 eDET 2.9 0.6 0.3 eDET eDET 0 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 1 embryo 2 embryos ≥3 embryos embryos embryos <35 years 35 – 39 years ≥40 years Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) 73

  51. Method of embryo cryopreservation ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 100 94.3 80 Percent per embryo thaw cycle (%) 60 40 20 5.6 0.1 0 Vitrification Slow freezing Mixed 74

  52. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 50 40 38.3 36.3 35.8 35.9 33.6 32.9 32.1 Percent (%) 30 27.5 22.4 21.8 20 16.7 16.1 10 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate 75 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  53. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 50 39.0 40 35.8 35.9 35.2 32.1 29.4 30 Percent (%) 26.0 20 12.1 10 0 1 2 ≥3 OVERALL Number of embryos transferred Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate 76 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  54. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rate by eSET/eDET ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 50 38.7 39.3 40 37.5 36.8 35.9 34.1 33.6 32.1 30 Percent (%) 26.1 25.9 20 10 0 Elective single embryo Non-elective single Elective double embryo Non-elective double OVERALL transfer (eSET) embryo transfer transfer (eDET) embryo transfer Clinical pregnancy, per ET cycle Implantation rate NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 77 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  55. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 50 40 34.8 Percent per ET cycle (%) 32.5 32.2 29.3 30 18.5 20 17.6 10 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy 78 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  56. Percentage of multiple pregnancies ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 30 20 10 8.2 8.0 7.9 7.6 6.8 5.4 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) Multiple 178 70 44 8 S 302 pregnancies * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound 79 † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound S Numbers less than 6 were suppressed

  57. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 50 40 34.4 Percent per ET cycle (%) 32.2 31.7 28.2 30 20 10 0 1 2 ≥3 OVERALL Number of embryos transferred Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 80 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  58. Percentage of multiple pregnancies ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 29.0 30 25.0 20 10 7.9 1.9 0 1 2 ≥3 OVERALL Number of embryos transferred Multiple 57 239 6 302 pregnancies NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 81 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  59. Proportion of cycles resulting in an ongoing clinical pregnancy by plurality and eSET/eDET ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 60 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 40 34.6 34.2 33.6 32.2 29.9 30 20 10 0 Elective single embryo Non-elective single Elective double embryo Non-elective double OVERALL transfer (eSET) embryo transfer transfer (eDET) embryo transfer Singleton pregnancy Multiple pregnancy NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 82 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  60. Percentage of multiple pregnancies by eSET/eDET ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 40 Percent per ongoing clinical pregnancy (%) 30.1 30 28.0 20 10 7.9 2.1 1.8 0 Elective single embryo Non-elective single Elective double embryo Non-elective double OVERALL transfer (eSET) embryo transfer transfer (eDET) embryo transfer Multiple 28 29 113 126 302 pregnancies NOTE: In rare cases, a single embryo may divide and produce twins or triplets. For this reason, a small percentage of multiple pregnancies can result from a single embryo transfer 83 * Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound † Multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  61. Treatment outcomes ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 Treatment outcome Number % per % per ET % per CP % per OCP embryo thaw Clinical pregnancy (CP) * 4,276 35.4 35.9 Ongoing clinical pregnancy (OCP) † 3,836 31.8 32.2 89.7 Singleton‡ 3,534 29.3 29.7 82.6 92.1 Multiple‡ 302 2.5 2.5 7.1 7.9 Multiple pregnancy‡ 302 96.7% of multiple pregnancies were twin gestations 2.5 2.5 7.1 7.9 Twins 292 Triplet or higher 10 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy 84 † Ongoing clinical pregnancy: clinical pregnancy with ≥1 fetal heart beat on ultrasound ‡ Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound; multiple pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with >1 fetal heart beat

  62. Embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy and singleton clinical pregnancy ART cycles using FET – own oocytes, 2016 98 99 99 99 99 97 100 80 Percent per embryo thaw cycle (%) 60 38 40 36 35 33 32 30 29 27 22 22 17 20 16 0 <35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 ≥43 OVERALL Age at time of oocyte retrieval (years) Embryo transfer Clinical pregnancy* Singleton pregnancy† 85 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound

  63. OVERALL SUMMARY 86

  64. Clinical pregnancy by age at time of oocyte retrieval and type of treatment cycle 2016 60 50 Percent per CS/embryo thaw cycle (%) 40 38 38 36 35 35 35 28 30 26 25 23 23 22 21 18 20 18 17 10 9 9 10 4 0 Fresh IVF – own oocytes* Fresh IVF – donor oocytes Natural/modified natural FET – own oocytes* FET – donor oocytes IVF* <35 35 – 39 ≥40 OVERALL 87 * Own oocytes exclusively † Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy

