road to a resilient heartland webinar series
play

Road to a Resilient Heartland Webinar Series: Building the Business - PDF document

Road to a Resilient Heartland Webinar Series: Building the Business Case for LEED Wednesday, October 21, 2020 1 Lana Cr Lana Crouse ouse Regional Lead, Market Transformation & Development East North Central USGBC lcrouse@usgbc.org East


  1. Road to a Resilient Heartland Webinar Series: Building the Business Case for LEED Wednesday, October 21, 2020 1

  2. Lana Cr Lana Crouse ouse Regional Lead, Market Transformation & Development East North Central USGBC lcrouse@usgbc.org East North Central Region of U.S. Map USGBC 2

  3. USGBC DETROIT REGION ANNUAL SPONSORS GOLD SPONSOR SILVER SPONSORS BRONZE SPONSORS USGBC INDIANA ANNUAL SPONSORS PLATINUM SPONSOR GOLD SPONSOR SILVER SPONSORS BRONZE SPONSORS 3

  4. USGBC OHIO ANNUAL SPONSORS SILVER SPONSORS CERTIFIED SPONSOR Event Sponsor 4

  5. Moderator Laur Laura L a Long ng Studio Manager, Senior Associate NORR laura.long@norr.com OUR SPEAKERS Daniel Overbey Keith Winn Michael Berning LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C, ID+C, O+M), LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C, ID+C) LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C), PE, CEM WELL AP, AIA, EcoDistricts AP President Chief Innovation Officer Assistant Professor, Ball State University Catalyst Partners Heapy Director of Sustainability, Browning Day 5

  6. Daniel Ov Daniel Overbe erbey LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C, ID+C, O+M), WELL AP, EcoDistricts AP Assistant Professor, Ball State University Director of Sustainability, Browning Day doverbey@browningday.com 6

  7. Building a business case for dd LEED – in our own numbers. Michael Berning PE, CEM, LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C) Chief Innovation Officer Heapy mjberning@heapy.com 7

  8. “At only the 1% completion mark of a typical project… …up to 70% of all Design Decisions have been made” Early involvement by all project partners is critical. Project “Partners” include: Building Owner, Users and Owner’s Facility Staff Architectural, Engineering and Construction Team Commissioning Authority Critical Project Element Keith Winn LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C, ID+C) President Catalyst Partners keith@catalyst-partners.com 8

  9. Daniel Ov Daniel Overbe erbey LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C, ID+C, O+M) Assistant Professor, Ball State University Director of Sustainability, Browning Day doverbey@browningday.com 9

  10. 10

  11. 11

  12. 12

  13. 13

  14. 14

  15. 15

  16. Michael Berning PE, CEM, LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C) Chief Innovation Officer Heapy mjberning@heapy.com 16

  17. Case Studies Franklin County Court House – LEED Gold Key Project & Green Features: • 300,000 SF • Integrated Design From Day One • $100 Million Estimated Project Cost • Energy Modeling Optimized Design 17

  18. Franklin County Court House – LEED Gold Sustainable Strategies Summary: • Integrated Design Approach • Total Construction Cost Reduction: • BIM Tools – Design Optimization $1.6 M & Clash Detection • Total Estimated Energy / Utility • Building Envelope Optimization Savings: $130,000 Annually! • Produced 200 Cooling Ton Reduction • Total Estimated Water Usage • Mech-Elec Systems Optimization Savings: Over 500,000 Gallons • Efficient HVAC, Lighting, Annually & Water Systems Heapy Headquarters – LEED Platinum Key Project & Green Features: • 45,000 SF, $4.4 Million • Daylight Harvesting & Occupancy Sensors • 1.25% Green Project Premium • Highly Efficient HVAC Systems • $17,000 Commissioning Savings • 27% ROI • 35% Annual Energy Savings ($1.38/SF) 18

  19. Heapy Headquarters – LEED-EB:O+M Platinum Energy Profile Heapy Engineering After Occupancy: Original Model (Baseline) 4000 Original Model (Proposed) 3500 Actual Utility Usage 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Energy Consumption Wright State University: Diggs Laboratory – LEED Gold Key Project & Green Features: • $11.7 Million Project Cost • Energy Cost Savings +40% vs Code • 4% Below Project Budget • Return on Investment: Immediate! • INTEGRATED DESIGN • $ ZERO Green Project Cost Premium 19

  20. Wright State University: Diggs Laboratory – LEED Gold Bio III Energy Usage Comparison Energy Profile Original Model (Baseline) 10000 Original Model (Proposed) After Occupancy: Post Occupancy EM (Proposed) 9000 Actual Utility Bills 8000 7000 Total Btu/yr (10^6) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Energy Models Setterlin Headquarters Key Project & Green Features: • 13,000 sf, $1.2 Million • Reused Over 90% of Existing • Open Loop Groundwater-Based Heat Abandoned Structure Pump System • Diverted Over 80% of Construction • Over 32% Annual Energy Cost Waste from Landfill Reduction 20

  21. Setterlin Headquarters Setterlin Energy Profile $35,000 After Occupancy: Original Model (Baseline) $30,000 Original Model (Proposed) Actual Electric Bill $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $- Electricity Usage Cost Keith Winn LEED Fellow, LEED AP (BD+C, ID+C) President Catalyst Partners keith@catalyst-partners.com 21

  22. + Rockford Construction LEED for New Construction – Platinum 2016 22

  23. L OCATION , L OCATION , L OCATION Revitalize the Urban Core & Connect to local Transportation Systems + Optimizing Energy Use “When just 1% of a project’s upfront costs are spent, up to 70% of its life cycle costs may already be committed; when 7% of a project’s upfront costs are spent, up to 85% of its life cycle cost have been committed.” T he Natural Advantage of Nations: “Business Opportunities, Innovations and Governance in the 21 st Century.” 23

  24. D AYLIGHT S IMULATION Schematic Design with 40% glass adjusted to 33% without compromising views. Annual savings include 12,500 kWhs and 3,000 therms equating to $4,000 M ATERIALS Building Reuse results in Carbon Reduction Walls, Staircases and Case goods made from Salvaged Ash Trees 24

  25. + CircuitWest.com Testing Utility Scale Solar & Storage + Dwelling Place St. James Apartments 25

  26. + What can we cultivate together? “In order to feel really secure, you must feel secure in change.” – Charles Eames 26

  27. Questions? 27

Recommend


More recommend