split scope definites
play

Split-scope definites How the can mean two things at once Dylan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 05, 2023 •251 likes •1.01k views

Split-scope definites How the can mean two things at once Dylan Bumford 18 February 2016 New York University Definite description Wisdom: the NP refers to the single salient NP in the context the hat = x , where x is

  1. Split-scope definites How ‘the’ can mean two things at once Dylan Bumford 18 February 2016 New York University

  2. Definite description Wisdom: ‘the NP’ refers to the single salient ‘NP’ in the context � the hat � = x , where x is the unique relevant hat Proposal: Definite determination split into two subprocesses. � the hat � = one ( · · · ( some hat )) When things intervene, ‘the hat’ may end up one among many Payoffs: • Haddock readings • Relative superlatives • Possibly other strange readings of quantificational adjectives • Emerging uniformity in the theory of cardinal modification 1/17

  3. Definite description Wisdom: ‘the NP’ refers to the single salient ‘NP’ in the context � the hat � = x , where x is the unique relevant hat Proposal: Definite determination split into two subprocesses. � the hat � = one ( · · · ( some hat )) When things intervene, ‘the hat’ may end up one among many Payoffs: • Haddock readings • Relative superlatives • Possibly other strange readings of quantificational adjectives • Emerging uniformity in the theory of cardinal modification 1/17

  4. Definite description Wisdom: ‘the NP’ refers to the single salient ‘NP’ in the context � the hat � = x , where x is the unique relevant hat Proposal: Definite determination split into two subprocesses. � the hat � = one ( · · · ( some hat )) When things intervene, ‘the hat’ may end up one among many Payoffs: • Haddock readings • Relative superlatives • Possibly other strange readings of quantificational adjectives • Emerging uniformity in the theory of cardinal modification 1/17

  5. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  6. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  7. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  8. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  9. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  10. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite 2/17

  11. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in · · · Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  12. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in · · · Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  13. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in · · · Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  14. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in y Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  15. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in y Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  16. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in y Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  17. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  18. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  19. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  20. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  21. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  22. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  23. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in hat y 4/17

  24. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in · · · hat y 4/17

  25. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in · · · hat y 4/17

  26. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in · · · hat y 4/17

  27. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in y hat y 4/17

  28. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in y hat y 4/17

  29. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  30. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  31. Decomposing definiteness Dynamic Semantics • Denotations are sets of assignments The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process • Indefinites introduce nondeterministic referents if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  32. Decomposing definiteness Dynamic Semantics • Denotations are sets of assignments The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process • Indefinites introduce nondeterministic referents if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  33. Decomposing definiteness Dynamic Semantics • Denotations are sets of assignments The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process • Indefinites introduce nondeterministic referents if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  34. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  35. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  36. Teasing the pieces apart (6) the [rabbit in the hat] (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  37. Teasing the pieces apart some some (6) the [rabbit in the hat] one one (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  38. Teasing the pieces apart (6) one [ some rabbit in [ one [ some hat]]] (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  39. Teasing the pieces apart some some (6) the [rabbit in the hat] one one (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  40. Teasing the pieces apart some some (6) one [ one [ some rabbit in some hat]] one one (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

Recommend

Split Scope, Summative Existentials, and the Semantics of Bare Quantifiers Chris Kennedy

Split Scope, Summative Existentials, and the Semantics of Bare Quantifiers Chris Kennedy

Split Scope, Summative Existentials, and the Semantics of Bare Quantifiers Chris Kennedy University of Chicago University of Vienna 22 June, 2015 Introduction: Two semantic analysis of bare quantifiers Numerals (and their

951 views • 72 slides
An inverse linking account of nested definites Lucas Champollion 1 Uli Sauerland 2 1 University of

An inverse linking account of nested definites Lucas Champollion 1 Uli Sauerland 2 1 University of

Introduction This proposal Previous accounts Locality prediction Online survey References An inverse linking account of nested definites Lucas Champollion 1 Uli Sauerland 2 1 University of Pennsylvania / PARC 2 ZAS Sinn und Bedeutung 14

552 views • 44 slides
Splitting Germanic Negative Indefinites Dominique Blok, Lisa Bylinina, Rick Nouwen 1 Split Scope

Splitting Germanic Negative Indefinites Dominique Blok, Lisa Bylinina, Rick Nouwen 1 Split Scope

Splitting Germanic Negative Indefinites Dominique Blok, Lisa Bylinina, Rick Nouwen 1 Split Scope (1) Je hoeft geen stropdas te dragen. you must- npi tie to wear geen D You do not have to wear a tie. (2) Henk mag

467 views • 34 slides
SPL SPLIT IT CA CAST ST Installation of Split Cast Kit Split Cast Kit Rf QM 2000 2 screws