  65. Clinical pregnancy by age at time of oocyte retrieval and type of treatment cycle 2016 70 60 53 52 50 50 Percent per ET cycle (%) 43 41 38 38 40 37 36 36 36 33 33 31 31 28 30 25 24 20 19 20 10 0 Fresh IVF – own oocytes* Fresh IVF – donor oocytes Natural/modified natural FET – own oocytes* FET – donor oocytes IVF* <35 35 – 39 ≥40 OVERALL 88 * Own oocytes exclusively † Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy

  66. Implantation rate 2016 60 50 44 40 40 Percent (%) 32 32 30 30 26 25 20 10 0 Fresh IVF – own Fresh IVF – donor Natural/modified FET – own FET – donor Frozen oocyte IVF Frozen oocyte IVF oocytes* oocytes natural IVF* oocytes* oocytes – own oocytes* – donor oocytes Type of treatment cycle 89 * Own oocytes exclusively † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  67. Implantation rate by age at time of oocyte retrieval and type of treatment cycle 2016 60 53 50 47 44 40 36 35 33 Percent (%) 33 32 32 32 32 30 30 30 26 26 26 24 19 20 17 13 10 0 Fresh IVF – own oocytes* Fresh IVF – donor oocytes Natural/modified natural FET – own oocytes* FET – donor oocytes IVF* <35 35 – 39 ≥40 OVERALL 90 * Own oocytes exclusively † Implantation rate: number of gestational sacs observed on ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos transferred

  68. Singleton ongoing clinical pregnancy by age at time of oocyte retrieval and type of treatment cycle 2016 60 50 Percent per CS/embryo thaw cycle (%) 40 32 31 30 29 29 28 30 22 19 19 19 19 18 20 14 14 13 11 9 9 10 6 S 0 Fresh IVF – own oocytes* Fresh IVF – donor oocytes Natural/modified natural FET – own oocytes* FET – donor oocytes IVF* <35 35 – 39 ≥40 OVERALL * Own oocytes exclusively 91 † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound S Numbers less than 6 were suppressed

  69. Singleton ongoing clinical pregnancy by age at time of oocyte retrieval and type of treatment cycle 2016 60 50 44 41 40 Percent per ET cycle (%) 40 35 32 31 30 30 30 29 29 30 28 27 26 24 22 20 20 15 12 10 S 0 Fresh IVF – own oocytes* Fresh IVF – donor oocytes Natural/modified natural FET – own oocytes* FET – donor oocytes IVF* <35 35 – 39 ≥40 OVERALL * Own oocytes exclusively † Singleton pregnancy: ongoing clinical pregnancy with only one fetal heart beat on ultrasound 92 S Numbers less than 6 were suppressed

  70. CYCLES USING PGS 93

  71. Proportion of utilizable embryos and clinical pregnancy for cycles with and without PGS IVF and FET, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Cycles without PGS Cycles with PGS Number of embryos thawed 69,388 3,042 Number of utilizable embryos after thaw 59,999 2,827 Proportion of utilizable embryos after 86.5% 92.9% thaw Number of clinical pregnancies 31,567 1,194 Proportion of clinical pregnancies per 28.6% 20.2% cycle start Proportion of clinical pregnancies per ET 37.5% 44.3% cycle 94

  72. PRIMARY TRANSFER RATE 95

  73. Primary transfer • Cohort: – Patients with first IVF cycle in CARTR Plus and no documented prior treatment cycle using own oocytes – The first treatment cycle with an embryo transfer • IVF with own oocytes • FET with own oocytes 96

  74. Primary transfer rate • Several options for calculation: – Per patient: treatment cycle outcomes can be linked for a patient throughout the database – Per batch of oocytes collected: treatment cycles that used frozen oocytes or embryos can be linked to the IVF cycle where the oocytes were collected 97

  75. Primary transfer clinical pregnancy rate, per patient IVF and FET, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 100 80 Percent per primary transfer (%) 60 45.2 40.1 40 34.7 20 0 <35 ≥35 OVERALL Patient age (years) Clinical 11,163 8,192 19,355 pregnancy 98 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy

  76. Primary transfer clinical pregnancy rate, per patient by oocyte type per patient IVF and FET, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 100 80 Percent per primary transfer (%) 60 45.8 40.1 39.7 40 20 0 Own Donor OVERALL Clinical 17,889 1,466 19,355 pregnancy 99 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy

  77. Primary transfer clinical pregnancy rate, per patient with and without PGS IVF and FET, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 100 80 Percent per primary transfer (%) 60 46.3 39.9 40.1 40 20 0 Excluding cycles with PGS Cycles with PGS OVERALL Clinical 18,697 658 19,355 pregnancy 100 * Clinical pregnancy: clinical intrauterine, heterotopic, or ectopic pregnancy

