sherman sherman denison sherman sherman denison denison
play

Sherman Sherman-Denison Sherman Sherman-Denison Denison Denison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sherman Sherman-Denison Sherman Sherman-Denison Denison Denison Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) Sherman-Denison BPP Sherman Denison BPP Both Sherman and Denison have established, more , traditional


  1. Sherman Sherman-Denison Sherman Sherman-Denison Denison Denison Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP)

  2. Sherman-Denison BPP Sherman Denison BPP � Both Sherman and Denison have established, more , traditional neighborhoods, as well as newly developed communities within and around the fringes of the city limits of the city limits. � Both cities have many local destinations that, if connected, could be easily accessed by clearly identifiable and separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities. � Destinations considered include � Destinations considered include – but are not limited but are not limited to – shopping centers, employment centers, local schools, the college campuses, libraries and parks.

  3. I In the 2040 MTP draft… th 2040 MTP d ft � P.1.2. The 2040 Plan will identify policies that improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians within the walking shed of elementary and middle schools the walking-shed of elementary and middle schools. � P.1.3. Transportation improvements will be � P.1.3. Transportation improvements will be considered that increase safety for vulnerable users such as pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled travelers, and children and children.

  4. Aims of the 2014 BPP study Aims of the 2014 BPP study � Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, � Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, � Ensure equitable inclusion and outcomes, � Streamline mobility and access methodologies � Streamline mobility and access methodologies, � Commitment to quality of life, health, well-being, � Advocate mobility partnerships that add value � Advocate mobility partnerships that add value, � P rotect and enhance e nvironmental resources, � Advance cities' and region's economic � Advance cities' and region's economic sustainability.

  5. Current conditions Current conditions

  6. Current conditions Current conditions

  7. Current conditions Current conditions

  8. C C Current conditions Current conditions t t diti diti

  9. Current conditions Current conditions

  10. FINDINGS / RECOMMENDATIONS Denison BPP Sherman-Denison BPP Sherman

  11. Safe school access: Team identified gaps in the existing gaps in the existing sidewalk system around elementary and secondary and secondary schools within each attendance area.

  12. Sidewalk Gaps (Note: (Note: TAP SRTS TAP SRTS- -type type projects can projects can j j t t extend up to 2 extend up to 2 miles) miles)

  13. Mays E.S. after school cue Mays E.S. after school cue

  14. Rural Rail Transportation Districts Rural Rail Transportation Districts NC RRTD created in 1995 is inactive NC RRTD created in 1995 is inactive Inactive RR's could be potential trails. Inactive RR's could be potential trails.

  15. NC RRTD NC NC NC RRTD created in 1995 is RRTD created in 1995 is inactive. RRTD t d i t d i 1995 i 1995 i i i inactive. ti ti Inactive RR's could be potential trails. Inactive RR's could be potential trails.

  16. Class III Bikeways – Bike Routes and Wayfinding y g Total 43 9 miles Total 43.9 miles Cost ranges: g $439,000-$636,600 (both cities)

  17. R Recommendations Summary: (draft) d ti S (d ft) Class III Bikeways - Bike Routes, Wayfinding location distance range of potential costs � Denison 29.1 mi. $ 291,000-422,400 $ , , � Sherman 14.8 mi. $ 147,700-214,300

  18. Class II Bikeways – Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes, Cycle Tracks

  19. Recommendations Summary: (draft) Class II Bikeways – Class II Bikeways Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes, or Cycle Tracks location distance range of potential costs � Denison 8.0 mi. D i 8 0 i $ 160 000 200 000 $ 160,000-200,000 � Sherman 20.4 mi. $ 408,000-510,000

  20. Class I Bikeways – Off-Street Sh Shared Use Paths d U P th

  21. Recommendations Summary: (draft) Class I Bikeways – y Off-Street Shared Use Paths location distance range of potential costs � Denison 8.4 mi. $ 2,520,000-3,780,000 � Sherman 15.2 mi. $ 4,560,000-6,840,000

