s terling college required communication
play

S terling College Required Communication Unqualified opinion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PRES ENTATION OF JUNE 30, 2015 AUDITED FINANCIAL S TATEMENTS October 16, 2015 S terling College Required Communication Unqualified opinion GAAS and GAS reasonable but not absolute assurance S ignificant accounting


  1. PRES ENTATION OF JUNE 30, 2015 AUDITED FINANCIAL S TATEMENTS October 16, 2015 S terling College

  2. Required Communication  Unqualified opinion  GAAS and GAS – reasonable but not absolute assurance  S ignificant accounting policies  Management j udgments and accounting estimates  Allowance for bad debts  Depreciation  Audit adj ustments – 12  Eight of these entries were proposed by Deb during the course of the audit. One entry proposed by audit team was material.  Disagreements with management – None  No difficulties encountered when performing the audit  Good initial meetings and weekly communications helped streamline the audit process

  3. Highlights and Comments  S tatement of Financial Position  Decrease in cash of roughly $507K primarily due to purchases if fixed assets and fact that a large portion of current contributions were in receivables.  Increase in pledges receivable by $1.2M (primarily due to AG pledge)  Prepaid expenses increase of $24K mainly due to Labrador and S ierra NV GFS Courses  Construction in progress decreased $62K due to completion of the wireless proj ect and less work on the barn proj ect.  Investments increased $100K due to earnings.

  4. Highlights and Comments  S tatement of Financial Position  Property and equipment increased by $1.7M net of accumulated depreciation due to real estate acquisition, equipment and renovations place in service.  Accrued expenses decreased by $90K included $40K decrease in student accounts payable with much of the remaining decrease due to reduced payroll tax and retirement plan accruals in 2015 versus 2014.  Unearned tuition increased by about $76K due to an increase in enrollment for that period of 37 students.  Long-term debt increased $408K due to spending on capital proj ects.

  5. Highlights and Comments  S tatement of Activities  $1.31M in net income primarily due to increases in student tuition and fees, auxiliary enterprises (24% of tuition in 2015 and 27% of tuition in 2014), and in contributions (up $1.2M)  Expenses increased $937K mostly due to increased student aid (due to increase in students) and program services.

  6. Discussion Items  Current Y ear  Increase board involvement  No significant deficiencies in current year  Be diligent about enforcing good policy i.e. segregation of duties

  7. Balance S heet Ratios  Ratios 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Days cash on hand 18 18 3 32 2 Days revenue in receivables 10 6 8 16 23 – excluding bequest Current ratio – excluding 0.98 0.38 0.33 1.12 .41 bequest Quick ratio – excluding 0.89 1.10 0.24 1.05 .36 bequest Debt to net assets 20% 18% 21% 20% 21%

  8. Income S tatement Ratios  Ratios 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Program expense % 84% 86% 84% 84% 84% Management expense % 15% 12% 13% 13% 13% Fundraising expense % 1% 2% 3% 3% 3% Fundraising efficiency 89% 90% 79% 88% 93%

  9. Analysis Total Support and Revenue $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,661,954 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,094,149 $6,000,000 $5,243,339 $5,000,000 Total S upport and $4,693,781 $4,869,902 Revenue $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  10. Analysis Change in Net Assets $1,500,000 $1,311,994 $1,000,000 $681,241 $500,000 $319,366 Change in Net Assets $86,223 $0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 -$500,000 -$520,950 -$1,000,000

  11. Analysis Program Service Fees Program $7,000,000 S ervice Fees $6,195,966 $6,000,000 $5,399,081 $5,000,000 $4,552,131 $4,236,958 $4,000,000 $3,858,318 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  12. Analysis Personnel Expenses Personnel Expenses $2,500,000 $2,351,752 $2,228,829 $2,000,000 $1,981,868 $1,858,901 $1,737,159 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  13. Analysis Personnel as % of Total Support Personnel as 45.0% % of Total S upport 40.0% 40.7% 37.0% 35.0% 34.8% 35.5% 30.0% 27.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Recommend


More recommend