sustainable utility master planning projects 15 m savings
play

Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the Village of Huntley Presented By: Timothy P. Farrell, P.E. Village of Huntley Village Engineer Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E., CFM, LEED AP Engineering Enterprises, Inc. March 24,


  1. Sustainable Utility Master Planning Projects 15+ M Savings For the Village of Huntley Presented By: Timothy P. Farrell, P.E. Village of Huntley Village Engineer Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E., CFM, LEED AP Engineering Enterprises, Inc. March 24, 2015

  2. Presentation Overview Background Information Existing Water Works & Wastewater Systems Overview Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows Regulatory Review Water Supply, Treatment & Storage Evaluation Sustainable Source Water Assessment Wastewater System Evaluation Financial Review & Summary

  3. Background Information

  4. Background Information  Village of Huntley Study Area  Boundary Agreements With Seven Neighboring Communities  Acreage Summary  Total Study Area: 21,900 Ac  Facility Planning Area: 13,330 Ac  Corporate Limits: 9,040 Ac  Large Lot Res. Area: 6,350 Ac

  5. Background Information

  6. Background Information Deferred Capacity Increases Due To Water Use Reduction 10 Required Capacity Before Conservation Downsizing Peak Demand/Capacity (MGD) Delay Existing Capacity 5 Baseline Demand After Conservation 0 2010 2020 2040 2030 Year

  7. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems Supply Treatment Storage

  8. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  Supply: Five (5) Active Deep Sandstone Water Wells [Nos. 7 – 11]  Four (4) Ironton Galesville & One (1) St. Peter (Ancell) & Ironton Galesville  Flowrate: 800 – 1,000 gpm  Exceed Radium & Barium Standards  Treatment: Five (5) WTPs  All Plants Institute Cation Exchange Treatment  One Plant Includes Force Draft Areation

  9. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  Storage:  Five (5) Elevated Water Storage Tanks (EWST) [300,000 gallon – 1,000,000 gallon]  Two (2) Detention Tanks [57,000 & 61,000 gallons]  Distribution:  4” – 16” Water Main  One Pressure Zone  Emergency Connect With LITH  Controls: SCADA System

  10. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  Wastewater Collection/Conveyance:  Sanitary Sewer Network  Fourteen (14) Lift Stations  Wastewater Treatment:  East WWTF  West WWTF

  11. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  East WWTF  Current Flow 1.1 MGD  Rated Capacity  Design Average Flow: 1.8 MGD  Design Maximum Flow: 4.5 MGD  Wastewater Treatment Trains  Screening  Secondary Biological Treatment  UV Disinfection

  12. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems  West WWTF  Current Flow 1.0 MGD  Rated Capacity  Design Average Flow: 2.6 MGD  Design Maximum Flow: 6.5 MGD  Wastewater Treatment Trains  Screening  Secondary Biological Treatment  Filtration  UV Disinfection  Extra Capacity Within Most Unit Processes

  13. Existing Water & Wastewater Systems

  14. Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows  Historical Water Use Summary (2009 – 2013)  Current Trends (CT) = 90 gpcd  MDD:ADD = 2.16  MHD:MDD = 2.00  2040 CT Water Use Projection  ADD = 5.31 MGD  MDD = 11.68 MGD  MHD = 23.36 MGD

  15. Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows  Historical Wastewater Flows (2009 – 2013)  Total Flow = 89.3 gpcd  Baseflow = 60.9 gpcd  I/I = 28.4 gpcd  2040 CT Wastewater Flow Projection  DAF = 4.69 MGD  DMF = 11.72 MGD

  16. Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows

  17. Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows Potential Estimated Water Savings From Water Conservation and Efficiency Village of Huntley, McHenry & Kane Cos., IL Water Saved % Of Total Category (MGD) (%) All Customers 0.295 5.6% Outdoor New Landscape 0.029 0.6% Utility Water - System Losses 0.316 6.0% High Efficiency Toilets (HET) 0.038 0.7% Indoor Residential High Efficiency Washing Machines (HEWM) 0.014 0.3% Retrofits 0.025 0.5% Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Customers 0.041 0.8% Total Estimated Savings = 0.759 14%

