school of mechanical and materials engineering project
play

School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Project Motivation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Effect of Surface Treatment on the Degradation of Composite Adhesives Lloyd Smith and Prashanti Pothakamuri School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Project Motivation Higher efficiencies in commercial aircraft are being


  1. The Effect of Surface Treatment on the Degradation of Composite Adhesives Lloyd Smith and Prashanti Pothakamuri School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering

  2. Project Motivation • Higher efficiencies in commercial aircraft are being realized through composite materials • Bonded joints contribute to the weight savings afforded by advanced materials • The resistance of adhesives to long-term degradation is not understood as well as their adherends • Stress can accelerate degradation and is often not considered in degradation studies

  3. Environmental Exposure Facility • Aggressive environments • Temperature • Stress � Creep or cyclic • Time

  4. Environmental Exposure Facility

  5. Project Goals � Surface treatment effects • Strength • Fracture toughness • Durability � Accelerated test methods • Wedge crack � Model degradation • Geometry • Temperature

  6. Characterization • Mode I fracture toughness � Double cantilever beam • Creep load (s) � Wide area lap shear • Cyclic load (s) (low frequency, < 1 hz) � Wide area lap shear • Accelerated testing � Wedge crack coupons � Compliant adherends • Degradation modeling � Weight change

  7. Materials • Low cost prepreg adherends � 777 or 7e7 • Co-bonded adhesive films � Metal bond 1515-3 or AF555 • Surface treatments � No prep (60001 peel ply) � Grit blast � Plasma etch

  8. Simulated Environmental Exposure • 140F water immersion • Up to 10k hour durations • Post mortem surface characterization to be performed at University of Washington

  9. Fickian and Non-Fickian Weight Change

  10. ⎡ ⎡ ⎡ ⎡ ⎤ ⎤ ⎤ ⎤ t t t t ( ( ( ( ) ) ) ) dC dC dC dC ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ = = = = − − − − − − − − τ τ τ τ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ τ τ τ τ o o o o C C C C ( ( ( ( t t t t , , , , z z z z ) ) ) ) exp exp exp exp k k k k ( ( ( ( t t t t ) ) ) ) d d d d ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ τ τ τ τ ⎣ ⎣ ⎣ ⎣ ⎦ ⎦ ⎦ ⎦ d d d d 0 0 0 0 Modeling Degradation [ ] ∂ ∂ [ ] d C 2 c c − = = ⋅ k C D ∂ ∂ 2 dt t z ⎡ ⎤ t ( ) dC ∫ = − − τ ⋅ ⋅ τ o C ( t , z ) exp k ( t ) d ⎢ ⎥ τ ⎣ ⎦ d 0 h 1 ∫ = ⋅ C ( t ) C ( t , z ) dz h 0

  11. Comparison of predicted and measured moisture concentration Experimental Concentration 0.06 Model Concentration 0.05 Concentration (%) 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 time (sec) 0.5

  12. Proposed First Year Work • Long term durability � Consider current bond preparation practices � 140F water immersion � Residual fracture toughness after sustained environmental exposure (DCB) � Residual strength and modulus after sustained creep and cyclic loading (WLS) • Accelerated testing � Wedge crack coupons � Adherend compliance proportional to fracture toughness � Compare crack growth as a function of bond quality

  13. Proposed First Year Work • Modeling degradation � Expose polymer to aggressive solvent with measurable weight change (gain or loss) � Characterize fundamental degradation parameters ( D, c m , k ) � Consider temperature and geometry effects

Recommend


More recommend