SES 2018 Analysis: Summer Enrichment Series (SES), 2018 The world is changing. Meet the future.
SES 2017 Expenses: $537,401 SES 2018 Expenses: $543,047 $26,423, 5% $50,000, 9% $7,350, 1% $6,600,1% $24,486, 4% $25,552, 5% $26,423, 5% $22,721, 4% $455,818 85% $445,175, 81% Salaries & Benefits Other Purch Svcs Supplies/Printing Salaries & Benefits Other Purch Svcs Supplies/Printing Custodial Transportation Custodial Transportation …after adjustments are affixed to increases in salary and benefits, we may be looking at a total SES 2018 cost upward to $600,000, an 11 percent change as compared to the prior year. SES Summary of Expenses, 2017 vs. 2018 The world is changing. Meet the future.
SES Student Body of D11 Eligible Student Body 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 16948 16446 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 2316, 14% 1978, 12% 0% SES 2017 SES 2018 …14% of the eligible D11 student body (grades K -7) attended in 2017, 12% in 2018. Percent of SES Students from the Eligible Student Body, 2017 vs. 2018 The world is changing. Meet the future.
SES 2017 Attendance SES 2018 Attendance 100% 100% 90% 90% 80.6% 78.7% 79.7% 75.0% 71.1% 80% 80% 69.2% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 …highest weekly attendance in 2017 and 2018 was 80% and 81%, respectively. SES Attendance, 2017 vs. 2018 The world is changing. Meet the future.
SES Class Size, Week Three SES Class Size, Week One SES Class Size, Week Two Low (3-9) 21% Hi (19-25) 24% Low (3-9) 28% Low (3-9) 29% Hi (19-25) 33% Hi (19-25) 32% Med (10-18) 46% Med (10-18) 40% Med (10-18) 47% Low (3-9) Med (10-18) Hi (19-25) Low (3-9) Med (10-18) Hi (19-25) Low (3-9) Med (10-18) Hi (19-25) …42% of the classes in week one were less than 50% full, 43% in week two, and 48% in week three. SES Classroom Fill Rates, 2018 The world is changing. Meet the future.
Follow-on Critical Analysis, SES 2018 The purpose of this analysis builds on the existing literature by conducting a follow-on critical investigation of related key program components. Framework for Assessing SES 1) Intent of the program 2) Effect of participating in SES on school year attendance 3) Effect of participating in SES on school year discipline incidents 4) SES expense to the district 5) SES enrollment 6) Equality 7) Equity 8) SES operations 9) Student retention 10) Effect of SES on CMAS 11) Effect of SES on Fall GK12 (the most recent only) The world is changing. Meet the future.
Descriptive Statistics: Empirical Effect of SES on Components: SES Student Non Statistical Criterion Group to D11 Non-SES Attending Student Group Component Not Met Met SES Student Group Non-SES Student Group Intent of Program Yes Attendance Low None None Cost to the District Increasing Discipline No effect None None Enrollment Declining Equality Access Not Addressed Equity and/or Implemented Operations Recurring Issues D11 Retention Disenrollments Yes (ELA, Math; effect size State Assessment No effect None non-existent) Local Assessment No effect None Yes (ELA, Math) SES Framework for Assessing the Program Across the Years The world is changing. Meet the future.
Follow-on Critical Analysis, SES 2018 The purpose of this analysis builds on the existing literature by conducting a follow-on critical investigation of related key program components. Q&A The world is changing. Meet the future.
