simulation of poroelastic wave propagation using clawpack
play

Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK Grady - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK Grady Lemoine, University of Washington June 28, 2012 Joint work with Randall LeVeque (University of Washington) and M.-J. Yvonne Ou (University of Delaware) Supported in part by grants


  1. Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK Grady Lemoine, University of Washington June 28, 2012 Joint work with Randall LeVeque (University of Washington) and M.-J. Yvonne Ou (University of Delaware) Supported in part by grants from the NIH and NSF Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  2. Outline 1 Poroelasticity Poroelasticity basics Useful structure Solution code 2 Results 3 Qualitative checks Convergence studies Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  3. Outline 1 Poroelasticity Poroelasticity basics Useful structure Solution code 2 Results 3 Qualitative checks Convergence studies Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  4. Poroelasticity theory • Poroelasticity: study of mechanics of fluid-filled porous solids • Originally developed by Maurice Biot in 1930s-1960s for soil and rock Pumice stone. • Major early interest from oil industry • Recent interest for monitoring underground fluid injection (e.g. carbon sequestration) • Recently applied to bone as well • Understanding wave propagation in bone is original motivator for this work Transverse section of cortical bone. Images courtesy Wikimedia Commons. Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  5. Equations of poroelasticity Glossing over a lot of details, can model poroelasticity as a first-order linear system of PDEs: ∂ t Q + A ∂ x Q + B ∂ z Q = DQ, � T � Q = p σ xx σ zz σ xz v x v z q x q z • p is fluid pressure; σ is solid stress tensor; v is solid velocity; q is fluid flow rate • These are in principal coordinates of orthotropic ( not isotropic) material. • Left side is classic hyperbolic system • Right side introduces dissipation, through viscous drag as fluid flows through pores Show system matrices Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  6. Poroelastic waves Poroelasticity equations look like elastodynamics + acoustics. Three families of propagating waves: 1 Fast P-waves , where fluid and solid move (roughly) parallel to propagation direction and in phase 2 S-waves , where fluid and solid move transverse to propagation direction 3 Slow P-waves , where fluid and solid move (roughly) parallel to propation direction but 180 degrees out of phase Slow P-waves involve large motions of fluid relative to solid – heavily damped by viscosity System also supports non-wave-like “diffusive slow mode” where fluid seeps through pores due to pressure gradient Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  7. Wave structure of viscous orthotropic poroelasticity Source term DQ causes dissipation and dispersion Anisotropy also causes wave speeds to differ depending on propagation direction Plots below: phase velocity vs. frequency and direction for orthotropic layered sandstone Phase velocity (m/s) versus direction, all wave families Phase velocity and decay rate for waves in the X direction (no dissipation) 7000 90° 6000 Phase velocity (m/s) 5000 Dashed lines are speeds without dissipation 135° 45° 4000 3000 2000 7000 1000 6000 5000 0 4000 1 2 3 4 5 10 10 10 10 10 3000 2000 2 1000 10 180° 0° 1 10 0 10 Decay rate (1/m) -1 10 -2 10 -3 10 -4 10 -5 10 Fast P-wave -6 10 S-wave -7 225° 315° 10 -8 10 Slow P-wave 1 2 3 4 5 10 10 10 10 10 Frequency (Hz) 270° Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  8. Energy density • Poroelasticity system has some useful properties • Several are associated with the energy density E , which is a quadratic form, E = 1 2 Q T EQ • Hessian E is a symmetric positive-definite matrix • E symmetrizes the system: EA , EB , and ED are symmetric • Easy proof poroelasticity system is hyperbolic • Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of ˘ A = n x A + n z B satisfy symmetric-definite generalized eigenproblem E ˘ Av = λEv • ⇒ Have all real eigenvalues, full set of independent ( E -orthogonal) eigenvectors, therefore hyperbolic Show energy matrix Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  9. Block structure of poroelasticity system Aside: poroelasticity system has stress-velocity