State of Ohio 2016-2017 Local Report Card PRELIMINARY RESULTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

State of Ohio 2016-2017 Local Report Card PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Tonight’s Presentation ● Ohio’s Local Report Cards ● Our PRELIMINARY Results ● Our Commitment to Excellence ● Our Purpose ● Our Response ● Our Focus - Continuous Improvement 2

Purpose of Ohio’s Local Report Cards ● Report on the progress of districts and schools in raising achievement and preparing students for the future ● Provide one measure of district and school progress; an important source of data for districts to use in conjunction with other data ● Report on the results on state tests given to students in grades 3-8 and in select high school courses annually in the spring ● Provide a snapshot of student, school and district performance at one point in time 3

Cautions for Ohio’s Local Report Cards ● Although significant legislation surrounds the requirements for achievement testing, it remains only one source of data that is used by our staff in identifying and analyzing the strengths and areas for improvement for each and every student. ● Benchmarks to measure student performance levels have and will continue to change annually ● 2016-17 report card measures not finalized yet by ODE - COMING IN SEPTEMBER! 4

Owning Our Results Solid performance on this component, increase in PI scores Achievement B across the district. All schools PI increased. Will continue to strive for greater passage rates. Increased performance in all subgroups in Math and ELA; the district must continue its efforts in helping all Gap Closing B subgroups succeed. Progress NR Coming in September Continues to be a strong success area for the district. Graduation Rate A College Credit Plus participation, AP participation and Prepared for B scores, SAT/ACT scores and honors diploma data are Success strong; we expect continued growth in future years. 5

Achievement What is the Achievement District Results component? ● Performance Index - based on the ● Performance Index - 102.7 of 120 test results of every student, with possible points (85.6%); A 4.9 point points awarded based on the PI increase from 2015-2016. achievement level of each student. ● Indicators Met - 14 out of 24 ● Indicators Met - the number of indicators met; ODE now requires indicators the district met out of 24 80% for passage; we must continue indicators representing each test to increase student achievement and each grade level. levels 6

Achievement Comparison Data Achievement 16-17 15-16 Level Earned Untested 0.1% 0.1% Limited 5.9% 8.6% Basic 10.6% 12.9% Proficient 19.6% 22.5% Accelerated 26.5% 25.7% Advanced 26.0% 26.1% Advanced 11.2% 4.3% Plus

Achievement 2015 2016 NAPLS 2017 Indicators NAPLS State State 2015-2016 State & Beyond 2016-2017 Exam Indicators Indicators Results Grade 3 Math 65% 73% 83.8% 80% 88.4% Grade 3 ELA 80% 68% 77.8% 80% 85.5% Grade 4 Math 64% 72% 80.4% 80% 90.8% Grade 4 ELA 69% 75% 71.6% 80% 82.8% Grade 4 SS 70% 75% 88.3% 80% 93.0% Grade 5 Math 68% 74% 78.3% 80% 82.1% Grade 5 ELA 66% 73% 79.6% 80% 87.8% Grade 5 Science 62% 71% 85.7% 80% 85.8%

Achievement 2015 2016 NAPLS 2017 Indicators NAPLS State State 2015-2016 State & Beyond 2016-2017 Exam Indicators Indicators Results Grade 6 Math 67% 74% 76.7% 80% 75.1% Grade 6 ELA 68% 74% 74.9% 80% 79.1% Grade 6 SS 56% 68% 84.5% 80% 77.1% Grade 7 Math 67% 74% 39.2% 80% 71.7% Grade 7 ELA 68% 74% 74.3% 80% 81.5% Grade 8 Math 51% 66% 78.2% 80% 91.5% Grade 8 ELA 68% 74% 62.5% 80% 78.3% Grade 8 Science 60% 70% 82.3% 80% 79.6%

Achievement 2015 2016 NAPLS 2017 Indicators NAPLS State State 2015-2016 State & Beyond 2016-2017 Exam Indicators Indicators Results Algebra 1 64% 72% 80.0% 80% 79.7% Geometry 80% 80% 74.2% 80% 68.4% ELA 1 73% 77% 80.3% 80% 86.3% ELA 2 76% 78% 80.5% 80% 75.6% Biology N/A 72% 86.8% 80% 86.0% US History 71% 76% 93.7% 80% 83.8% US Government 67% 74% 91.7% 80% 92.6%

