SYMPOSIUM: VALIDATION OF THE MAPA NG LOOB, ITS ENGLISH VERSION, AND ITS SHORT FORM The Mapa ng Loob and the Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino: A Validation Study The Development of the English Version of the Mapa ng Loob Validating the Mapa English with the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) Personality Predicts Mate Retention Tactics in Filipino Samples
THE MAPA NG LOOB AND THE PANUKAT NG PAGKATAONG PILIPINO: A VALIDATION STUDY Gregorio E. H. del Pilar and Anna Margarita F. Mangahas Personality Research Laboratory University of the Philippines Diliman 53 rd Annual Convention Psychological Association of the Philippines Fontana Convention Center , Clark Freeport Zone, Pampanga September 14, 2016
The Masaklaw na Panukat ng Loob (Mapa ng Loob) Started in 2010, completed in 2013: 5 semesters Administered to more than 4,000 participants during scale development Total sample mostly of students from UP Diliman, but final sample made up also of students from 3 other institutions in Metro Manila and Luzon, plus an adult sample: N=576 188 items: 22 scales with 8 items each, 12-item Social Desirability scale
The Mapa ng Loob: based on the Five-Factor Model of personality traits The Five-Factor Model : A breakthrough model Put an end to 40 years of inquiry into the structure of the trait universe: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness A powerful model, comprehensive and consensual, that has organized findings related to work, health, intimate relationships, creativity, political attitudes, problem behaviors, psychopathology, etc.
Scales of the Mapa ng Loob Neuroticism – Hina ng Loob, Pagkamaramdamin, Pagkamapag-alala, Pagkasumpungin Extraversion – Pagkamasayahin, Pagkapalakaibigan, Pagkamasigla, Pagkamadaldal Openness to Experience – Kakaibang pag-iisip, Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman, Pagkamakasining, Pagkamaharaya Agreeableness – Pagkadimayabang, Pagkamapagtiwala, Pagkamaunawain, Pagkamapagparaya Conscientiousness – Pagkamasikap, Pagkamapagplano, Pagkaresponsable, Pagkamaingat Also: NA Dalas Makaramdam ng Galit; AC Pagkamatapat; Social Desirability
The Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino Created by Annadaisy J. Carlota in 1985 Made up of 19 scales, 15 of which were based on asking a sample of 360 participants to describe a person they liked, a person they disliked, and themselves; the other 4 measured traits related to creativity Two hundred ten (210) items: scales of varying length (6-14 items) Originally, the Mapa was meant to be an update of the PPP as a five-factor instrument. This idea was abandoned, and all overlap between the two instruments have been removed.
Significance of the study The Mapa: sought to measure its target constructs, but also the five factors The PPP: sought only to measure its target constructs To what extent has the Mapa succeeded in validly measuring its target constructs, despite the constraints imposed by the Five-Factor model?
Constraints imposed by the Five-Factor Model Note: Four facet scales make up each of the domain scales Constraints: 1) for some scales, items were selected on the basis of high convergent correlations with the other scales that make up the target domain, and low discriminant correlations with scales belonging to the other domains; 2) the inventory was considered completed only when a five-factor structure was obtained
PCA of the Mapa ng Loob after the final item selection study N=576
Method
Method Participants: Two hundred forty-five (245) introductory psychology students from UP Diliman, 71% were female; Mean age: 19.01 (1.66) Instruments: the Mapa ng Loob and the PPP Procedure: The participants were administered the online version of the Mapa at the beginning of the semester. The PPP was administered towards the end of the semester.
