surveys using multi modes dcss
play

Surveys Using Multi Modes (DCSS) Annemieke Luiten (CBS) and Karen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ESSnet on Data Collection for Social Surveys Using Multi Modes (DCSS) Annemieke Luiten (CBS) and Karen Blanke (Destatis) 1. The ESSnet Project DCSS Initiated by Eurostat Developing web data collection tools Implementing and


  1. ESSnet on Data Collection for Social Surveys Using Multi Modes (DCSS) Annemieke Luiten (CBS) and Karen Blanke (Destatis)

  2. 1. The ESSnet Project DCSS ‐ Initiated by Eurostat • Developing web data collection tools • Implementing and assessing the impact of mixed mode data ‐ Labor Force Survey (LFS) chosen as a concrete example ‐ Duration of the project: autumn 2012 – 2014 ‐ Consortium: • Partners (5): FI, NO, NL, UK, DE (coordinator) • Support-group-members (3): SE, DK, IT ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  3. Design LFS1 LFS2+ EU-SILC ICT Census HBS Single mode Capi 10 2 11 4 2 4 Cati 4 6 1 8 Cawi 1 Papi 8 4 7 6 5 8 Papi + other 1 1 Pap 1 1 4 3 Registry 8 Capi + registry 2 1 Cati + registry 3 3 3 2 Cati - other + registry 1 Mixed mode interviewer - interviewer Capi - Cati 2 8 4 Cati- Capi - Papi 2 2 2 1 Cati - Papi 2 1 Capi - Papi 1 1 1 Cati - capi + registry 2 4 1 1 Mixed mode interviewer - noninterviewer Capi - pap 1 1 5 Cati - pap - other 1 Cawi - cati - pap 1 Cawi - capi - papi 1 Cawi - papi 2 Papi - pap 1 1 6 Cati - capi - papi - pap 1 Cati - papi - pap Capi - papi - pap 1 Cawi - papi - pap 1 1 1 Cawi - capi - cati - registry 1 Cati - capi - pap - registry Cawi - cati - registry 1 Papi - Pap - registry - other 1 1 Cawi - capi - registry 2 Cawi - Capi - Papi - registry 1 Cawi - Capi - Cati - pap - registry 1 Mixed mode noninterview - noninterview Cawi - pap 1 4 1 Cati - pap Papi - pap Cawi - pap - registry 1

  4. Policy towards the implementation of web data collection for social statistics 6 Yes, within the next 5 years Yet, but NOT within the next 5 years 13 Not yet decided 3 No policy so far 1  More than half of NSIs have concrete CAWI plans (N=23) ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learn t

  5. Conclusions Usability & concepts ‐ Implementation of web questionnaires is possible • It’s an additional mode with pos. & neg. impact • Respondents in standard employment: no problem ‐ Challenges • Loss of interviewer has impact on conveying concepts • Length & household approach demanding • Some LFS subgroups have problems • Coding occupation & economic sector ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  6. Mode strategies (including web) 1. Sequential design; web first • Potential for substantial costs savings • However, risk of lower response rates • Challenging with fixed reference week 2. Concurrent design; respondent chooses Often used when other mode is paper • • Limits costs savings: respondents favour paper 3. Sequential design; web last • Expensive, • But offers potential to higher response rates ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  7. Mode strategies (continued) 4. Other mode in wave 1, web in second (and later) waves • May suffer from high panel attrition (NL) • But could also work out fine (Canada) • Depends on mode combination 5. Adaptive Survey Design Not one design for all cases, but decisions based • on sample unit characteristics ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  8. Web response - Web cannot (yet) be the only mode - response rates are low and biased. - Mixed mode designs on the other hand show response rates and representativeness that are similar to CAPI. - Web response rates are dependent on the design and a range of other influences - The same persons who respond in CATI / CAPI respond in web ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  9. Mode effects – Measurement errors are an important source of differences between modes in some but not all surveys. – For the LFS mode effects can mostly be explained with common weighting variables – This is not always the case: ‐ Large mode effects in the Dutch Safety Monitor have led to a restriction in the modes to web and paper ‐ In the Finnish Consumer Sentiments Survey large mode differences led to the decision not to introduce web data collection ‐ Research on the British Opinions Survey showed that mode effects can be explained, but additional auxiliary variables are necessary ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  10. Recommendations mode effects - Mode effects should be taken seriously, but not too seriously; they are one of many error sources. - We need to develop rules of thumb for choices in the survey design: - Is every sample unit subjected to the same modes, - Is it possible to adjust afterwards, - Can we stabilize findings. ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  11. Adjustment - Methods for adjusting for measurement errors can be developed but - have limitations - rely on assumptions that are difficult to verify - Mixing modes may introduce instability due to variations in response mode composition. - Even though the measurement bias in the survey estimates will not be removed, applying adjustment methods is recommended to keep the measurement bias under control. ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  12. Recommendations adjustment - Research has only just started, and further work needs to be done. - Try to prevent the necessity to adjust, by careful questionnaire design and pre-testing of questionnaires. - Auxiliary data need to be available and of good quality. These can be registry data or paradata that resemble registry information. - Time series will be compromised by the introduction of mixed mode designs ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

  13. The future – Many important challenges still remain – New challenges arise – Continuation as a Centre of Excellence? ‐ Guarantee the retaining and strengthening of the competence on modern data collection methods ‐ Coordination of the actions needed for the harmonisation of practices in the ESS. ‐ Support countries in developing efficient strategies ‐ Test other social surveys ‐ Develop general guidelines ESSnet DCSS - Lessons learnt

Recommend


More recommend