South East Europe Transnational Programme ORIENTGATE Kick- off meeting Szentendre, 17 th - 18 th September 2012
Content � SEE Programme: area, strategy, objectives, priorities… � Strategic CfP: why? � Process of strategic project generation � Specific Programme expectations
The Programme’s strategy EU Member States: Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania Non-EU-member States: Albania, Bosnia- Herzegovina, Croatia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine (Italy and Ukraine do not participate with its whole territory)
The Programme’s strategy SEE S.W.O.T. Cohesion Policy Analysis GLOBAL PROGRAMME OBJECTIVE Territorial Cooperation
The Programme’s strategy Global objective Specific objectives Priority Axes Facilitation of innovation, entrepreneurship, knowledge economy and information society P1: Facilitation of innovation and by concrete cooperation action and visible Improvement of the territorial, entrepreneurship results economic and social integration process and contribution to P2: Protection and improvement of the cohesion , stability and Improvement of the attractiveness of regions environment competitiveness through the and cities taking into account sustainable development of transnational development, physical and knowledge P3: Improvement of the accessibility partnerships and joint actions on accessibility and environmental quality by matters of strategic importance integrated approaches and concrete P4: Development of transnational synergies cooperation action and visible results for sustainable growth areas P5: Technical assistance to support Foster integration by supporting balanced implementation and capacity building capacities for transnational territorial cooperation at all levels Promotion of Promotion of equal opportunities sustainable and non discrimination development Application of EU principles
The Programme’s strategy Projects Specific objectives Priority Axes Facilitation of innovation, entrepreneurship, knowledge economy and information society P1: Facilitation of innovation and by concrete cooperation action and visible entrepreneurship results P2: Protection and improvement of the Improvement of the attractiveness of regions environment and cities taking into account sustainable development, physical and knowledge P3: Improvement of the accessibility accessibility and environmental quality by integrated approaches and concrete P4: Development of transnational synergies cooperation action and visible results for sustainable growth areas P5: Technical assistance to support Foster integration by supporting balanced implementation and capacity building capacities for transnational territorial cooperation at all levels
The Priority Axis 1 The Priority Axis 1 Priority Axis 1: 1.1. Develop technology Technological cooperation in specific Facilitation of and innovation technology fields; focusing more on Innovation and networks in specific processes than products Entrepreneurship fields Objective is to facilitate innovation, 1.2. Develop the enabling Addressing structural deficits especially entrepreneurship, environment for in the SME sector such as missing knowledge economy and innovative access to knowledge, bad to enhance integration entrepreneurship roads to market, low level of and economic relations in Internationalization the cooperation area 1.3. Enhance the Strengthening the enabling framework conditions and innovation environment at pave the way for innovation the governance level and promotion of public awareness for innovation
The Priority Axis 2 The Priority Axis 2 The Priority Axis 2 2.1. Improve integrated Development of transnational structures water management and and tools for an integrated management Priority Axis 2: flood risk prevention of water and flood risk prevention Protection and Improvement of the 2.2. Improve prevention of Transnational structures and Environment environmental and systems/tools for environmental risk technological risks protection, and policy development to Objective is to override reduce risks and impacts on human the constraints imposed health, biodiversity and other by natural barriers, to environmental issues foresee future environmental threats 2.3. Promote cooperation in Cooperation and know-how transfer in and opportunities and to management of natural managing natural assets and develop common assets and protected areas transnational awareness building on transnational actions for natural assets as development factor the protection of 2.4. Promote energy and Coordination and transfer of know-how nature and humans resource efficiency on energy and resource efficiency policies, to cover the expected rise in energy demand and resources consumption
The Priority Axis 3 The Priority Axis 3 The general objectives 3.1. Improve coordination in Provision of tools and space for promoting, planning and coordinated promoting, planning and operation for primary and operation for primary and secondary Priority Axis 3: secondary transportation transportation networks. Improvement of the networks Accessibility 3.2. Develop strategies to The support of joint initiatives to lessen the tackle the “digital divide” “digital divide” among states and regions Objective is the promotion especially where market failure is evident of coordinated preparation or expect for the development of accessibility networks and 3.3. Improve framework The support of multi –modal platforms and the support of multi- conditions for multi modal the promotion of alternative transport modality platforms means (e.g. rail or sea compared to road) from the view of public interest
The Priority Axis 4 The Priority Axis 4 Priority Axis 4: 4.1. Tackle crucial problems Tackle the high concentration of Development of affecting metropolitan areas economic, environmental, social and transnational synergies and regional systems of governance problems affecting for sustainable growth settlements metropolitan areas and regional systems areas of settlements 4.2. Promote a balanced Take up the chances which the Objective is to implement pattern of attractive and optimization of the given polycentric integrated strategies for accessible growth areas structure offer metropolitan areas and regional systems of 4.3. Promote the use of Inclusion of of cultural values as an settlements, work towards cultural values for integral part of the programme area in polycentric structures in development the planning and development the programme area and processes of urban centres, systems of use cultural values for settlements and surrounding rural areas sustainable development
Strategic CfP – Why? � Inherent to Programme life-cycle (filling the gaps...) 1st CfP: „Open” (... But some themes or AoI were insufficiently addressed) › 2nd CfP: „Open-targeted” (... limited to certain thematic fields/AoI, but › some gaps remained) 3rd CfP: „Strategic” (targeted at certain topics of outstanding relevance) › 4th CfP: “Open” › � Effective Stakeholder mobilization � Achieving a better SEE-coverage � Broader policy- and ETC context
Strategic project generation � „Top-down” approach to properly address SEE needs and key- stakeholders Elaboration of „Background Study” (current needs and policy trends) › Elaboration of ToR related to strategic topics / AoI › 1 st strategic workshop (Dubrovnik, July 2010) › 2 nd strategic workshop (Thessaloniki, September 2010) › 3 rd strategic workshop (Belgrade, April 2011) › 2-step application procedure with „coached” 2nd step › � Result: Each ToR was successfully addressed by at least one project, in three cases two proposals were approved under the same ToR
Strategic project generation Open (bottom up) CfP Strategic (Top down) CfP SEE OP SEE OP Experts Key- stakeholders Background study Project1 Project2 ToR 2 Project3 Project1 Project2 Programme Manual + Call Announcement Programme Manual + Call Announcement
Approved projects ToR3.1 ToR1 RAIL4SEE ClusterPoliSEE ToR3.2 ADB-Multiplatform ToR2 ToR4 ORIENTGATE MMWD ToR3.2 GIFT ToR2 ToR4 SEERISK SEEMIG
Strategic CfP – SEE expectations � Strong commitment of all actors (Project Partners, Programme Authorities, Stakeholders, etc..) to the achievement of project’s objectives � High quality performance of the cooperation within the partnership Commitment › Respecting time-frame (especially in view of spending...) › Strong territorial impact › � Sense of responsibility – ownership of the project and the SEE programme � High quality transnational project management � Communication! � Effective and relevant results
Alessandra Pala SEE Joint Technical Secretariat pala@southeast-europe.net
Recommend
More recommend
