Sangren Hall
Process Process and Schedule Process and Schedule Process and and Schedule Schedule 1. Visioning 2 Programming 2. Programming 3. Conceptual Design 4. Schematic Design 5 Design Development 5. Design Development 6. Construction Documentation 7. Bidding & Negotiation 8. Construction 9. Occupancy
Completed Completed Completed Completed VIS VIS VIS VIS IONI IONING IONI IONING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING DES DES DES DES IGN IGN IGN IGN DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION CONS CONS CONS CONS TRUCTION TRUCTION TRUCTION TRUCTION Establishes Big Picture Establishes Big Picture Critical Success Factors Quality Model Benchmarking Surveys
Finalizing Finalizing Finalizing Finalizing CONS CONS CONS CONS TRUCTION TRUCTION TRUCTION TRUCTION VIS VIS VIS VIS IONI IONING IONI IONING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING DES DES DES DES IGN IGN IGN IGN DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION Defines Space Needs Defines Space Needs Guided by the Vision Understand Existing Utilization Campus Standards Budget & Cost Model
Next Step Next Step Next Step Next Step VIS VIS VIS VIS IONI IONING IONING IONI PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING PROGRAMMING DES DES DES DES IGN IGN IGN IGN DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DELIVERY DELIVER DELIVER DELIVERY Based on Program Based on Program Planning / Analysis Conceptual Design Schematic Design
Visioning
Benchmarking
Instructional Space Instructional Space Concepts and Issues Concepts and Issues p Progressive Classrooms Technology Integration Observation (video/direct) Pedagogy Class Size Group Work / Breakout Flexibility Simulation Problem Based Learning Distance Learning Online Learning Podcasting
Instructional Space Instructional Space Concepts and Issues Concepts and Issues p Progressive Classrooms Technology Integration Observation (video and direct) Pedagogy Class Size Group Work / Breakout Flexibility Simulation Problem Based Learning Distance Learning Online Learning Podcasting
Information Commons Concept Information Commons Concept
Success Factors Success Factors The design of the building must be student-centered, enabling group study and promoting emotional attachment to the institution. Learning environments must be technologically advanced The building should be flexible and adaptable to support changing needs over time over time The building should embody sustainable design principles and be durable and maintainable The organization of the building should support and promote collaborative research. The facility should create an iconic image for the College of Education The building should provide up to date specialized spaces important to the mission of the College of Education the mission of the College of Education The building should be a warm and comfortable environment, and exude the concept of family. The environment should display a focus on education and human development.
QUALITY MODEL QUALITY MODEL In general order of priority In general order of priority In general order of priority In general order of priority Interior Aesthetics HIGH HIGH Maintainability Envelope Quality Technology Construction Quality MEDIUM Sustainability Energy Efficiency Security/Safety Security/Safety LOW Architectural Image
The six categories of LEED: 14 Credits Sustainable Sites 05 Water Efficiency 17 Energy & Atmosphere 13 13 M t Materials & Resources i l & R 15 Indoor Environmental Quality 05 Innovation & Design Process LEED rating scale: 52 69 52-69 Platinum Platinum 39-51 Gold 33-38 Silver 26-32 Certified 59 P i t 59 P i t 59 Points on the scorecard 59 Points on the scorecard th th d d
User Survey User Survey
Desired Essence of Sangren Hall 1. Clean 2. Technological 3. Modern 4. Innovative 5. Friendly
Things Sangren Hall Needs 1. Updated Image 2. Variety of Classrooms/Teaching Spaces 3. Updated Large Lecture Halls 4. Updated Multimedia Capabilities 5. Improved Café Space
Level of Importance of Features
Beneficial Work Areas for Students
Survey Comments LEED certification. We need to carry on the positive image of Adult learning principles include active learning. Classroom the Health and Human Services Building. Not only currently are very traditional. Individual desks should be recognizable, marketable, and attractive, but also replaced with easily movable tables and chairs to support small environmentally sound. group activities and experiential learning in the classroom. Thank you. Right now, Sangren Hall has the openness of an ant farm or Leave the building and put the money towards other crap! obstacle course. People wander around trying to find rooms that may be in adjacent hallways. Students line the corridors, waiting for their classes, typically spralling and leaving little to no Sangren Hall should be a Center Piece and Inspiration for the walkpath. walkpath rest of Campus. Good design with cutting edge technology will f C G d d i i h i d h l ill show WMU is looking to the future. Michigans new initiative is I have taught classes in Sangren, and classroom functionality is green jobs so Sagren Hall should reflect how WMU is helping my primary concern. My priority is that the classrooms and Michigan and it's future. I heard that a University in Detroit was lecture halls have cutting edge teaching technology, and are going to install a wind turbine on the top of a campus building designed to enhance student/teacher interaction and designed to enhance student/teacher interaction and to power the computer labs and more in the near future I think to power the computer labs and more in the near future. I think communication--even the large lecture halls. this is a great idea for innovation. The education library is a vital part of this renovation and its role While it may not fit into the budget, it would be a fantastic and in the operation of the College of Education should be unique idea to have the building generate some renewable q g g considered as the renovation is planned. considered as the renovation is planned. energy. Whether it's a collection of solar panels or a scaled down wind farm, it would put a spotlight on the building and promote Take out the Asbestos. Take out the stink. The cleaning awareness on the subject. chemicals make Sangren smell like a urinal. I like my quiet corner of Sangren. Sure there are some water l k f h The parking lot in front of Sangren Hall is probably the most h k l f f ll b bl h leaks and some heating/cooling issues, but that means it's quite ridiculous thing I have ever seen on a college campus!!! Rip out &and I get a lot accomplished. For God's sake, don't make it that yellow asphalt and lay some grass down please! loud, vibrant or lively. I'll never get anything done!
Program
Program Summary Program Summary
Budget and Cost Model
Budget Summary Budget Summary Construction Cost (199,130 gsf) $48,551,000 • Construction • D Design and Review i d R i • Management and Construction Inspection Owner Cost $9,377,000 • • Contingency Contingency • Furnishings • Equipment • Technology • Telecom Equipment • Signage • Relocation (move-out) Estimated Project Cost Estimated Project Cost $57 928 000 $57,928,000 Total Project Budget $56,000,000
Cost Benchmarking Cost Benchmarking
Cost Benchmarking Cost Benchmarking Renovation Cost = $200/gsf New Construction = $220/gsf New Construction = $220/gsf Area of Renovation Supported by Project Budget = 200,000gsf / 120,000nsf
Reconciliation Reconciliation Programmed Gross Area g 312,255 gsf g Programmed Net Area 187,353 nsf Target Gross Area g 200,000 gsf , g Target Net Area 120,000 nsf ------------------------------------------------------------------- Reduction Target Reduction Target 67,353 nsf 67,353 nsf
Reconciliation Strategies Reconciliation Strategies Potential Area Reductions • FCS, Dean of Research, Graduate College NIC • Classrooms (quantity/size/type) • Library/Information Commons y • Building Resources (Commons, Meeting Rooms, Etc.) • Across the board reductions ------------------------------------------------------------------- Reduction Target 67,000 nsf
Sangren Hall
Recommend
More recommend