Recommend

Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society 64 th Annual

Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society 64 th Annual

Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society 64 th Annual Meeting Montreal September 13 15, 2018 1 List of abbreviations CS Cycle start RET Oocyte retrieval ET

1.73k views • 149 slides
Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and

Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and

Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register Plus (CARTR Plus) Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society 62 nd Annual Meeting Toronto September 22-24, 2016 1 CARTR Plus presentation outline All ART treatment cycles 20112015

1.38k views • 103 slides
CREATIVE TECHNOLOGIES WEEK FOUR REGISTER Kim Ho-Young / Reuters INTRODUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY THE

CREATIVE TECHNOLOGIES WEEK FOUR REGISTER Kim Ho-Young / Reuters INTRODUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY THE

CREATIVE TECHNOLOGIES WEEK FOUR REGISTER Kim Ho-Young / Reuters INTRODUCTION PHOTOGRAPHY THE BASICS HOW TO WORK WITH THE CAMERA APERTURE SHUTTER SPEED/EXPOSURE ISO NUMBER THE BASICS TRIFECTA OF PHOTOGRAPHY THE BASICS APERTURE THE

370 views • 33 slides
NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER WHAT IT WILL PROVIDE A

NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER WHAT IT WILL PROVIDE A

NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER WHAT IT WILL PROVIDE A register of outdoor bowlers in Bowls England affiliated Clubs bringing us in line with all other National Governing Bodies An opportunity to

342 views • 19 slides
1 Coalescing Logistics Computing the Interference Graph (in MiniJava compiler) Rule Use results

1 Coalescing Logistics Computing the Interference Graph (in MiniJava compiler) Rule Use results

Register Allocation III Interference Graph Allocators Chaitin Last time Briggs Register allocation across function calls Today Register allocation options CS553 Lecture Register Allocation III 1 CS553 Lecture Register Allocation

288 views • 5 slides
CS 3330: SEQ part 1 condition codes ( ZF , SF ) register input register output updates every

CS 3330: SEQ part 1 condition codes ( ZF , SF ) register input register output updates every

CS 3330: SEQ part 1 condition codes ( ZF , SF ) register input register output updates every clock cycle PC Registers 2 status register (is the processor still running?) register fjle (15 registers: %rax , %rdx , ) 13 September 2016

366 views • 8 slides
FROM THE SASINE REGISTER TO THE LAND REGISTER AN OVERVIEW NHS Scotland Conference, Crieff 5

FROM THE SASINE REGISTER TO THE LAND REGISTER AN OVERVIEW NHS Scotland Conference, Crieff 5

FROM THE SASINE REGISTER TO THE LAND REGISTER AN OVERVIEW NHS Scotland Conference, Crieff 5 November 2015 David G Barbour Head of Commercial Property Department NHS Scotland Central Legal Office SASINE REGISTER Established 1617

429 views • 38 slides
CREATING A SWEDISH INFRASTRUCTURE FOR REGISTER-BASED RESEARCH REGISTERFORSKNING.SE &amp; REGISTER

CREATING A SWEDISH INFRASTRUCTURE FOR REGISTER-BASED RESEARCH REGISTERFORSKNING.SE &amp; REGISTER

CREATING A SWEDISH INFRASTRUCTURE FOR REGISTER-BASED RESEARCH REGISTERFORSKNING.SE &amp; REGISTER UTILISER TOOL (RUT) Karl Gertow &amp; Magnus Eriksson Unit for Register-Based Research Swedish Research Council Open national SIMSAM meeting

450 views • 32 slides
Register allocation Michel Schinz Advanced Compiler Construction 2008-05-16 Register

Register allocation Michel Schinz Advanced Compiler Construction 2008-05-16 Register

Register allocation Michel Schinz Advanced Compiler Construction 2008-05-16 Register allocation The problem of register allocation consists in rewriting a program that makes use of an unbounded number of local variables also called

625 views • 49 slides
V. Register Machine Yuxi Fu BASICS, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Register Machines are more

V. Register Machine Yuxi Fu BASICS, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Register Machines are more

V. Register Machine Yuxi Fu BASICS, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Register Machines are more abstract than Turing Machines. Computability Theory, by Y. Fu V. Register Machine 1 / 35 Register Machine Models can be classified into three groups:

629 views • 39 slides
Register Allocation (via graph coloring and spilling) Register allocation LLVM IR uses an

Register Allocation (via graph coloring and spilling) Register allocation LLVM IR uses an

Register Allocation (via graph coloring and spilling) Register allocation LLVM IR uses an unbounded set of virtual registers. Register allocation yields code in terms of hardware registers. These are limited. For example, x86_64 has:

371 views • 25 slides
Digital Design Discussion: RTL Storage Components Shift Register Timing Register File Timing

Digital Design Discussion: RTL Storage Components Shift Register Timing Register File Timing

