sidc xbid update 18 th mesc meeting entso e brussels 17
play

SIDC (XBID) Update 18 th MESC Meeting ENTSO-E, Brussels 17.09.2019 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIDC (XBID) Update 18 th MESC Meeting ENTSO-E, Brussels 17.09.2019 SIDC Headlines on Progress 2 nd Wave Go-Live on target for November but risk Deployment of Release 2.0 on target for end October remains User The Acceptance


  1. SIDC (XBID) Update 18 th MESC Meeting ENTSO-E, Brussels 17.09.2019

  2. SIDC – Headlines on Progress 2 nd Wave Go-Live on target for November but risk Deployment of Release 2.0 on target for end October remains • User • The Acceptance Testing, UAT, has been final phase of Local Implementation successful and delivered to plan. Final phase Project testing is underway • Pre-launch Event is scheduled for 1 st October. is now underway (Performance Testing) • Release 2.0 delivers increased Order Book Invitations issued/participants are registered • Risks on 2 nd Wave include Transit Shipping Depth of 100 (up from 31) • Also delivers Enhanced Shipper for 2 nd Wave (see separate slides), MPLS connections and XBID Go-Live technical readiness successfully transitioned to Future Development progresses Roadmap SIDC • The Proof of Concept for Losses on DC Cables • Roadmap developed with circa 130 items is underway (expected to complete in covering geographic extension, usability and November) functional development • Pilot of Agile Development agreed with DBAG • Research & Development workshop with NRAs scheduled for 26 th September and approach is being discussed • Scope of Release 3.0 ongoing – list to be • Early discussions on Intraday Auctions and aligned with 2020 Budget - discussions ongoing. governance 2

  3. SIDC key figures – performance monitoring – example Order Transactions / Trades 1,000,000 100,000 900,000 90,000 800,000 80,000 Orders Transactions 700,000 70,000 Realistic Test Scenario 600,000 <=50k 60,000 Trades 500,000 50,000 400,000 40,000 Realistic Test Scenario 300,000 30,000 3A<=400k 200,000 20,000 100,000 10,000 0 0 2018-06-12 2018-06-18 2018-06-24 2018-07-01 2018-07-07 2018-07-13 2018-07-19 2018-07-25 2018-07-31 2018-08-06 2018-08-12 2018-08-18 2018-08-24 2018-08-30 2018-09-05 2018-09-11 2018-09-17 2018-09-23 2018-09-29 2018-10-05 2018-10-11 2018-10-17 2018-10-23 2018-10-29 2018-11-04 2018-11-10 2018-11-16 2018-11-22 2018-11-28 2018-12-04 2018-12-10 2018-12-16 2018-12-22 2018-12-28 2019-01-03 2019-01-09 2019-01-15 2019-01-21 2019-01-27 2019-02-02 2019-02-08 2019-02-14 2019-02-20 2019-02-26 2019-03-04 2019-03-10 2019-03-16 2019-03-22 2019-03-28 2019-04-03 2019-04-09 2019-04-15 2019-04-21 2019-04-27 2019-05-03 2019-05-09 2019-05-15 2019-05-21 2019-05-27 2019-06-02 2019-06-08 2019-06-14 2019-06-20 2019-06-26 The figure shows daily Orders Transactions (Order events) and Trades since the first complete day of trading (13 June 2018). The maximum order transactions peak (~862k) was produced on 26 June 2019 . The trades also reached a peak in that month (~85k on 7 June). Over 20 million trades have been completed since the 1 st go-live Note: Realistic Test Scenarios have been run and SLAs agreed to ensure effective contractual frameworks as the Intraday Market grows 3

  4. 2 nd Wave Go-Live – “Transit” Shipping (1/2) • The 2 nd Wave Go-Live is scheduled for November 2019 with 7 countries – Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania & Slovenia (subject to successful testing) in two Local Implementation Projects (LIPs). See Appendix for parties involved. • In comparison to the 1st Wave, the 2nd Wave shipping arrangements introduce a more complex topology for SIDC which could not be fully considered when the Shipping Module was initially developed for the 1 st Wave Go-Live. • In order to deal with this 2nd wave complexity - a role of the preferred shipper has been established. This means that in the MNAs (Multi NEMO Arrangements) areas, “preferred” shipping agent from amongst the two NEMO/CCP/Shipping agents currently active* in these MNA areas needs to be appointed by each NEMO/CCP. • The preferred shipper role deals with “transit shipping activities“ (shipping of the energy through delivery areas where the trade has neither source nor sink). Transit in non-MNA areas does not need any selection as the non-MNA NEMO/CCP active in each area assures this activity (or nominates another entity to provide it, e.g. shipping agents) to all other NEMOs/CCPs. • The arrangements and agreement regarding “Transit” Shipping through MNA areas is key for the success of the 2 nd Wave *At the current time EPEX SPOT/ECC and EMCO/NordPool could be active NEMOs in all MNA areas and TGE is only active in the Polish MNA area. EXAA is not operational in XBID. 4

  5. 2 nd Wave Go-Live – “Transit” Shipping (2/2 ) • A selection process for the provision of “Transit” Shipping in MNA areas has been jointly prepared (to ensure consistency) by the non-MNA NEMOs • The corresponding Request for Offer (RfO) was sent to EMCO and EPEX/ECC on 14th August, together with the defined Terms. • Responses were received by 11th September and the final selection decision is due to be made on 18th September. This will be followed by final negotiations, a Lock-In if needed, NRA approvals (where needed) and incorporation in bilateral agreements. • The timeline is challenging in order to secure the 2nd wave go-live scheduled for 19th November 2019. • If timely agreement is not reached through this process, then a Transit Shipper will be appointed for an interim period of up to 6 months. The above RfO included the request for the potential providers to detail the costs for 3 and 6 months under direct assignment of the Transit Shipper role. This is designed to mitigate the risk on the 2nd wave go-live if the above selection process does not deliver in time. • TGE, the Polish NEMO, is separately running a selection process for the selection of their Preferred Shipper and also requested a response from EMCO and ECC by 11th September. • Transit Shipping is being monitored very closely by the Transit Shipping Group and the SIDC Intraday Steering Committee. • Other risks to the 2 nd wave go-live include the Nomination system in Poland, some NEMOs’ connection to the MPLS (communication channel) for back office activities, and completion of testing. 5

  6. Appendix: 2 nd wave Local Implementation Projects and parties involved LIP Participants Foreseen allocation • AT-CZ, AT-SI, NEMOs : BSP, Cropex, Implicit • AT-HU, BG- EPEX, HUPX, IBEX, Nord Implicit & RO, CZ-DE, Pool, OPCOM, OTE Explicit for 15 16 CZ-PL, DE-PL, TSOs : 50Hertz, APG, HR-SI border HR-SI, HR-HU, CEPS, ELES, ESO, HOPS, HU-RO MAVIR, PSE, Transelectrica, TTG LT-PL, PL-SE NEMOs : Nord Pool, TGE Implicit 16 TSOs : Litgrid, PSE, Svk 15 Operational Operational, part of 2nd wave 2nd wave 6

Recommend


More recommend