southwest arterial southwest arterial dmats presentation
play

Southwest Arterial Southwest Arterial DMATS Presentation Project - PDF document

Southwest Arterial Southwest Arterial DMATS Presentation Project Status Update Robert Schiesl Assistant City Engineer PURPOSE OF MEETING Review current project status Inform you of the results and recommendations of the preliminary


  1. Southwest Arterial Southwest Arterial DMATS Presentation Project Status Update Robert Schiesl Assistant City Engineer PURPOSE OF MEETING � Review current project status � Inform you of the results and recommendations of the preliminary design VE evaluations � Inform you of the proposed design modifications � Project schedule � Project schedule � Receive your input and comments 1

  2. Southwest Arterial Project PROJECT PARTNERSHIP The #1 Surface Transportation Priority in the Dubuque Area For: � Dubuque City Council � Dubuque County Board of Supervisors � Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (DMATS) � Greater Dubuque Development Corporation � Dubuque Area Chamber of Commerce Continuing to move forward with the development of the Southwest Arterial Southwest Arterial Project Project Development • Connects U.S. Hwy 20 with U.S. Hwy 61/151 • 4-lane Divided Freeway (6.1 Miles) • Priority 1 Access Control • Three Interchanges � Hwy 20, Hwy 61/151, N. Cascade Road H 20 H 61/151 N C d R d • Full Build Cost Estimate $125 Million 2

  3. Southwest Arterial Project Corridor Alignment Map Southwest Arterial Project Where Are We Today? � NEPA Clearance - Completed 2004 � Preliminary Engineering Design - Completed 2008 � Preliminary Engineering Design Completed 2008 • Final Engineering Design � Underway • Right-of-Way Property Acquisition � Underway • Archaeological & Cultural Resource Mitigation � Underway • Construction � Under Contract - N. Cascade Reconstruction 3

  4. Southwest Arterial Project Value Engineering (VE) Study Preliminary Design Evaluation & Recommendations • Value Engineering Study - Completed December, 2009 g g y p , � Identify potential modifications that might decrease construction cost � Increase the value of the project • Preliminary VE design evaluation - Completed November, 2010 • 10 - Initial VE Alternatives were evaluated � 7 - VE Concepts Recommended For Further Consideration � Potential total estimated VE savings: $7,500,000 � 3 - VE Concepts Not Recommended • Most significant VE recommendations are the proposed modifications to the SW Arterial / U.S. 20 / Seippel Road interchange area. Potential savings $6,200,000 Original US 20 Interchange Cross Over Cross Over Bridge 4

  5. US 20 Interchange - Concept A Evaluated Not Recommended • Folded diamond with loop ramps • Eliminate Cross Over Bridge over US20 Bridge over US20 • Wetland Impacts • Exit Loop Ramp Speed Deceleration Bottom of Hill Safety Concern • Entry Loop Ramp Slow Entry Speed Slow Entry Speed Merging Traffic Safety Concern US 20 Interchange - Concept A Evaluated Not Recommended • Folded diamond with loop ramps • Eliminate Cross Over Bridge over US20 Bridge over US20 • Wetland Impacts • Exit Loop Ramp Speed Deceleration Bottom of Hill Safety Concern • Entry Loop Ramp Slow Entry Speed Slow Entry Speed Merging Traffic Safety Concern 5

  6. US 20 Interchange - Concept A Evaluated Not Recommended • Folded diamond with loop ramps • Eliminate Cross Over Bridge over US20 Bridge over US20 • Wetland Impacts • Exit Loop Ramp Speed Deceleration Bottom of Hill Safety Concern • Entry Loop Ramp Slow Entry Speed Slow Entry Speed Merging Traffic Safety Concern US 20 Interchange - Concept A Evaluated Not Recommended • Folded diamond with loop ramps • Eliminate Cross Over Bridge over US20 Bridge over US20 • Wetland Impacts • Exit Loop Ramp Speed Deceleration Bottom of Hill Safety Concern • Entry Loop Ramp Slow Entry Speed Slow Entry Speed Merging Traffic Safety Concern 6

  7. US 20 Interchange - Concept C Evaluated Not Recommended • Mixed configuration: Standard diamond with a folder diamond / loop ramp • Eliminate Cross Over • Eliminate Cross Over Bridge over US20 • Avoids Environmental Impacts • Entry Loop Ramp Lower Entry Speed Merging Traffic Safety Concern US 20 Interchange - Concept C Evaluated Not Recommended • Mixed configuration: Standard diamond with a folder diamond / loop ramp • Eliminate Cross Over • Eliminate Cross Over Bridge over US20 • Avoids Environmental Impacts • Entry Loop Ramp Lower Entry Speed Merging Traffic Safety Concern 7

