simulations of abelian lattice gauge theories with
play

Simulations of Abelian lattice gauge theories with optical lattices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Simulations of Abelian lattice gauge theories with optical lattices Luca Tagliacozzo Alessio Celi ICFO Maciej Lewenstein Maciej Lewenstein ICFO ICFO Alejandro Zamora ICFO Outlook Why simulations with optical lattices Why lattice


  1. Simulations of Abelian lattice gauge theories with optical lattices Luca Tagliacozzo Alessio Celi ICFO Maciej Lewenstein Maciej Lewenstein ICFO ICFO Alejandro Zamora ICFO

  2. Outlook ● Why simulations with optical lattices ● Why lattice gauge theories ● Describe the specific work on Abelian LGT

  3. Many body quantum systems

  4. Many body quantum systems

  5. Many body quantum systems H = H 1 ­ H 2 ¢ ¢ ¢ H N

  6. Many body quantum systems H = H 1 ­ H 2 ¢ ¢ ¢ H N j à i = c i 1 ¢¢¢ i N j i 1 i ­ ¢¢ ¢j i N i

  7. Many body quantum systems H = H 1 ­ H 2 ¢ ¢ ¢ H N j à i = c i 1 ¢¢¢ i N j i 1 i ­ ¢¢ ¢j i N i d N

  8. Many body quantum systems H = H 1 ­ H 2 ¢ ¢ ¢ H N j à i = c i 1 ¢¢¢ i N j i 1 i ­ ¢¢ ¢j i N i d N

  9. What would we like to know ● “More is different” ● Equilibrium, phases: strong interaction produces macroscopic phases very different from constituents (confinement, fractionalization, topological order) . ● Short time out of Equilibrium dynamic? ● Equilibration

  10. Classical simulations

  11. Classical simulations ● Density functional theory (small interaction) ● Monte Carlo (positive Hamiltonians) ● Tensor Networks (generic)

  12. Controversial results

  13. Time evolution

  14. Time evolution EXPONENTIALLY HARD PROBLEM

  15. Quantum simulators

  16. Quantum simulators COLD ATOMS

  17. Quantum simulators COLD ATOMS IONS TRAPS

  18. Quantum simulators COLD ATOMS IONS TRAPS MICROWAVE ION CHIPS

  19. Quantum simulators IS it the way To dynamic? COLD ATOMS IONS TRAPS MICROWAVE ION CHIPS

  20. Gauge theories ● Specific class of QMBS ● They are very important ingredients for the description of both high and low energies physics (QCD... antiferromagnets...) ● They typically involve more than 2 bodies interactions ● Their strongly coupled regime is still under debate

  21. Natural interactions on optical lattices

  22. Natural interactions on optical lattices

  23. Natural interactions on optical lattices Difficult to engineer interactions different from

  24. Natural interactions on optical lattices Difficult to engineer interactions different from

  25. Natural interactions on optical lattices Difficult to engineer interactions different from

  26. Natural interactions on optical lattices Difficult to engineer interactions different from How do we get four body interactions ?

  27. Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate

  28. Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate

  29. Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate

  30. Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate

  31. Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate

  32. Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate We need a two dimensional Hilbert space

  33. Lattice gauge theories y t x

  34. Lattice gauge theories y t x

  35. Lattice gauge theories y t x

  36. Lattice gauge theories y t x

  37. Lattice gauge theories y t x

  38. Lattice gauge theories y t x

  39. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  40. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  41. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  42. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  43. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  44. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  45. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  46. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  47. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space

  48. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators

  49. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators

  50. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators

  51. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators

  52. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators

  53. Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators

  54. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  55. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  56. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  57. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  58. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  59. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  60. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  61. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  62. The deformed toric code in parallel field

  63. Pure Z2 lattice gauge theory as low energy of the deformed toric code

  64. Pure Z2 lattice gauge theory as low energy of the deformed toric code

  65. Pure Z2 lattice gauge theory as low energy of the deformed toric code

  66. Pure Z2 lattice gauge theory as low energy of the deformed toric code

  67. Pure Z2 lattice gauge theory as low energy of the deformed toric code Wegner 71, Kogut 79 Deconfined/ Confined T opological

  68. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  69. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  70. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  71. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  72. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  73. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  74. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  75. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  76. U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2

  77. Link models and gauge magnets

  78. Link models and gauge magnets

  79. Link models and gauge magnets

  80. Link models and gauge magnets

  81. The U(1) gauge magnets

  82. The U(1) gauge magnets

  83. The U(1) gauge magnets

  84. The U(1) gauge magnets

  85. The U(1) gauge magnets Local Gaped Confined

  86. The U(1) gauge magnets Local Gaped Confined

  87. The U(1) gauge magnets T opological Local Gapless Gaped Confined Confined

  88. Can we really simulate it with Rydberg?

  89. Can we really simulate it with Rydberg? We can perform time evolution two level system which dynamic can be implemented via Rydberg

  90. Can we really simulate it with Rydberg? We can perform time evolution two level system which dynamic can be implemented via Rydberg We cannot make dissipative state preparation Hamiltonian is not frustration free We do not know GS locally

  91. Can we really simulate it with Rydberg? We can perform time evolution two level system which dynamic can be implemented via Rydberg We cannot make dissipative state preparation Hamiltonian is not frustration free We do not know GS locally We cannot make adiabatic preparation Gapless interesting phase no easy state Level crossing with other phase where easy state

Recommend


More recommend