Scales hypothesized to correlate Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino N1 Hina ng Loob Pagkamahinahon (-) N2 Pagkamaramdamin Pagkamaramdamin E1 Pagkamasayahin Pagkamasayahin E2 Pagkapalakaibigan Pagkapalakaibigan O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip Pagkamalikhain A1 Pagkadimayabang Pagkamapagkumbaba A3 Pagkamaunawain Pagkamaunawain C1 Pagkamasikap Pagkamasikap C3 Pagkaresponsable Pagkaresponsable NA Dalas Makaramdam ng Galit Pagkamahinahon (-) AC Pagkamatapat Pagkamatapat
The poles of Pagkamahinahon Hina ng Loob (N) Pagkamahinahon Dalas Makaramdam ng Galit (NA)
RESULTS Reliability Factor structure of the Mapa Convergent-discriminant correlations
Internal Consistency Reliability N=245 Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino SCALE SCALE Reliability Reliability N1 Hina ng Loob Pagkamahinahon (-) .70 .80 N2 Pagkamaramdamin Pagkamaramdamin .76 .72 E1 Pagkamasayahin Pagkamasayahin .81 .78 E2 Pagkapalakaibigan Pagkapalakaibigan .88 .90 O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip Pagkamalikhain .80 .76 A1 Pagkadimayabang Pagkamapagkumbaba .79 .80 A3 Pagkamaunawain Pagkamaunawain .77 .79 C1 Pagkamasikap Pagkamasikap .73 .48 C3 Pagkaresponsable Pagkaresponsable .80 .68 NA Dalas Makraramdam ng Pagkamahinahon (-) .77 .80 Galit AC Pagkamatapat Pagkamatapat .68 .69 MEAN MEAN .77 .74
PCA of the Mapa ng Loob, N=245
Validity: intercorrelation matrix Mapa PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP Hin Ram Say Kai Lik Baba Una Sik Res Hin* Tap HL -.48 .35 -.36 -.25 -.42 -.22 -.23 -.23 -.14 -.48 -.13 Ram -.59 .63 -.29 -.15 -.23 -.42 -.34 -.15 -.16 -.59 -.27 Say .12 -.19 .75 .65 .25 -.10 .26 .25 -.02 .12 .03 Kai .08 -.09 .59 .83 .33 -.16 .13 .32 .08 .08 -.00 KPI .07 .02 .20 .18 .61 -.13 -.04 .23 .04 .07 .07 Dim .31 -.43 -.11 -.24 -.02 .64 .34 -.09 .05 .31 .37 Una .46 -.44 .12 .08 .15 .47 .66 .07 .11 .46 .34 Sik .10 -.04 .20 .17 .36 .15 .14 .50 .32 .10 .26 Res .18 -.07 .21 .17 .39 .16 .11 .48 .42 .18 .25 DMG -.66 .55 -.16 -.03 -.20 -.55 -.61 -.16 -.11 -.66 -.28 Tap .27 -.31 .22 .02 .12 .44 .31 .18 .20 .27 .45
Validity: intercorrelation matrix Mapa PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP Hin Ram Say Kai Lik Baba Una Sik Res Hin* Tap HL -.48 .35 -.36 -.25 -.42 -.22 -.23 -.23 -.14 -.48 -.13 Ram -.59 .63 -.29 -.15 -.23 -.42 -.34 -.15 -.16 -.59 -.27 Say .12 -.19 .75 .65 .25 -.10 .26 .25 -.02 .12 .03 Kai .08 -.09 .59 .83 .33 -.16 .13 .32 .08 .08 -.00 KPI .07 .02 .20 .18 .61 -.13 -.04 .23 .04 .07 .07 Dim .31 -.43 -.11 -.24 -.02 .64 .34 -.09 .05 .31 .37 Una .46 -.44 .12 .08 .15 .47 .66 .07 .11 .46 .34 Sik .10 -.04 .20 .17 .36 .15 .14 .50 .32 .10 .26 Res .18 -.07 .21 .17 .39 .16 .11 .18 .25 .48 .42 ns DMG -.66 .55 -.16 -.03 -.20 -.55 -.61 -.16 -.11 -.66 -.28 Tap .27 -.31 .22 .02 .12 .44 .31 .18 .20 .27 .45
Convergent and discriminant validity correlations Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Validity Mean Pilipino coefficients |discriminant validity| N1 Hina ng Loob Pagkamahinahon (-) -.48 .26 N2 Pagkamaramdamin Pagkamaramdamin .63 .26 E1 Pagkamasayahin Pagkamasayahin .75 .21 E2 Pagkapalakaibigan Pagkapalakaibigan .83 .20 O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip Pagkamalikhain .61 .11 A1 Pagkadimayabang Pagkamapagkumbaba .64 .22 A3 Pagkamaunawain Pagkamaunawain .66 .25 C1 Pagkamasikap Pagkamasikap .50 .19 C3 Pagkaresponsable Pagkaresponsable .42 .23 NA Dalas Makaramdam ng Pagkamahinahon (-) -.66 .29 Galit AC Pagkamatapat Pagkamatapat .45 .23
Convergent validity correlations: validity coefficients Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Validity coefficients Pilipino N1 Hina ng Loob Pagkamahinahon (-) -.48 N2 Pagkamaramdamin Pagkamaramdamin .63 E1 Pagkamasayahin Pagkamasayahin .75 E2 Pagkapalakaibigan Pagkapalakaibigan .83 O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip Pagkamalikhain .61 A1 Pagkadimayabang Pagkamapagkumbaba .64 A3 Pagkamaunawain Pagkamaunawain .66 C1 Pagkamasikap Pagkamasikap .50 C3 Pagkaresponsable Pagkaresponsable .42 NA Dalas Makraramdam ng Pagkamahinahon (-) -.66 Galit AC Pagkamatapat Pagkamatapat .45
Why only a moderate correlation between N1 Hina ng Loob and PPP Pagkamahinahon?
The poles of Pagkamahinahon Hina ng Loob (N) Pagkamahinahon Dalas Makaramdam ng Galit (NA)
Why only a moderate correlation between Mapa Pagkamatapat and PPP Pagkamatapat?
Mapa Pagkamatapat = Sincerity PPP Pagkamatapat = Honesty
Why only a moderate correlation between C3 Pagkaresponsable and PPP Pagkaresponsable?
Recommend
More recommend