  18. Historical & Projected Water Use & Wastewater Flows

  19. Regulatory Review In Compliance? Year Regulation Enacted Yes No Compliance Status Only applies to surface water and Surface Water Treatment Rule 1989 N/A GWUDI systems System is routinely monitored as  Total Coliform Rule (TCR) 1989 required System is routinely monitored as  Lead and Copper Rule 1991 required Unregulated Contaminant System is routinely monitored as  1998 Monitoring Rule required Interim Enhanced Surface Water Only applies to surface water and 1998 N/A Treatment Rule GWUDI systems Stage 1 Disinfectant / Disinfection System is routinely monitored as  1998 Byproducts Rule required System is routinely monitored as  Radionuclides Rule 2000 required System is routinely monitored as  Arsenic Rule 2001 required System is routinely monitored as  Filter Backwash Recycling Rule 2001 required Only applies to surface water and Long Term 1 Surface Water 2002 N/A GWUDI systems with fewer than Treatment Rule 10,000 customers Long Term 2 Surface Water Only applies to surface water and 2005 N/A Treatment Rule GWUDI systems Stage 2 Disinfectant / Disinfection IDSE Completed; Compliance  2005 Byproducts Rule Monitoring Plan submitted to IEPA System is routinely monitored as  Ground Water Rule 2006 required System is routinely monitored as  Total Coliform Rule (TCR 2010) 2010 required IEMA registration required for WTP‘s and the WWTF sludge Radium Treatment Residuals  2011 disposal; Monitoring and reporting Rule required for WWTF biosolids disposal Proposed rule would set MCL at 300 pCi/L or 4,000 pCi/L with a Radon Rule Proposed N/A multimedia mitigation program to address radon in indoor air

  20. Regulatory Review  Existing Near Future Wastewater Treatment Regulations  Typical Parameters  Barium  Total P East  Receiving Streams On 303(d) WWTF List  East WWTF: Huntley Ditch - Barium, Chloride, Copper Hexachlorobenzene, Zinc & Total P West  West WWTF: South Branch WWTF Kishwaukee River (East Fork) - Chloride, Copper, D.O. & Total P

  21. Supply, Treatment & Storage Evaluation  Water Supply & Treatment Needs Assessment Calculations  Ultimate Source -3,675 gpm Capacity  Reliable Source -7,508 gpm Capacity

  22. Supply, Treatment & Storage Evaluation  Water Storage Needs Assessment Calculations  Peak Hour Storage -2.02 MG  Fire Flow  Emergency Supply -4.47 MG

  23. Sustainable Source Water Assessment Shallow Sand & Deep Sandstone Gravel Aquifer Aquifer Lake Michigan

  24. Sustainable Source Water Assessment Bedrock Hydrogeology Source: ISWS HU Wells Ancell (St. Peter) Ironton- Galesville Mt. Simon

  25. Sustainable Source Water Assessment  Mapped Wells From ISWS Database  Shallow S&G  Shallow Bedrock  Deep Sandstone  Mapped Ashmore Formation Thickness

  26. Sustainable Source Water Assessment Ancell Ancell (St. Peter) (St. Peter) Ironton- Galesville

  27. Sustainable Source Water Assessment  Deep Sandstone Regional Modeling  2040 CT Model Run – With Existing 5 Wells  Alternative 1 – CT With 8 New I/G Wells

  28. Sustainable Source Water Assessment  Deep Sandstone Regional Modeling  2040 CT Model Run – With Existing 5 Wells  Alternative 1 – CT With 8 New I/G Wells  Alternative 2 – LRI With 4 New I/G Wells

  29. Sustainable Source Water Assessment  Deep Sandstone Regional Modeling  2040 CT Model Run – With Existing 5 Wells  Alternative 1 – CT With 8 New I/G Wells  Alternative 2 – LRI With 4 New I/G Wells  Alternative 3 – CT With 4 New I/G Wells (Assumes Remaining Supply Provided By Shallow Resources

  30. Sustainable Source Water Assessment

  31. Sustainable Source Water Assessment  Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency (NSMJAWA) Background  Purchase Water Through City of Chicago  Firm System Capacity = 95 MGD  Current Peak Demand = 63 MGD  Seven Charter Northwest Suburbs Own System Capacity  Huntley Connection Considerations  Possible Upgrades To NSMJAWA Transmission Network  Approximately 14 Mi of Large Diameter Transmission Main To Get To I-90 & Rt. 47 Intersection  Huntley Transmission Network Upgrades  Additional Storage To Meet Minimum 2 Days Storage  Connection/Capacity Purchase Fees

  32. Wastewater System Evaluation  East WWTF  O&M Improvements  Replace Valves & Gates  Modify Flow Splitter Box for NW Ox Ditch  Upgrade Non-Potable Water Skid  Upgrade UV System  Add 2 nd Gravity Belt Thickener  Regulatory/Capacity Upgrades  New Chemical Feed Building For Ba & P Removal  Tertiary Filtration  Ox. Ditch Motor Upgrades, D.O. Monitoring & Internal Recycle  Effluent Flume Upgrade  Increase Raw Sewage Pump Capacity

  33. Wastewater System Evaluation  West WWTF  O&M Improvements  Ox. Ditch Drainage System Upgrade  Upgrades To RSPS No. 2  Add Belt Filter Press  Automate Controls For Aerobic Digesters  Replace Existing Comminutors/Screens  New Admin/Lab/Garage Building  Regulatory/Capacity Upgrades  Ox. Ditch Motor Upgrades & Internal Recycle  Add 2 nd Filter in Sand Filter Building B  Increase Raw Sewage Pump Capacity

Recommend


More recommend