block structure • Have grouped stress and velocity variables in state vector to emphasize this: � Q s � � T = � Q = p σ xx σ zz σ xz v x v z q x q z Q v • A , B matrices — stress gradients produce velocity changes, velocity gradients produce stress changes: � 0 � 0 � � A sv B sv A = , B = 0 0 A vs B vs • Energy divides neatly into kinetic and potential: � E s � 0 E = 0 E v This will be useful later Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  10. Stiffness of relaxation term ∂ t Q + A ∂ x Q + B ∂ z Q = DQ • Source term DQ has its own intrinsic time scales • May be stiff depending on problem solved • Can expect difficulties with solution, need to check for possibility of incorrect wave speeds • Source term is of relaxation type, so expect solution to be close to reduced system , ∂ t u + A r ∂ x u + B r ∂ z Q = 0 obtained by restricting to null space N ( D ) • A r = Π AG , where G maps reduced variables to full variables and Π maps full to reduced • Conjecture (Pember 1993): Need reduced system to satisfy subcharacteristic condition – wave speeds not faster than full system Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  11. Entropy function and subcharacteristic condition 2 Q T EQ turns out to be a strictly convex entropy function in E = 1 the sense of Chen, Levermore, and Liu (1994). 1 EA and EB are symmetric 2 ED is symmetric negative-semidefinite 3 The following are equivalent: • Q ∈ N ( D ) • Q T EDQ = 0 • EQ = Π T v for some v 4 E is positive-definite Chen, Levermore, and Liu show this implies a nonstrict subcharacteristic condition, λ min ( A ) ≤ λ min ( A r ) , λ max ( A r ) ≤ λ max ( A ) • Can expect to avoid spurious solutions • Accuracy may still be affected Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  12. Outline 1 Poroelasticity Poroelasticity basics Useful structure Solution code 2 Results 3 Qualitative checks Convergence studies Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  13. CLAWPACK Solved poroelasticity equations using CLAWPACK • CLAWPACK: Conservation LAWs PACKage • Can really handle any hyperbolic system, not just conservation laws • High-resolution finite volume package for wave propagation • Low memory overhead, parallel (multicore, PETSc) • Supports logically rectangular mapped grids • Source terms handled by operator splitting • Adaptive mesh refinement available too (Berger-Colella-Oliger approach, AMRCLAW) • Handles code that is common across all high-resolution FVM solvers • User only needs to write routines for Riemann solve, source terms Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  14. Riemann solver Writing an efficient Riemann solver for this system looks hard: • 8 × 8 system with 3 wave families – lots of computation per solve • For applications, want to handle material heterogeneity • Also want to handle mapped grids, arbitrary interface direction • Can’t use geometric symmetry – anisotropic material! However, can take advantage of block structure, energy matrix to simplify Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  15. Riemann solver • Waves and speeds come from eigenproblem ˘ Ar = λr , where ˘ A = n x A + n z B • E is nonsingular, so multiply by E to get E ˘ Ar = λEr • From block structure of E and ˘ A , get E s ˘ E v ˘ A sv r v = λE s r s , A vs r s = λE v r v A sv ) T . Rewrite • Since E ˘ A is symmetric, E v ˘ A vs = ( E s ˘ second equation as ˘ A T sv E s r s = λE v r v • Multiply first equation by ˘ A T sv from left: ˘ sv E s ˘ A sv r v = λ ˘ A T A T sv E s r s = λ 2 E v r v • Reduced 8 × 8 problem to 4 × 4 symmetric definite problem Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

  16. Riemann solver • Can reduce to symmetric ordinary eigenproblem by factorizing E v to LL T : L − 1 ˘ A sv L − T w ≡ M 4 w = λ 2 w, w = L T r v sv E s ˘ A T • M 4 matrix is complicated but can break down in terms of n x and n z : sv E s A sv L − T n 2 M 4 = L − 1 A T x sv E s B sv L − T + L − 1 B T sv E s A sv L − T ) n x n z + ( L − 1 A T sv E s B sv L − T n 2 + L − 1 B T z ≡ M 4 xx n 2 x + M 4 xz n x n z + M 4 zz n 2 z • Can precompute M 4 ∗∗ matrices, only form linear combination at each solve • Also know null space of ˘ A sv , can reduce dimension with variable substitution • In the end, get 3 × 3 symmetric eigenproblem Grady Lemoine, University of Washington Simulation of Poroelastic Wave Propagation Using CLAWPACK

Recommend


More recommend