Gifted Students The gifted Indicator highlights the opportunities and performance of gifted students. District Results Gifted Value Added Value Added Grade: Not Rated Enrollment: Coming in September Value Added Met? Gifted Performance Index Performance Index: 120.540 Performance Index Met? Met 4.2 increase Gifted Inputs Total Points: 89.0 Gifted Inputs Met? Met 11

Achievement Performance Index Overall Achievement Indicators Met

Gap Closing District Results The Gap Closing component shows how well we are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. 13

Graduation Rate District Results The Graduation Rate component shows the percent of students who successfully finish high school with a diploma in four or five years. 14

K-3 Literacy The K-3 Literacy District Results component shows how New Albany-Plain Local successful NAPLS is at Schools has not been graded getting struggling readers because fewer than 5% of on track to proficiency in kindergarten students were third grade and beyond. struggling readers. 15

Prepared For Success Prepared for District Results Success shows how well prepared our students are for all future opportunities. 16

Forward Progress into 2017-2018 Highlights Focus Areas ● Increased passage rates in ● Continue to focus on aligning 15/23 testing areas daily instruction with standards ● Increased passage rates for all ● Targeted interventions to help sub-groups ALL students succeed ● Gifted PI increased in all ● Provide opportunities to extend buildings each student’s learning ● 100% of 3rd graders promoted! ● Data warehouse integration and usage

2016-17 Local Report Card Results: Elementary Schools Scott to do K-5 18

Grades 3 - 5 Highlights Grades Highlights 2-8 / 2-5 Achievement: A/B All passage rates increased for 3-5, ALL Indicators Met Gifted: Met/Met Final Indicator Rating: Coming in September! Gap Closing: B/B Exceeded goal that each building set for closing the gap with specific subgroups K-3 Literacy: A/A Progress monitoring helps identify and provide support for all readers Third Grade Reading 100%/100% 100% of 3rd grade students were promoted even with Guarantee: an increased promotion score requirement

Grades Preschool - 6th Areas of Focus ● Implementation of New Math Programs ● Review of Writing Curriculum ● Analyzing last year’s results for areas of improvement ● Action plans specific to grade level, building and subgroup needs

Local Report Card Results: Middle and High Schools 21

Grades 6 - 8 Highlights Grades Highlights MS/HS Achievement: C Middle School passage for 7th Grade Math increased 32.5 pts PI increased for MS 4.8 pts Gifted: Met MS met Gifted PI & Inputs Final Indicator Rating: Coming in September! Gap Closing: B MS increased passage for all subgroups in ELA & Math

Grades 9 - 12 Highlights Grades Highlights MS/HS Achievement: C HS increased performance index 4.6 pts Gifted: Not Met HS met Gifted Inputs increased Gifted PI 4.6 pts Final Indicator Rating: Coming in September! Gap Closing: D HS ELA stayed the same or increased Graduation Rate: A Continues to be a strong indicator Prepared for Success: B Increased number of students with Scores of 3 or higher on AP and number of students with 3 or more college credits

Grades 7 - 12 Areas of Focus ● Math Curricular Study grades 6 - 12 ● Targeted Math Intervention during an additional lab time added to student schedules. ● Utilization of Eagle period to provide additional support for individual students ● Action plans specific to grade level, building and subgroup needs, including gifted

Questions & Comments Official Results will be released in September

Curriculum Audit and Resource Study Math 6 -12 ● Use the results of the quantitative analysis of Ohio State Math Test. ● Use the item analysis for each individual test - Math 6, Math 7, Math 8, Algebra 1, Geometry

Hanover Research Project Participation ● In depth Math teacher interviews ● Best practice research ● Like district implementation of math resources ● Alignment with Bridges in Mathematics ● Vendor review of math resources

Next Steps ● Middle School/High School vertical alignment meetings twice monthly ● High School Intervention Learning Centers and Eagle period support for struggling math students ● Progress Monitor in MS/HS ● Targeted intervention for middle school students ● Common planning time for middle school math teachers ● Resource adoption by December ● Professional development ● Potential pilot of materials second semester