Principles Of Digital Design Discussion: RTL Storage Components Shift Register Timing Register File Timing RAM Up/Down Counter FIFO Queue Shift Register Timing Problem: Complete the timing diagram for the shift register shown. Assume

302 views • 12 slides
BBC Technologies: Our LATAM Experience Who are BBC Technologies? BBC Technologies Where we are

BBC Technologies: Our LATAM Experience Who are BBC Technologies? BBC Technologies Where we are

BBC Technologies: Our LATAM Experience Who are BBC Technologies? BBC Technologies Where we are today Technology World leaders in Advance Processing Technologies for small fruits and vegetables. R&amp;D Strong focus on research

383 views • 17 slides
Latvian Diabetes Register Eva Ramuse, Public health analyst of the Register Supervision Unit

Latvian Diabetes Register Eva Ramuse, Public health analyst of the Register Supervision Unit

Latvian Diabetes Register Eva Ramuse, Public health analyst of the Register Supervision Unit eva.ramuse@spkc.gov.lv; tel. +371 67387664 www.spkc.gov.lv About the Register Set up in 1997 Web-based and a part of Register for Patients

485 views • 10 slides
Register Names lecture 9 MIPS assembly language 2 - register names - pseudo instructions

Register Names lecture 9 MIPS assembly language 2 - register names - pseudo instructions

Register Names lecture 9 MIPS assembly language 2 - register names - pseudo instructions - immediate versions - signed and unsigned - shifting February 8, 2016 We will learn other register names later. Conditional Branch

145 views • 3 slides
1. How to Register Your Data (cf. Fig. 1) Markus Demleitner msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de (cf.

1. How to Register Your Data (cf. Fig. 1) Markus Demleitner msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de (cf.

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 1. How to Register Your Data (cf. Fig. 1) Markus Demleitner msdemlei@ari.uni-heidelberg.de (cf. Fig. 2) Why register? Registry architecture Web-based registration Less Manual alternatives 2. Why Register? Google

295 views • 6 slides
1 Register-memory Register-register (Load-store) There is no implicit operand Both operands are

1 Register-memory Register-register (Load-store) There is no implicit operand Both operands are

What Is ISA? Instruction set architecture is the structure of a computer that a machine language Lecture 3: Instruction Set programmer (or a compiler) must understand Architecture to write a correct (timing independent) program for that

390 views • 4 slides
All participants must register to join this meeting on the computer (please share!):

All participants must register to join this meeting on the computer (please share!):

CoIIN to Advance Care for Children with Medical Complexity Video conference access PRE-REGISTER Boston University Slideshow Title Goes Here Please see Zoom registration confirmation email All participants must register to join this

682 views • 24 slides
https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote Can register here and at home, vote in both local elections

https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote Can register here and at home, vote in both local elections

https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote Can register here and at home, vote in both local elections Vote on National things once, can decide at last moment Examples Find the radius of convergence of the following functions. (sinh( n

418 views • 6 slides
Control Unit Datapath Elements &amp; Single Cycle Datapath Unit Register Files Register Layout

Control Unit Datapath Elements &amp; Single Cycle Datapath Unit Register Files Register Layout

Control Unit Datapath Elements &amp; Single Cycle Datapath Unit Register Files Register Layout Register Files Write Decoder Register Files Write Decoder Register Files 32-Bit words, 32 Registers Adder/Subtractor General Unit Diagram

1.38k views • 36 slides
1 Calling Conventions Architecture Review: Caller- and Callee-Saved Registers Partition

1 Calling Conventions Architecture Review: Caller- and Callee-Saved Registers Partition

Prelude Register Allocation II The Sears Tower in Chicago was the worlds Last time tallest building from 1974 until 1998. Register allocation Global allocation via graph coloring Today More register allocation Fun facts

229 views • 5 slides
Outline What is register allocation P3 / 2003 Webs Interference Graphs Register

Outline What is register allocation P3 / 2003 Webs Interference Graphs Register

Outline What is register allocation P3 / 2003 Webs Interference Graphs Register Allocation Graph coloring Spilling Live-Range Splitting More optimizations Kostis Sagonas Spring 2003 2 Storing values between

401 views • 13 slides
More Register Allocation Last time Register allocation Global allocation via graph

More Register Allocation Last time Register allocation Global allocation via graph

More Register Allocation Last time Register allocation Global allocation via graph coloring Today More register allocation Clarifications from last time Finish improvements on basic graph coloring concept Procedure

341 views • 18 slides
Global Register Allocation Memory Hierarchy Management Register Allocation via Graph

Global Register Allocation Memory Hierarchy Management Register Allocation via Graph

Lecture Outline Global Register Allocation Memory Hierarchy Management Register Allocation via Graph Coloring Register interference graph Graph coloring heuristics Spilling Cache Management Compiler Design I

142 views • 11 slides

More recommend