standards coso
play

STANDARDS/COSO 2013 INTEGRATION Benito Ybarra, Chief Audit and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TXDOT AUDIT FRAMEWORK STANDARDS/COSO 2013 INTEGRATION Benito Ybarra, Chief Audit and Compliance Officer March 2015 Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 Standards/COSO Considerations International Government Auditing


  1. TXDOT AUDIT FRAMEWORK STANDARDS/COSO 2013 INTEGRATION Benito Ybarra, Chief Audit and Compliance Officer March 2015 Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015

  2. Standards/COSO Considerations International Government Auditing Professional Standards Practices Framework COSO - Internal Federal Standards for Control Integrated Internal Control Framework Focus cus on professi sional onal aud uditin ting g standa ndards ds and internal ernal contr ntrol ol frame mewor ork equa uates es to enhanc nhanced ed value ue propos posit ition ion Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 2

  3. Strengths of Each Element Yellow Book Red Book Green Book COSO • Government • More universal • Internal control • Based on audit focus adoption focus primary Operations, • Prescriptive • Performance • Concepts Reporting and and attribute geared toward • Establishes Compliance standards accountability, competence objectives flexibility, and and • More guidance sustainability • Establishes professionalism on adding value internal control as auditor through • Leverages structure (5 requirements consulting COSO components) framework • Drives • More focus on (principles and • Outlines 17 accountability organizational attributes) contributing independence • Focus on principles • Outlines safeguards to documentation • Engages all enhance requirements organizational independence stakeholders Adaptable able and us useful ful for all stakeh eholde olders Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 3

  4. Keys to Success  Knowledge of Standards and COSO – Credibility – Selling the platform – Getting resources  Support at highest levels  Communications plan to share knowledge and benefits of COSO with mid- level management  Ability to identify staff with drive/initiative  Early successes and talking points  Courage to communicate candidly and engage in tough, results-focused conversations Advanc ncing ing the e profess ession ion takes es drive, e, patienc ence e and focu cus Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 4

  5. Benefits of Framework  Results focused on business objectives/outcomes (reporting, operational, compliance and strategic)  Risks communicated in terms of impact to key objectives  Helps engage in conversations regarding action plans that will help advance the organization (not just fixing symptoms)  Ratings help focus resource investment on most critical items  Helps management feel good about risk management, instead of compliance-only approaches  Develops staff into risk-based and more strategic members of the organization Impr mproves es overa erall l risk k mana nage geme ment nt Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 5

  6. Combining Standards and COSO Elements Planning • 2-4 weeks focused on interviews, documentation review and consideration of legal/regulatory landscape • Output is scope presentation, which includes engagement summary, control design evaluation, risk footprint, scope coverage recommendations, engagement dashboard and capacity plan • Entrance Conference at end of planning, after scope presentation meeting Execution • 4-6 weeks focused on completing audit work programs • Weekly meetings with audit management, focused on driving conclusions and ensuring client engagement/responsiveness • Weekly updates to client stakeholders • Dashboard updated on ongoing basis • Findings issued and management action plans requested Closing • 2-3 weeks focused on communication, alignment on risks/management action plans • Exit Conference, draft consolidated report issued • Meetings with Executive Management team to provide assurance, risks, findings and discuss management action plans/resource investment • Final report issued internally and externally, as required by Texas Internal Auditing Act (Sec. 2102.0091) REPORTS OF PERIODIC AUDITS. Incl cludes des plannin ning, g, managem agemen ent/client /client engageme gagement, nt, due ue diligenc gence and approp opriat riate e repor orti ting, ng, based ed on risk Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 6

  7. TxDOT Framework Outputs Audit ratings and opinions • Focused on internal controls, goal attainment and organizational risks Findings ratings and opinions • Considerate of control design, operating effectiveness and impact Engagement dashboard • Coverage, results and relative risks Annual report of enterprise metrics • Year over year comparison of internal control framework Highlights lights organiz nizati tional onal focus s and invest stments ents to drive e reason sonable able risk k managem agemen ent t frame mewor ork Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 7

  8. Internal Audit Ratings Operations Compliance PROCESS Reporting RATING Effective/Efficient with applicable laws Reliability VARIATION Use of Resources and regulations No issues or minor observations / currently Low exceeding goals / high focus on internal control Exemplary throughout organization / number of best practices and appetite for disciplined innovation Findings and/or observations / currently meeting Satisfactory goals / adequate focus on internal controls Findings and observations / not meeting some Needs goals or pose TxDOT risk / focus on internal Improvement controls can be strengthened Findings and observations / not meeting key Unsatisfactory goals and posing organizational risk / focus on High internal controls needed Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 8

  9. Enterprise Metrics – Audit and Advisory Service Reports Issued Takea eaways • Flat trend (no change Y/Y) • Issues tend to be more operating effectiveness issues, which could have been 37 Audit it and Advisory isory Service ice Repor orts s Issued sued 15 Aud udit it and Advisory isory Service ice Repor orts s Issued sued prevented and/or • Full/Limited Scope - 24 • Full/Limited Scope - 10 detected through • Risk Response - 1 • Follow-Up (Not Rated) - 4 Follow-Up (Not Rated) - 9 Advisory Service (Not Rated) - 1 • • stronger monitoring • Advisory Service (Not Rated) - 3 Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 9

  10. Example of Final Report (excerpts) Focus on effectiveness of control mechanisms, achievement of business objectives, and closure of identified control gaps/weaknesses Objective rating of program/processes; gives management outlay to consider whether investment of resources is worth it Auditor’s assessment of internal control environment Lists summary of key testing and results Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 10

  11. Example of Final Report (excerpts) Lists areas evaluated along with corresponding assessment (color) Provides management with information regarding what area(s) require improvement to ensure investment of resources makes sense. Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 11

  12. Global Recognition More e informat ormation ion available able at www.th theiia. ia.org rg Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 12

  13. Thanks! Texas Transportation Commission Training March 2015 13

Recommend


More recommend