  22. How to fund?

  23. Proposed Candidate Scoring Criteria for Access to: Proposed Candidate Scoring Criteria for Access to: NOTE: Weightings can be subject to local priorities NOTE: Weightings can be subject to local priorities. Schools (any level) 5 � Parks, tourist destinations 4 � Large employer 5 � Transit 3 � Multi-family mixed-use dense Multi family, mixed use, dense 5 5 � � Shopping 3 � Includes Bike Parking/or it exists 5 � Supported by City S t d b Cit 10 10 � Environmental Justice Area 10 � Right of way availability 15 � In current CIP 15 � Serves both Bike and Ped 10 � Meets regional criteria Meets regional criteria 10 10 � � Total Maximum Points 100 �

  24. Aims of the 2014 BPP study Aims of the 2014 BPP study � Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, � Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, � Ensure equitable inclusion and outcomes, � Streamline mobility and access methodologies � Streamline mobility and access methodologies, � Commitment to quality of life, health, well-being, � Advocate accretive mobility partnerships � Advocate accretive mobility partnerships, � P rotect and enhance e nvironmental resources, � Advance cities' and region's economic � Advance cities' and region's economic sustainability.

  25. Thank you! Thank you! Q&A Q&A

  26. Class II Bikeways – Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes, or Cycle Tracks , , y

  27. Class I Bikeways – Off Street Shared Use Paths Off-Street Shared Use Paths

  28. Class III Bikeways – Denison Bike Routes and Wayfinding Location Miles Estimate of Potential Cost / Range Ray-Bond 2.1 $21,000-$30,500 Washington 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 Morton-Lillis Morton-Lillis 2 1 2.1 $21 000-$30 500 $21,000-$30,500 Crawford 1.4 $14,000-$20,300 Park 1.4 $14,000-$20,300 Stafford-Loy Lake 1.3 $13,000-$18,900 Waterloo Lake Waterloo Lake 0 6 0.6 $6 000 $8 700 $6,000-$8,700 Loy Lake-Bullock-Brock 2.0 $20,000-$29,000 Maurice 1.0 $10,000-$14,500 Scullin 0.9 $9,000-$13,100 Chandler Chandler 1 8 1.8 $18 000 $26 100 $18,000-$26,100 Burnett 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 Crockett 0.9 $9,000-$13,100 Johnson 1.9 $19,000-$27,600 Sears Sears 1 6 1.6 $16 000 $23 200 $16,000-$23,200 Woodard-Houston 1.4 $14,000-$20,300 Gandy-Fairbanks 0.4 $4,000-$5,800 Verna-Day-Munson 2.6 $26,000-$37,700 Heron Heron 1.1 1 1 $11 000 $16 000 $11,000-$16,000 Coffin 1.2 $12,000-$17,400 Totals 26.9 $438,700-636,100

  29. Class III Bikeways – Sherman Bike Routes and Wayfinding Location Miles Estimate of Potential Cost / Range Teresa-Texoma-Frisco 5.8 $58,000-$84,100 Main 0.7 $7,000-$10,200 $ $ Lamberth 2.9 $29,000-$42,100 Ricketts Ricketts 1.8 1.8 $18,000-$26,100 $18,000 $26,100 Burton-Wood 0.3 $3,000-$4,400 Rex Cruse 0.2 $2,000-$2,900 Washington 1.8 $18,000-$26,100 Brockett 1.1 $11,000-$16,000 Pecan P 0.2 0 2 $2 000 $2 900 $2,000-$2,900 King-Crockett 1.6 $16,000-$23,200 Thomas 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 $ , $ , 13.9 ??

  30. Bicycle Road Safety Audit Guidelines Bicycle Road Safety Audit Guidelines and Prompt Lists and Prompt Lists d P d P t Li t t Li t http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/fhwasa12018/fhwasa12018.pdf

  31. Identified Identified sidewalk sidewalk gaps gaps gaps gaps

Recommend


More recommend