SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RUBRICS OF PRESENTATION II - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RUBRICS OF PRESENTATION II - EAT451/4, SEMESTER II, 2017/2018 PO Cri PO Statement Possible Rubrics Assessment/ Advanced Developing Introductory Poor Section 4 3 2 1 The student has clearly identify the Tender Document content/description according to the correct flow of Instruction to Tender, Contractual and The student has outline General Requirement, Form of Tender, Same as (4), except that the TOC, but not clearly The student has show the Letter of Acceptance, Condition of explanation linking to flow explain the personnel TOC with some errors, and Introduction Contract, Standard Specification Work, of tender document involve in the project, not briefing on the flow of Schedule of Rate, BQ, and List of submission is not clear not clear of tender tender document Drawing. The student excellently brief enough. document submission submission. the scope of works, the officer involve, flow. the correct title of project, Table of Content (TOC), briefly explain the flow of tender document submisson. The student has clearly identify the extensive standard and specification for multi disciplinary team/task requirement at the tendering stage according to the The standard and The standard and corrrect code of Same as (4), except that specification are poorly Standard and specification are practice/manual/guidelines. some information analysed, use wrong Specifications moderately analysed Identify, formulate, Specifications elements are complete, synthesized from the guideline/manual of (for multi and presented data research literature accurate and clearly stated including presented data including calculation and presented disciplinary including and analyse architectural, civil and structural, M&E figure/table/plan lay-out data including team/task) figure/table/plan lay-out complex and ancillary specification works. are missing/not clear. figure/table/plan lay-out are are missing/unclear. engineering Information synthesized from the missing/unclear. presented data including problems figure/table/plan lay-out are concisely reaching included. PO2 PA substantiated conclusions using

conclusions using first principles of The student has clearly formulate the mathematics, extensive Schedule of Rate and the BQ natural sciences Measurement at tendering stage to all and engineering equipment/services/works for The schedule of rate The schedule of rate and sciences. (WK1 to preliminary works, earth works, building Same as (4), except that and BQ Measurement BQ measurement are WK4) works, external works, M&E works, Schedule of Rate some information are moderately poorly analysed, use wrong Provisional items and summary of and Bill of synthesized from the analysed and clauses, wrong of tender are shown. Standard Quantity (BQ) presented data including presented data description, rate and unit Measurement Method (SMM2) is used Measurement figure/table/plan lay-out including also presented data with correct clauses, description, are missing/not clear. figure/table/plan lay-out including figure/table/plan quantity, rate, unit and amount. are missing/unclear. lay-out are missing/unclear. Information synthesized from the presented data including figure/table/plan lay-out are concisely included. The student has clearly identify the extensive list of drawing at tendering The schedule of rate The schedule of rate and stage includes structural elements, Same as (4), except that and BQ Measurement BQ measurement are water reticulation, drainage and some information are moderately poorly analysed, use wrong sewerage system, road, M&E and all Drawings/Plan synthesized from the analysed and clauses, wrong of the typical sections with correct and lay-out presented data including presented data description, rate and unit clear description/label of drawings. figure/table/plan lay-out including also presented data Information synthesized from the are missing/not clear. figure/table/plan lay-out including figure/table/plan presented data including are missing/unclear. lay-out are missing/unclear. figure/table/plan lay-out are concisely included.

The student has clearly demonstrate the Instructions to Tenderers for specific type of project including complete List of Checklist for tender submission, supporting documents with correct form The instructions to name/type, registration of PKK and The instructions to tenderers are poorly CIDB and tenderer clarification letter Same as (4), except that tenderes are analysed, wrong of that apply legal/ethical principle and some information moderately analysed description of project type, Instructions to understanding to professional ethics synthesized from the and presented data ET wrong supporting Tenderers and norms of engineering practice. The presented data including including documents and presented student excellently brief the scope of figure/table/sample of form figure/table/sample of data including works, the officer involve, the correct are missing/not clear. form are figure/table/sample of form Apply ethical title of project, Table of Content, briefly missing/unclear. are missing/unclear. principles and explain the flow of tender document commit to submisson. Information synthesized professional ethics from the presented data including PO8 and responsibilities figure/table/sample of form are and norms of concisely included. engineering practice. (WK7) The student has clearly demonstrate the correct form of tender for correct type of project, correct the Letter of The from of tender, LA The Form of tender, LA and Acceptance, and important condition of and condition of Condition of Contract are Same as (4), except that Form of tender, contract according to type of project contract are moderately poorly shown, wrong of some information Letter of with correct supporting document that analysed and description of project type, synthesized from the Acceptance (LA) apply legal/ethical principle and presented data wrong supporting presented data including and Condition of undertanding to professional ethics and including documents and presented figure/table/sample of plan Contract norms of engineering practice. figure/table/sample of data including are missing/not clear. Information synthesized from the form are figure/table/sample of form presented data including missing/unclear. are missing/unclear. figure/table/sample of form are concisely included. Slide Slide and sentence Presentation slide and structure are mostly Slide and sentence Presentation slide is well-organized sentence structure are organized but some Slides structure are disorganized and engaging. Text displayed in a way organized and engaging parts may be quite organization and in some parts and quite that is totally easy for audience to for most parts. At least difficult to follow. At sentence difficult to follow. May understand with no grammatical 75% of the text displayed least 50% of the text structure contain too much text with in a way that is easy for displayed in a way that errors. grammartical errors. is easy for audience to audience to understand. understand.

Communicate Relevant figures, tables effectively on and plan lay-ouy are complex Figures, tables and plan lay-out chosen, but may not be Shows less relevant engineering Criteria as (5) except selected are relevant and effectively effectively presented, activities with the Suitable aiding figures, tables, and plan lay- some mistakes in using engineering figure, table and presented . Correct usage of standard has quite satisfactory out with lot of mistakes in standard symbols/unit or plan lay-out community and with symbols/unit and excellent figure figure quality and/or using standard figure quality not excellent. society at large, quality. some mistakes in symbols/unit. such as being using standard able to symbols/unit. PO10 CM comprehend and write effective Presentation reports and design documentation, Majority of points make effective proposed are good. presentations, and Points are mostly give and receive organised , but Proposed points are clear instructions. Proposes strong, constructive points Ideas are developed, but developed with satisfactory , but some are which audience can follow 100% of the some points are not well insufficient details . not organised . Insufficient time. Points are well-organised and explained. Audience can Audience can follow Clarity, information/details given. follow 75% of the time. developed with sufficient details. 50% of the time. Organization and Audience has difficulty Dressing criteria as in (4), Formally and neatly dressed, moves Dressed satisfactorily, Style of following the presentation. has clear and strong voice and looks around comfortably, has clear voice can be heard and Presentation Dressed informally but and strong voice projection, shows projection, but shows less understood, delivery is neat, or formally dressed project enthusiasm and project enthusiasm and interest, mostly clear and but less neat, and speaks interest. composed and confident. natural. Keeps either too soft or too fast. nervousness under control, but no enthusiasm or interest shown.

PO2, PO8, P010 PO1, PO6,PO10,PO12