solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus
play

Solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus inerea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus inerea procesului de selec ie a revistelor n Romnia Massimiliano Carloni Bucharest, 26 th April 2017 AGENDA 1. A bit of History 2. The Clarivate Strategy 3. Emerging Source


  1. Processing - Affiliation Istitutional Name Identification 1 In WoS- CC more than 6,000 istitutions are carefully unified: this harmonizes the different ways an institution name is stated into one “organisation enhanced” preferred name, creating a list of variances and a set of rules. CNRS, for instance, has hundreds of variances and thousands of rules Nothing comparable exists

  2. Processing - Affiliation Istitutional Name Identification 2 Unification Rules are built and validated in collaboration with institutions. The procedure leverages many data elements from each publication through semi-automated process as well as the collaboration with the organisations.

  3. Processing - Authors Author Name Disambiguation In 2008 “Full Author Authors and their Names” have been address affiliations introduced in lieu of “Block Names” (last are linked together name + first name since 2008 initial) The correct way to Names are write an author name, ambiguous is the following Almost 200 million authorships format: Last name, (Eastern countries, in WOS Core Collection. First name / First Spain, etc … ) initial Need of methods able to scale up millions of papers.

  4. Processing - Authors Author Name Disambiguation More data points. A machine learning (assigning weights) algorithm

  5. Processing - Authors Author Name Disambiguation Distinct Author Sets

  6. Author Identifiers + 830,000 ResearcherID profiles + 15,000 RID monthly growth rate +8,400,000 WoS-CC records with a RID

  7. Author Identifiers + 3,000,000 ORCID profiles + 85,000 ORCID monthly growth rate +7,700,000 WoS-CC records with an ORCID

  8. Author Identifiers – RID adoption (TOP 10 countries)

  9. Author Identifiers – RID adoption Romania is 24 th in the world for what concerns RID adoption

  10. Processing – Funding agencies Funding data unification As usual it’s a Around 700 Funding agencies collaborative funding agencies could act as Funding effort. A funding have been unified affiliations unification is unification file is with the possibility (intramural currently available available for to exploit a on InCites 2.0. activities) or doublecheck and hierarchical funded bodies . validation. structure.

  11. Processing – Other Open Access Key world plus All journals indexed on DOAJ For each article some keyword (Directory of Open Access metadata are added looking at the Journals) are flagged as Open titles of references cited by the Access (following the gold road). article.Especially important for Especially important for retrieving discoverability when author articles free of charge for the keywords are missing readers Multidisciplinary re-classification In InCites all articles belonging to the “multidisciplinary” categories are possibly reassigned to a not “multidisciplinary” category looking at the cited references (more stable respect to the citations). Especially important for evaluation purposes

  12. Processing – Citations Data cleansing (article, citation counts...) Unique Cited Title Citation Aggregation Citation Variants JIF is a reflection of the citation performance of a journal as a whole unit, not as an assembly of diverse published items “ Currently, the Thomson Reuters production system includes over 210,000 variant title entries , for the resolution of citations to nearly 30,000 current and historic preferred titles. The average entry for a covered journal contains 10 variants, but approximately 1% of preferred titles require more than 50 variants ”

  13. Indexing – Cited References Errors are quite common when dealing with citations (i.e. bibliographic data) “Journal names and ISSN have been thoroughly standardized in the WoS, but only partially in SCOPUS. Volume, issue and pages are more standardized in the WoS than in SCOPUS ”

  14. 11,365

  15. Journal Citation Reports – Impact Factor 2015 Impact Factor: Ratio of citations from 2015 to citable items published in 2013-2014 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  16. Which citations are we taking in consideration?

  17. Journal Citation Reports – Evolution

  18. Journal Citation Reports – Transparency

  19. Journal Citation Reports – Analyse & Compare

  20. Understand the difference between categories Journal rankings and comparisons are meaningful only within each category (not between categories).

  21. Understand the difference between categories

  22. A complete set of metrics

  23. Be aware of Imitations

  24. Have all WoS- CC journals an Impact Factor ?

  25. JCR vs WoS-CC 3 years needed for IF Arts & Humanities ESCI JCR us Name Changes WoS Self-citations & Stacking http://ipscience-help.thomsonreuters.com/incitesLiveJCR/JCRGroup/titleSuppressions.html

  26. Suppressed Titles (Self Citation)

  27. Suppressed Titles (Stacking)

  28. Processing – Citations Citation Normalization Discipline Time Document Type citation patterns citations accrue citations vary by vary by subject over time and at document type category different rates For accurate and fair research assessment, citation data have to be normalized by discipline, year and publication type. For each article, the EXPECTED CITATION RATE is first calculated, then the normalized indicators.

  29. Field Baselines/Percentiles – Essential Science Indicators

  30. ESI TOP PAPERS – Essential Science Indicators

  31. HIGHLY CITED RESEARCHERS

  32. RESEARCH FRONTS

  33. Some figures for Romania

  34. Top Romanian Journals by IF

  35. Top Romanian Journals by Average Percentile

  36. Top Journals by publications of Romanian Authors 2006-2016

  37. Top Journals by publications of Romanian Authors

  38. Top OA Journals by publications of Romanian Authors Trend

  39. In Which Journals Romanian Authors outperform average >100 papers

  40. Journal Normalized Citation Impact

  41. Article Level Metrics

  42. Upload a Dataset

  43. Local Journal Utilization Report

  44. Do you know which are the most cited chemical journals by your authors ?

  45. Unvaluable support for your selection 2011-2016 ESI CHEMISTRY

  46. ENDNOTE – Publish your paper Use the built-in bibliography maker to Search thousands of online databases create and format cita7ons in over directly or use direct export from research 6,000+ styles. database tool Share your research with colleagues and team members across departments or across the world. Organize and store your publica7on lists, PDFs, notes. Sync and access across Windows, Mac and iPad. Product Details: http://endnote.com

  47. ENDNOTE is not a single product

  48. ENDNOTE – Manuscript Matcher New Journal Matching Feature suggests top candidates for manuscript submission. Sophisticated algorithm utilizes the following for journal recommendations: • Title • Abstract • References (Optional) Leverages meticulously indexed data from thousands of journals indexed within the Web of Science MANUSCRIPT MATCHER PRODUCT DETAILS: http://endnote.com/product-details/manuscript-matcher

  49. ENDNOTE – Manuscript Matcher Submit Manuscript to Journal Publisher Current JCR Impact Factor & 5-yr Impact Factor Provide Feedback on Suggestions Match Score Prioritizes Journals Suggested Journal Access Journal Details via Publisher Name Open-Access Journal View Similar Articles Indicator within Suggested Journal

  50. ENDNOTE – Manuscript Matcher Top Keywords Ranked Access JCR Categories Rank in Category Quartile in Category Journal Publisher Details Displayed

Recommend


More recommend