socalgas non study costs for em v activities
play

SoCalGas Non-Study Costs for EM&V Activities 2018 SoCalGas 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SoCalGas Non-Study Costs for EM&V Activities 2018 SoCalGas 1 2017 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Labor - Non- $178,294 $46,543 $48,941 $59,759 $71,558 Admin Labor - Admin $70,743 $28,857 $29,365 $36,453 $30,075 $5,302 $240 $467 $5,934 $443


  1. SoCalGas Non-Study Costs for EM&V Activities 2018 SoCalGas 1 2017 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Labor - Non- $178,294 $46,543 $48,941 $59,759 $71,558 Admin Labor - Admin $70,743 $28,857 $29,365 $36,453 $30,075 $5,302 $240 $467 $5,934 $443 Travel & Training Technical Advisors $108,204 $22,332 $45,086 $21,244 $32,325 Overhead $-251 $60 $-161 $627 $216 Total $291,549 $69,175 $94,333 $87,564 $104,542 Travel/ Staff Labor Technical advisors Overhead Training Salary, vacation and Travel, Technical advisors Include : Affiliate inter-utility billing. sick, payroll taxes conference supporting study Exclude : Other overhead expenses such as incentive Exclude : Pension and registrations, development or review, compensation, pension and benefits, worker’s comp, personal benefits (paid outside training costs, PCG2 participation, and liability and property damage insurance, third-party general & EE budget). membership. RTRs. administrative and fixed cost loaders are paid outside of EE budget through the GRC. 1 Annual costs can swing due to accruals and reversals. Quarterly expense for advisors can swing due to time of invoice is billed and paid. 2

  2. SCE Non-Study Costs For EM&V Activities SCE 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 $197,578 $199.904 $204,607 $189,375 $169,367 Staff Labor $153,495 $55,124 $55,773 $57,085 $52,835 $47,253 $42,825 EM&V Admin Travel/Training $4,270 $2,824 $0 $2,251 $115 $4,763 Technical advisors $594 $0 $512 $0 $0 $0 Overhead $9,846 $5,493 $1,528 $1,636 $3,564 $2,384 $168,205 $205,895 $201,844 $208,494 $193,054 $176,514 Total Travel/ Staff Labor Technical advisors Overhead Training Salary, vacation and sick Includes: IT costs (software, web/phone, remote access, Travel, time. As needed technical teleconference). Office supplies, office equipment (computers, conference advisors supporting PCG2 Excludes : phones). registrations, participation, and RTRs Pension/Benefits (paid training costs outside EE budget)

  3. Project Status* Update from 2013 – March 8, 2018 100 90 90 80 70 60 50 40 40 30 12 20 10 9 6 10 2 0 0 * https://psr.energydataweb.com 4

  4. IOU Recently Completed Studies 1. Exterior Lighting Standard Practice Baseline and Work Paper Support Study (TRC) This statewide study focused on nonresidential exterior lighting Fixtures and Retrofit Kits. The purpose was to identify standard practice – defined as exterior lighting sales for new construction and retrofits (but excluding maintenance) in California, to support work paper updates. This study found that LEDs dominate standard practice for exterior fixtures. LEDs comprise 94% of current exterior fixture sales for new construction and retrofits and will grow to 98% by 2020 and 99% by 2023. CALMAC ID: SCE0426.01 2. ZNE Verification Methodologies Phase 2 (TRC) This statewide study developed methodologies for verifying predicted or measured energy performance of ZNE buildings in California. This report represents the Phase 2 deliverable of this effort, which builds on the work of Phase 1 (CALMAC ID PGE.0387.01). The study team proposed four verification levels for projects that attempt ZNE. The levels, in order from lowest to highest ZNE verification, are Ultra-Efficient, ZNE Design, ZNE Performance Monitored, and ZNE Performance Verified. CALMAC ID: PGE0387.02 3. Targeted Home Energy Report Strategy (Nexant) This study investigated approaches for more effective customer targeting and delivery of PG&E’s Home Energy Reports (HER) Program. In this report, two new machine learning algorithms were used to identify which customers are more likely to respond strongly to the HER stimulus based on observed customers responses to HERs obtained in a very large scale randomized controlled trial. This study found that 58% of the customers are predicted to produce less than the average of 0.22 kWh per day. Only 2% of customers are predicted to have negative savings. The study also found that 70% of treated customers are not providing great enough energy savings to justify the cost of delivering their reports. CALMAC ID: PGE0425.01 5

  5. IOU Recently Completed Studies 4. PG&E Home Energy Report (HER) Energy Savings Distribution Analysis & Trends Study (Opinion Dynamics) The purpose of this study was to support the redesign of the PG&E HER Program to increase cost- effectiveness and maximize program savings. This study found that, in 2016, less than one quarter of participants saved energy, while nearly one quarter of participants increased their consumption. This study found trends in customer attrition from this program, which includes the attrition rates being the highest for very positive and negative savings groups, higher attrition rates when the wave begins and decreases over time due to declining size, and the attrition mainly driven by participants moving in and out of PG&E’s service territory. CALMAC ID: PGE0426.01 6

  6. Upcoming IOU Draft Reports Work Order – Project Title Sector Lead IOU EM&V Contact 2048 – Determine Average CA Advanced Homes Res New Program (CAHP) Energy Savings Construction PG&E Josh Harmon 2161 – California Non-Residential LED Quality and Market Characterization Study Lighting PG&E Doreen Caruth 2141 – PG&E Advanced Lighting Controls System (ALCS) Tool Trial Evaluation Lighting PG&E Doreen Caruth 2184 – Commercial Whole Building Demonstration: Early M&V and Process Evaluation Commercial PG&E Brian Smith 2176 – 2017 Home Energy Report Analysis and Support Residential PG&E Brian Smith 2170 – Codes & Standards Program Advocacy Codes & and Attribution Study Standards SCE Emrah Ozkaya 7

Recommend


More recommend