SPL SPLIT IT CA CAST ST Installation of Split Cast Kit Split Cast Kit Rf QM 2000 2 screws

SPL SPLIT IT CA CAST ST Installation of Split Cast Kit Split Cast Kit Rf QM 2000 2 screws , 2 magnets 2 split cast plates and 2 retention disks 1 : remove the nut of the screw 2 : Fixe the screws on articulator 3 : Fixe the magnets on

205 views • 9 slides
PRODUCT DECOMPOSITION Ante Rozga, University of Split, Faculty of Economics/Split - Cvite

PRODUCT DECOMPOSITION Ante Rozga, University of Split, Faculty of Economics/Split - Cvite

NEW APPROACH TO GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT DECOMPOSITION Ante Rozga, University of Split, Faculty of Economics/Split - Cvite Fiskovia 5, 21 000 Split; CROATIA e-mail: ante.rozga@efst.hr Elza Jurun, University of Split, Faculty of

595 views • 38 slides
Scope A scope is a textual region of the program in which a (name-to-object) binding is CSC

Scope A scope is a textual region of the program in which a (name-to-object) binding is CSC

Scope A scope is a textual region of the program in which a (name-to-object) binding is CSC 4181 active. Compiler Construction There are two types of scope: Static scope Scope and Symbol Table Dynamic scope Most modern

335 views • 5 slides
Optimizing over the Split Closure Optimizing over the Split Closure Anureet Saxena ACO PhD

Optimizing over the Split Closure Optimizing over the Split Closure Anureet Saxena ACO PhD

Optimizing over the Split Closure Optimizing over the Split Closure Anureet Saxena ACO PhD Student, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University. (Joint Work with Egon Balas) MIP Model MIP Model min cx Contains x j 0 j 2 N x j

837 views • 56 slides
I-65/I 65/I-70 N 70 Nor orth th Split Split Pr Project oject Public Open House October 10,

I-65/I 65/I-70 N 70 Nor orth th Split Split Pr Project oject Public Open House October 10,

I-65/I 65/I-70 N 70 Nor orth th Split Split Pr Project oject Public Open House October 10, 2018 Alter Alt erna nativ tives es De Development elopment Pr Process ocess Define Problems Balance Define Identify Context

514 views • 36 slides
Give us 4,000 -5,000 lbs and remain split from the Central Coast Meeting Goals: 1)

Give us 4,000 -5,000 lbs and remain split from the Central Coast Meeting Goals: 1)

Give us 4,000 -5,000 lbs and remain split from the Central Coast Meeting Goals: 1) Rationale for and against remaining split 2) Discussion about whether or not to split If group decides it is better to join Central Coast: 3) Background on

144 views • 13 slides
I-65/I 65/I-70 70 Nor North Split th Split Pr Project oject Noise Barrier Neighborhood

I-65/I 65/I-70 70 Nor North Split th Split Pr Project oject Noise Barrier Neighborhood

I-65/I 65/I-70 70 Nor North Split th Split Pr Project oject Noise Barrier Neighborhood Meetings October November 2019 Major P Major Project Milest oject Milestones ones September 2017 Project Initiation May 2018

446 views • 26 slides
Multidimensional scaling and flat split systems Monika Balvoi ut e joint work with

Multidimensional scaling and flat split systems Monika Balvoi ut e joint work with

Multidimensional scaling and flat split systems Monika Balvoi ut e joint work with David Bryant University of Otago 6th Nov 2014 1 / 28 Splits and Split systems A split S = A | B is a bipartition of a set of taxa X into two non empty

1.07k views • 68 slides
Split Rock to Lakefield Junction 345 kV Transmission Line SD PUC Docket No. EL05-023 Split

Split Rock to Lakefield Junction 345 kV Transmission Line SD PUC Docket No. EL05-023 Split

Split Rock to Lakefield Junction 345 kV Transmission Line SD PUC Docket No. EL05-023 Split Rock to Lakefield Junction 345 kV Project Brandon, SD to Lakefield, MN 86 Mile 345 kV line 9.6 Miles in SD Expansion of Split Rock

604 views • 13 slides
STAGE 2 AREAS OF CONCENTRATION Scope Whats in scope and whats not in scope

STAGE 2 AREAS OF CONCENTRATION Scope Whats in scope and whats not in scope

STAGE 2 AREAS OF CONCENTRATION Scope Whats in scope and whats not in scope Write data What gets written to the RIB Events/Notifications What gets channeled from I2RS Agent to Controller Scale Whats needed

625 views • 13 slides
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements: Exciting Estate Planning Opportunities What Allows

Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements: Exciting Estate Planning Opportunities What Allows

Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements: Exciting Estate Planning Opportunities What Allows Split-Dollar to Function So Well Presented by: Richard L. Harris, CLU AEP TEP Split-Dollar Basics CONSIDER THIS: Take a dollar bill and cut it in

663 views • 23 slides
PANDAROOT RON KRIPK 1 SPLIT OFFS In some cases a secondary maximum is created a few

PANDAROOT RON KRIPK 1 SPLIT OFFS In some cases a secondary maximum is created a few

STUDY OF SPLIT-OFF EVENTS IN PANDAROOT RON KRIPK 1 SPLIT OFFS In some cases a secondary maximum is created a few crystals away from the impinging point of the primary photon The currently used algorithm usually reconstructs these

515 views • 19 slides
CS 360 Programming Languages Day 11 Lexical Scope What is scope? The scope of a

CS 360 Programming Languages Day 11 Lexical Scope What is scope? The scope of a

CS 360 Programming Languages Day 11 Lexical Scope What is scope? The scope of a variable is the region of a computer program where that variable can be used. (You know this.) Why do we care? (You may not know this.)

652 views • 34 slides
Split Estate Private Surface / Public Minerals What Does it Mean to You? 2006 Overview of

Split Estate Private Surface / Public Minerals What Does it Mean to You? 2006 Overview of

Split Estate Private Surface / Public Minerals What Does it Mean to You? 2006 Overview of Presentation Why Were the Surface and Mineral Estates, Split? Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 1835 and a Report to Congress Our Task

681 views • 34 slides
Intrinsic Schreier split extensions Andrea Montoli Diana Rodelo Tim van der Linden Centre for

Intrinsic Schreier split extensions Andrea Montoli Diana Rodelo Tim van der Linden Centre for

Intrinsic Schreier split extensions Andrea Montoli Diana Rodelo Tim van der Linden Centre for Mathematics of the University of Coimbra University of Algarve, Portugal CT2019 Intrinsic Schreier split extnesions 1 / 14 Schreier (split)

1.1k views • 109 slides
A presentation of the book Schreier split epimorphisms in monoids and in semirings by D. Bourn,

A presentation of the book Schreier split epimorphisms in monoids and in semirings by D. Bourn,

A presentation of the book Schreier split epimorphisms in monoids and in semirings by D. Bourn, N. Martins-Ferreira, A. Montoli, and M. Sobral 24 January 2014 Universidade de Coimbra Outline Introduction Schreier split epimorphisms in

1.03k views • 65 slides
GlusterFS: Arbiter based replication Without 3x storage cost + zero split-brains! Ravishankar N.

GlusterFS: Arbiter based replication Without 3x storage cost + zero split-brains! Ravishankar N.

GlusterFS: Arbiter based replication Without 3x storage cost + zero split-brains! Ravishankar N. Software Engineer, Red Hat April 20 th , VAULT- 2016 Agenda Introduction to replicate (AFR) volumes in gluster Split-brains in replica

759 views • 22 slides
The Phonics Challenge danger Dec ecod oding ng Qu Quiz church 1 minute rain Split the

The Phonics Challenge danger Dec ecod oding ng Qu Quiz church 1 minute rain Split the

The Phonics Challenge danger Dec ecod oding ng Qu Quiz church 1 minute rain Split the words into individual sounds. The first word has been completed for you. coat split prool tord away darps steck jound complaint flinker

131 views • 10 slides
Training Resources via Remote Split Operations Lt Col Juan Torres Det 520/CC May 18 This

Training Resources via Remote Split Operations Lt Col Juan Torres Det 520/CC May 18 This

Leveraging Limited Range and Training Resources via Remote Split Operations Lt Col Juan Torres Det 520/CC May 18 This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Overview USAF MQ-9 Operations Formal Training Pipeline Remote Split Ops Training 2

557 views • 17 slides
Theories within Theories Berislav Zarni c Physics and Philosophy, Split, July 2012

Theories within Theories Berislav Zarni c Physics and Philosophy, Split, July 2012

Theories within Theories Berislav Zarni c Physics and Philosophy, Split, July 2012 University of Split, Croatia (Hrvatska) Theories within Theories 1 / 23 Overview In this talk I will try to sketch the grounds for repositioning

507 views • 23 slides
Your Brain v.s. a Banana Split: The Art of Mindful Ea:ng

Your Brain v.s. a Banana Split: The Art of Mindful Ea:ng

Your Brain v.s. a Banana Split: The Art of Mindful Ea:ng Jovan Duvall Jane Riebold Gabrielle Rowston Lyne6e Iseli Food and Your Feelings The Power

283 views • 11 slides

More recommend