  8. US 20 Interchange - Concept B Recommended Original US 20 Interchange Cross Over Cross Over Bridge 8

  9. Design US 20 Interchange - Concept B Revisions Recommended • Change to standard “diamond interchange” configuration • Simple, safe interchange • Eliminate loop ramps • Eliminate crossover bridge over US 20 • US20 Entry Ramps Higher entry speeds Improve Merge Traffic • US20 Exit Ramps Less Deceleration • Use roundabout intersections • Reduce environmental and property impacts • Reduce project cost by approx. $6.2 million Design US 20 Interchange - Concept B Revisions Recommended • Change to standard “diamond interchange” configuration • Simple, safe interchange • Eliminate loop ramps • Eliminate crossover bridge over US 20 • US20 Entry Ramps Higher entry speeds Improve Merge Traffic • US20 Exit Ramps Less Deceleration • Use roundabout intersections • Reduce environmental and property impacts • Reduce project cost by approx. $6.2 million 9

  10. Design US 20 Interchange - Concept B Revisions Recommended • Change to standard “diamond interchange” configuration • Simple, safe interchange • Eliminate loop ramps • Eliminate crossover bridge over US 20 • US20 Entry Ramps Higher entry speeds Improve merge traffic • US20 Exit Ramps Less deceleration Improved safety • Use roundabout intersections • Reduce environmental and property impacts • Reduce project cost by approx. $6.2 million Design US 20 Interchange - Concept B Revisions Recommended • Change to standard “diamond interchange” configuration • Simple, safe interchange • Eliminate loop ramps • Eliminate crossover bridge over US 20 • US20 Entry Ramps Higher entry speeds Improve merge traffic • US20 Exit Ramps Less deceleration Improved safety • Use roundabout intersections • Reduce environmental and property impacts • Reduce project cost by approx. $6.2 million 10

  11. N. Cascade Road / English Mill Design Interchange Layout Revisions • Diamond interchange • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate loop ramp Eliminate loop ramp • Reduce property impacts by approx. 9 acres • Reduce project cost by approx. $240,000 • VE Alternative Eliminate interchange Eliminate interchange No at-grade intersections Priority 1 access control N. Cascade Road / English Mill Design Interchange Layout Revisions • Diamond interchange • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate loop ramp Eliminate loop ramp • Reduce property impacts by approx. 9 acres • Reduce project cost by approx. $240,000 • VE Alternative Eliminate interchange Eliminate interchange No at-grade intersections Priority 1 access control 11

  12. N. Cascade Road / English Mill Design Interchange Layout Revisions • Diamond interchange • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate loop ramp Eliminate loop ramp • Reduce property impacts by approx. 9 acres • Reduce project cost by approx. $240,000 • VE Alternative Eliminate interchange Eliminate interchange No at-grade intersections Priority 1 access control N. Cascade Road / English Mill Design Interchange Layout Revisions • Diamond interchange • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate loop ramp Eliminate loop ramp • Reduce property impacts by approx. 9 acres • Reduce project cost by approx. $240,000 • VE Alternative Eliminate interchange Eliminate interchange No at-grade intersections Priority 1 access control 12

  13. N. Cascade Road / English Mill Design Interchange Layout Revisions • Diamond interchange • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate loop ramp Eliminate loop ramp • Reduce property impacts by approx. 9 acres • Reduce project cost by approx. $240,000 • VE Alternative Eliminate interchange Eliminate interchange No at-grade intersections Priority 1 access control Military Road Area Revisions • Eliminate retaining walls • Provide landscaped cut slopes on both sides of Southwest Arterial • Requires additional property acquisition Original Tiered Wall Concept • Reduce project cost by approx. $2 Million • Added bike / pedestrian trail between Military Road and US 151 / 61 • VE Alternative Construct tunnel Cost prohibitive Landscaped Slopes Recommended 13

  14. Design Revisions • Folded diamond with loop ramps • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate 2 bridges on ramps, switch to box culvert • Added bike / pedestrian trail through interchange to Old Davenport Road • Reduce project cost by approx. $400,000 US 151 / 61 Interchange Layout Design Revisions • Folded diamond with loop ramps • Use roundabout intersections • Eliminate 2 bridges on ramps, switch to box culvert • Added bike / pedestrian trail through interchange to Old Davenport Road • Reduce project cost by approx. $400,000 US 151 / 61 Interchange Layout 14

Recommend


More recommend