tajiguas resource recovery project
play

Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project 2018 CAPCOA Engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project 2018 CAPCOA Engineering Symposium Kevin Brown Air Quality Engineer III Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District October 30, 2018 1 Presentation Overview Background Process Description


  1. Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project 2018 CAPCOA Engineering Symposium Kevin Brown Air Quality Engineer III Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District October 30, 2018 1

  2. Presentation Overview • Background • Process Description • Emission Controls • Permit Highlights • Project Challenges • Summary 2

  3. 3

  4. Landfill Background • On the coast • Reaching capacity in the near future • Replacement landfill not finalized 4

  5. Regulatory Background 5

  6. Process Description 6

  7. Process Streams 7

  8. 8

  9. Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) • Tipping Area – Accepts 290,000 TPY combined waste • Materials Sorting Area – Recyclables – Organics – Residual waste • Paper Dryer 9

  10. What is the Anaerobic Digestion Process? • Decomposition of waste in an oxygen-free environmental • Naturally occurs in the landfill • Process is sped up using percolate and creating an ideal environment • Byproduct is digester gas 10

  11. Anaerobic Digestion Facility (ADF) • 16 heated, enclosed digesters • Dimensions: 100’ L x 22’ W x 16’ H • 710 ton capacity • 28 day digestion cycle • Video of Digester Operations 11

  12. 12

  13. Combined Heat and Power Engines • Digester Gas CHP Engines: – Two GE/Jenbacher JMS 416 B82 engines – 1,573 bhp/1,141 kWe each • Landfill Gas CHP Engines: – Two GE/Jenbacher JMG 420 B82 engines – 1,966 bhp/1,429 kWe each • Electricity used for onsite needs or sold to the grid • Heat used for digesters or paper recycling 13

  14. Compost Management Unit • Twenty- six 230’ L x 16’ W x 12’ H windrows • Cured six to eight weeks • Sold as commodity 14

  15. 15

  16. Emission Controls 16

  17. Baghouses • Used to control PM emissions from: – MRF tipping area – MRF sorting area – Paper dryer 17

  18. Ammonia Scrubbers • MRF – Two crossflow scrubbers – Reduce odor • ADF – Crossflow scrubber – Reduce ammonia 18

  19. Biofilters • Used to control VOC, PM, ammonia and odors from: – MRF tipping area – MRF sorting area – ADF • Size: 80 ’ L x 80’ W x 8 ’ H • Capacity: 50,000 cubic feet 19

  20. Activated Carbon Filters • Used to reduce H 2 S concentration in biogas prior to combustion in the digester gas fired CHP engines 20

  21. SCR/Oxidation Catalyst • Combined SCR and Oxidation Catalyst • Urea Injection • NOx and CO control • Equipped on the four combined heating and power engines 21

  22. Enclosed Flares • Digester Gas Flare – John Zink ZTOF enclosed flare – 15.805 MMBtu/hr heat input rating – Downstream from Venturi scrubber to reduce ammonia concentration • Landfill Gas Flare – John Zink ZTOF enclosed flare – 39.000 MMBtu/hr heat input rating 22

  23. Compost Best Management Practices • 20% dry woodchip blending • Turning every 2 weeks • 20 minute irrigation after turning • 50% to 60% moisture content • Video of Windrow Turner • Emission Factor Assumption for Digestate Compost 23

  24. Permit Highlights 24

  25. BACT/CEMS • BACT triggered for NO x , VOC, SO x , PM, PM 10 and PM 2.5 • Equipment subject to BACT: ADF, baghouses, CHP engines, enclosed flares, composting operations, and emergency electrical generators • Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) and Data Acquisition System (DAS) for CHP engines 25

  26. Offset Exemption • California Health & Safety Code §42314 – Produces 50 megawatts or less of electricity – Applies BACT – Emissions reductions from shutdown of existing equipment to be provided as emissions offsets – Provide reasonable available offsets from facilities it owns or operates – Made a good faith effort to secured reasonably available offsets 26

  27. Permitted Emission Limits • Annual Potential to Emit for Project (TPY): NOx VOC CO SOx PM PM10 PM2.5 10.81 10.68 23.03 1.79 6.77 6.66 6.66 27

  28. Project Challenges 28

  29. HRA Modeling • Update model for District permit • Toxic emission factors lacking for digester gas • Will require toxic emission source testing at startup 29

  30. Odors • Other waste conversion and composting projects have caused significant odor issues • This project has been designed with odor controls/mitigations 30

  31. California Coastal Boundary • Original project within coastal zone boundary • Forced redesign of facility and supplemental EIR • Resulted in lawsuit and 2 year delay 31

  32. Summary 32

  33. Questions? 33

Recommend


More recommend