APPENDICES/NOTES
SES 2018 (hi-lo, three week total) STEAM Classes SES 2018 Classes Taken by SES 2018 Students (3 Wks) Teachers Offered Range of Students Per Class (min-max) Enrolled in D11 at Start Disenrolled from D11 Week Week Week Week Week Week Total 1 of SES 2018 Prior to SES 2018 1 2 3 1 2 3 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 School Sector Audubon ES Middle 540 12 311 10 10 9 10 10 9 11-25 11-25 11-25 Martinez ES* Northern 579 6 310 9 11 10 9 11 10 4-25 6-25 13-25 Chipeta ES Northern 422 7 227 10 9 10 10 9 10 5-25 6-25 6-24 Keller ES Middle 449 2 220 12 12 13 12 12 13 4-25 6-22 5-18 Jenkins MS Northern 435 0 212 8 7 6 8 7 6 10-25 8-25 13-25 Taylor ES Middle 333 4 192 7 7 7 7 7 7 10-24 9-25 6-24 Carver ES Middle 364 2 185 9 9 10 9 9 10 5-25 4-25 7-21 Holmes MS* Middle 300 2 174 6 8 4 6 8 4 12-25 6-25 11-25 Madison ES Middle 225 7 167 7 8 7 7 8 7 10-25 4-25 5-25 Jackson ES Middle 236 3 117 7 8 6 7 8 6 7-18 5-21 7-19 Sabin MS Middle 216 3 111 7 6 6 7 6 6 7-17 9-17 7-15 Mann MS Middle 203 1 104 7 6 5 7 6 5 5-18 8-17 6-21 West ES Southern 182 0 103 7 7 5 7 7 5 5-17 5-14 3-20 1978 2 Total (unique count) 1937 41 106 108 98 106 108 98 5-25 4-25 3-25 1 Sorted highest to lowest. 2 Of the 1,978 students attending SES, 387 attended one week, 536 attended two weeks, and 1,055 attended all three weeks. *Two students were found to be double-enrolled at different locations. The two records showing no attendance were removed from the dataset. *One student was found to be double-enrolled at the same location. The one record showing no attendance was removed from the dataset. Note: Of the 41 students who were disenrolled from D11 prior to the start of SES, four, or 9.8 percent, returned to D11 as of October 12, 2018. Of the 1,978 students that attended SES, 234, or 11.8 percent, did not return to D11 as of October 12, 2018. SES Student, Teacher, and Classroom Descriptives, 2018 The world is changing. Meet the future.
Analysis: SES 2018 The intent of this analysis is to provide descriptive and summary statistics about SES 2018 with interpretation of the results, discussion and recommendations to improve the program. Findings - Declining SES Enrollment - 13.4 percent, or 234, of the SES active enrollment were not on the D11 rolls as of October 2018. - Persistent operational issues - Declining transportation participation - Ten (10) percent, week one; seven (7) percent, week three. - SES reaching only 12 percent of the D11 eligible student body The world is changing. Meet the future.
Analysis: SES 2018 The intent of this analysis is to provide descriptive and summary statistics about SES 2018 with interpretation of the results, discussion and recommendations to improve the program. Findings - Signs of disparate access to select student groups - Survey participation - Principal/Administration: high - Teachers: high - Parents: Low (2017-30% to 2018-20%) - The intent of the program was achieved (4 th year). The world is changing. Meet the future.
Analysis: SES 2018 The intent of this analysis is to provide descriptive and summary statistics about SES 2018 with interpretation of the results, discussion and recommendations to improve the program. Recommendations - Prioritize Commuting Safety (as reported in surveys, recurring) - Early drop off - Check in/out at SES host sites - Crossing guards - Improve Data Collection: - Transportation ridership (recurring) - Medical incidents The world is changing. Meet the future.
Analysis: SES 2018 The intent of this analysis is to provide descriptive and summary statistics about SES 2018 with interpretation of the results, discussion and recommendations to improve the program. Recommendations - Review SES Program Structure processes, procedures and systems - Classroom enrollment (ranges from three (3) to 25) - Communication (recurring) - Inactive students attending SES - Conduct Program Evaluation The world is changing. Meet the future.
Follow-on Critical Analysis, SES 2018 The purpose of this analysis builds on the existing literature by conducting a follow-on critical investigation of related key program components. Program Intent: Previous analyses (Medina, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018) about the D11 SES program found that the intent of the program reached satisfactory attainment across the years. Attendance: The findings suggest SES had no effect on school year attendance rates and that low attendance rates during SES is persistent. SES Expense to the District: The findings suggest that the cost of operating SES, as currently designed and operated, is inconsistent with demonstrating fiscal prudence and financial responsibility, as well as demonstrating operational efficiencies. The world is changing. Meet the future.
Follow-on Critical Analysis, SES 2018 The purpose of this analysis builds on the existing literature by conducting a follow-on critical investigation of related key program components. Discipline : The findings suggest SES had no effect on school year discipline incidents and any change in preceding school year discipline rates is not evident. Enrollment: The findings suggest SES enrollment is not only lower than it was in SES 2015 but that it shows a downward trend. Equality: The findings suggest that equality across all student groups is not where it should be. Equity: The findings suggest that equity is absent within the SES program. Operations: The findings suggest that the combined influence of these recurring operating issues contributed, to some degree, to the declining SES enrollment, low SES attendance, and D11 student retention. The world is changing. Meet the future.
Recommend
More recommend
