steering group meeting 2 7 2018
play

Steering Group Meeting 2/7/2018 Proposed Green Spaces (Includes all - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rudy Parish Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Meeting 2/7/2018 Proposed Green Spaces (Includes all slides discussed on 2/7/18. Slides on other Green Spaces will be published later.) NPPF: Green Space Designation The Local Green Space


  1. Rudy Parish Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Meeting 2/7/2018 Proposed Green Spaces (Includes all slides discussed on 2/7/18. Slides on other Green Spaces will be published later.)

  2. NPPF: Green Space Designation The Local Green Space designation will not be appropriate for most green areas or open space . The designation should only be used: • where the green space is in reasonably close proximity to the community it serves; [HDC Criterion 3] • where the green area is demonstrably special to a local community and holds a particular local significance, for example because of its beauty, historic significance, recreational value (including as a playing field), tranquillity or richness of its wildlife; and [HDC Criteria 4-9] • where the green area concerned is local in character and is not an extensive tract of land. [HDC Criterion 2] To be eligible for designation a site must satisfy all s NPPF tests. HDC’s assessment process breaks the middle criteria into several sub -criteria based on the key words in the NPPF definitions.

  3. Agenda / Methodology • HDC Assessed Green Spaces – What are we considering today?  Decision: Support or Oppose HDC recommendation  Key issues supporting the NP recommendation  Identify precedents to ensure consistency across sites & lessons for NP assessed sites.  If sites have distinct sections, does each part ‘win on its own merits’? • Additional Proposals from Community Consultation  Decision: Support / Oppose designation or insufficient evidence  Key issues for each site  Specific justification for any decisions.

  4. Proposed Green Spaces HDC Assessed Sites

  5. HDC Assessed Sites  Cricket Pitch  Allotments  Land between North Side and River (Honeyman’s field etc.)*  Main Green  North Green  Belbrough Lane / Station Lane (consider in two parts)  Sexhow Lane  Hundale Gill  Churchyard* +  Rudby Farm (considered as a whole and in sub-sections)* + * Also considered later as part of a potential whole Leven Valley designation + Not discussed on 2/7/18 due to time constraints – to be discussed at next meeting

  6. Cricket Pitch: HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/014/G Key points: • HRCC supportive of designation • Area is not open access, but is used by a community based club and is used to host important community events (fireworks) • “Local significance because of recreational value.”

  7. Allotments: HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/015/G Key points: • Owned/managed by RPC • RPC supportive of designation • “Local significance because of recreational value.”

  8. Land between North Side & River Leven – HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/016/G

  9. Land between North Side & River Leven – HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/016/G • Extension proposed in consultation • Site per HDC assessment • HDC have excluded land incorporated into gardens • “Local significance because of historic, recreational and wildlife significance”

  10. North Green: HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/017/G

  11. North Green: HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/017/G • Covers all the public grassed areas • Already designated as Village Green • Owned/managed by PC • Main Green a separate designation • Includes War Memorial • “Local significance because of its beauty, recreational value and historic significance”. • Section omitted from HDC site – to be included by NP

  12. Main Green: HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/018/G

  13. Main Green: HDC Preferred Site ALT/S/073/018/G • Covers all the public grassed areas • Already designated as Village Green • Owned/managed by PC • North Green a separate designation • Local significance because of its beauty, recreational value and historic significance ”.

  14. Station Lane – HDC Preferred Area, Part of ALT/S/073/019/G

  15. Station Lane – HDC Preferred Area Part of ALT/S/073/019/G Key Points: • Open Public Access • Recreational use • “Local significance because of its recreational value”

  16. Station Lane – HDC Non Preferred Area Part of ALT/S/073/019/G

  17. Station Lane – HDC Non Preferred Area Part of ALT/S/073/019/G Key Points: • Large arable field • No Public Access • No Recreational use Points to consider • Proximity of Heritage Assets  Linden Grange & Parkland  Gardenstone Farm  Drumrauck Hall  The Old Vicarage • View to NYM National Park: ( HDC criteria 9 other features) • HDC SCA “the site to the south east of Drumrauck Hall has high visual landscape value providing a setting to the village and Drumrauck Hall

  18. Woodland between Sexhow Lane & R. Leven ALT/S/073/020/G • HDC did not include narrow steep section of the bank between road and river. • “Local Significance because of its recreational value and richness of its wildlife.”

  19. Hundale Gill – HDC Non-preferred site. ALT/S/073/022/G From private land with From public footpath From public footpath permission of resident

  20. Hundale Gill – HDC Non-preferred site. ALT/S/073/022/G Notes: • Area considered by HDC • Culverted section - not suitable for designation? • Stops at arbitrary point on Western end. • Potential extension to logical end point. • Cannot designate due to extant planning permission Key points • Local significance because of the richness of is wildlife. • HDC rejected as “not in reasonably close proximity to the community it serves as it does not have public access.” • Site is crossed by a PRoW • Para 17 of PPG “land could be considered for designation even if there is no public access (eg green areas which are valued because of their wildlife, historic significance and/or beauty ).” • Consultation evidence supports buffer zones around watercourses

  21. Proposed Green Spaces NP Assessed Sites (No HDC Assessment, but uses HDC criteria / pro-forma)

  22. NP Assessed Sites  Linden Crescent / Linden Close +  South (Pump-house)  North  Village Hall (Bowling Green, Tennis Courts, Play Area) +  Enterpen  Flagpole field  Paddock  Leven Valley (Field Only) +  Leven Valley whole area designation +  Hundale Gill near Paddocks End +  Middleton Churchyard & Play area + + Not discussed on 2/7/18 due to time constraints – to be discussed at next meeting

  23. Enterpen/Flagpole Field – No HDC Assessment Hills obscured by mist! Very little visibility in summer from footpath towards rear of Enterpen

  24. Enterpen/Flagpole Field – No HDC Assessment Hills obscured by mist!

  25. Enterpen/Flagpole Field – No HDC Assessment • Landscape Character Protection Area • Site Approved For Single Dwelling – cannot designate this part as GS. • Paddock mentioned in Heritage report recommendations. • VDS Landscape features of community importance: “ the open space adjoining Highfield providing an open vista of the Hills” HDC Comparator sites / issues • Paddock: Station Lane (both are fields with no public access) • Hundle Gill (HDC opinion no public access = “not in reasonably close proximity to the community it serves”).

Recommend


More recommend