Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 Streamlining Affordable Housing JULY 19, 2018 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STATE HOUSING LAWS (JSISHL)
Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 Tonight’s Goals Review Referrals that Aim to Streamline Affordable Housing Put Referrals in the Context of New State Law (SB ‐ 35) and Local Regulations Discuss Potential Options Suggested by Staff Get Feedback from JSISHL on Potential Options and Other Ideas to Explore
Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 Referrals January 2016 (Worthington) Streamline the Permit Process for Housing Projects with a Majority or More Affordable Units 50% Affordable with 20% VLI and ELI (<50% AMI) November 28 to December 5, 2017 (Droste, Bartlett, Arreguin, Worthington) Ministerial Approval of Zoning ‐ Compliant Affordable Housing Ministerial approval of 50% Affordable with 20% VLI and ELI (<50% AMI) and non ‐ profit developers projects. Ministerial approval with appeals process and required community meeting .
Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 Referral Timing & Incentives Referrals pre ‐ date SB ‐ 35. SB ‐ 35 mandates streamlining compliant projects with 50% LI units (<80% AMI). Local ordinance (Inclusionary Housing Ordinance) requires 10% LI and 10% VLI. Our Challenge Identify incentives to attract projects with 50% VLI and ELI. SB ‐ 35 already provides ministerial approval and CEQA exemptions. Maintain local protections valued by City/community.
Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 Berkeley’s RHNA Table 1: Berkeley’s Fifth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation by Income Category Extremely Very Income Category by Low Moderate Above Moderate Low Low Percentage of AMI <30% <50% <80% <120% NA Actual Units Permitted (by year) 2017 0 10 0 0 262 2016 0 16 0 0 212 2015 0 59 17 132 326 TOTAL 0 85 17 132 800 Units Required (total) Required 0 532 442 584 1401 Remaining 0 447 425 452 601 Percent Permitted 0 16% 3.85% 22.6% 57.1% Source: HCD’s 5th Cycle Annual Progress Report Permit Summary (Updated 6/1/2018)
Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 How to Incentivize ELI and VLI Table 2: Comparison of Requirements/Incentives for Affordable Housing Inclusionary SB ‐ 35 Referral Option A Option B Required Yes No No No No Streamlined No Yes Yes Yes Yes Above Mod (>120% AMI) 80% 50% 50% 75% 65% BMR: Mod (80 ‐ 120% AMI) ‐‐ 30% ‐‐ ‐‐ BMR: LI (50 ‐ 80% AMI) 10% 50% ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ BMR: VLI (30 ‐ 50% AMI) 10% 10% ‐‐ 35% BMR: ELI (<30% AMI) ‐‐ ‐‐ 10% 25% ‐‐ BMR TOTAL (<120% AMI) 20% 50% 50% 25% 35%
Late Communications JSIAHL July 19, 2018 Guidance from JSISHL 1. Should COB pursue a parallel streamlining ordinance that incentivizes units at lower levels of affordability? Should streamlining be achieved through ministerial approvals? What incentives can we offer that are competitive with and different from SB ‐ 35? 2. What project compliance requirements should be considered in a parallel streamlining ordinance that meets the needs of the Berkeley community? Some ideas to consider: appeals and community input forums RHNA progress labor agreements historic preservation green building TDM
Recommend
More recommend
