solana vista elementary school reconstruction project
play

Solana Vista Elementary School Reconstruction Project Boa Board - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solana Vista Elementary School Reconstruction Project Boa Board Meeti ting Ma May 23, 2019 Meeting Agenda u California Environmental Quality Act u Proposed Project u Findings of Initial Environmental Review u Public Comments 2 What is CEQA?


  1. Solana Vista Elementary School Reconstruction Project Boa Board Meeti ting Ma May 23, 2019

  2. Meeting Agenda u California Environmental Quality Act u Proposed Project u Findings of Initial Environmental Review u Public Comments 2

  3. What is CEQA? Ca Californ ornia Environ onme mental Qu Quality Ac Act Required for a “project” that may result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines §15378) 3

  4. What is CEQA (cont.) u Informs decision makers and public on the proposed project and its impacts on the physical environment u Provides an opportunity for the public and local/state agencies to comment on the environmental impacts u Identifies feasible ways to avoid or reduce potentially significant environmental damage u Discloses significant and unavoidable impacts 4

  5. Limitations of CEQA u Unable to Fix Existing Environmental Issues u Only Evaluates Impacts of the Project u Can Only Modify a Project if Significant Impacts are Discovered 5

  6. Project Overview Project Size: approx. 10 acres § Reconstruction § Building Replacement § Addition of 19 Parking Stalls § Improve Drop-off/Pick-up Zones § Improve On-Site Circulation § Reduction in School size by two classrooms § Construction Schedule § Construction Commences - June 2020 § Ready for Student Occupancy - August 2021 § Multi-Purpose Building. Student Service Kitchen, and Fields - Fall/Winter 2021 § Proposed Temporary Project Elements § K-2 Students to be transported to Solana Highlands for the 2020-21 School Year § (3 rd ) Third Grade to attend Skyline School 2020-21 School Year § 6

  7. Aerial View 7

  8. Site Plan 6/7/18 8

  9. Types of Impacts u No No Impact No environmental impact found u Less Than Sign gnificant Impact Impact that does not exceed the CEQA defined thresholds of significance; no mitigation required u Less Than Sign gnificant Impact with Mitigation In Incor orpor orated ed Impact that may exceed the CEQA established thresholds of significance; but can be mitigated to a level of less than significant. 9

  10. Environmental Issues Considered in Initial Study u Aesthetics u Land Use / Planning u Agriculture / Forestry u Mineral Resources Resources u Noise u Air Quality u Population / Housing u Biological Resources u Public Services u Cultural Resources u Recreation u Energy u Transportation u Geology / Soils u Greenhouse Gas Emissions u Tribal Cultural Resources u Hazards / Haz. Materials u Utilities / Service Systems u Hydrology / Water Quality u Wildfire 10

  11. Environmental Issues With Mitigation in Initial Study u Aesthetics u Land Use / Planning u Agriculture / Forestry u Mineral Resources Resources u Noise u Air Quality u Population / Housing u Biological Resources u Public Services u Cultural Resources u Recreation u Energy u Transportation u Geology / Soils u Tribal Cultural Resources u Greenhouse Gas Emissions u Utilities / Service Systems u Hazards / Haz. Materials u Wildfire u Hydrology / Water Quality 11

  12. Example Mitigation Measures u Monitoring for cultural resources u Monitoring for paleontological resources u Monitoring for Tribal resources u Follow recommendations of soil engineer 12

  13. Traffic Study Area Based on the calculated project trip generation and distribution, the following intersections and roadway segments were selected for analysis: In Intersect ctions u 1. Santa Carina & Santa Victoria u 2. Santa Cecelia & Santa Victoria u 3. Santa Bartola & Santa Victoria Ro Roadway ay Segment u Santa Victoria from Santa Carina to Santa Helena 13

  14. Results of Traffic Analysis u The project does not significantly impact any of the study intersections or roadway segment. u The study intersections and roadway segment, operate acceptably for Existing Year (2018) and Opening Year (2021) with Project scenarios. u With no significant environmental impacts, there are no mitigation measures. u The project will accommodate the existing vehicle queue. 14

  15. Process u Administrative Draft Underway u Public Draft June 1, 2019 u Public Review Period June 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 u Response to Comments July u Board Consideration August 8, 2019 15

  16. Questions and Comments

Recommend


More recommend