Revel Ridge Project 1996-1998 Weymin Option from Equinox (Hecla) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Company Presentation – May 2020 1952 Asarco option with trenching on Main Zone to south ROKMASTER RESOURCES CORP. 1962-1965 Westairs Ltd. option, new 830 Level in 297 meters 1980-1991 Leased by Pan American-Opioned to BP-Selco, Noranda, Equinox and JV by Revel Ridge Project 1996-1998 Weymin Option from Equinox (Hecla) 2004 Bac-Tech Option 2007- 2019 Merit Mining Corp. option and purchase from estate of T.E. Arnold (na In (formerly the J&L Property) Targ argetin ing ex expansio ion an and pro production of of mass assive sulp sulphide go gold ld & poly poly-metall llics In In sou south-central Brit Britis ish Col Columbia

2 Cautionary Statement This presentation contains “forward -looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities regulations and “forward -looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward -looking information”) . The forward-looking information contained in this presentation is made as of the date of this presentation. Except as required under applicable securities legislation, Rokmaster Resources Corp. (“RKR”) does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update this forward-looking information. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the timing and update of the historic 2012 PEA; the potential for expansion, new discoveries and future cash flows; future price of minerals and the effects thereof; the estimation of mineralization; the timing and amount of estimated capital expenditures; costs and timing of proposed activities; plans and budgets for and expected results of exploration activities; permitting time-lines; requirements for additional capital; government regulation of mining operations; environmental risks; reclamation obligations and expenses; title disputes or claims, adequacy of insurance coverage, the availability of qualified labour, acquisition plans and strategies, the payment of dividends in the future, and RKR’s use of the proceeds of an Offering. Often, but not always, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or the negatives thereof or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. This forward-looking information is based on certain assumptions that RKR believes are reasonable, including that the current price of and demand for minerals being targeted by RKR will be sustained or will improve, the supply of minerals targeted by RKR will remain stable, that RKR ’s current exploration programs and objectives can be achieved, that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed on reasonable terms and that RKR will not experience any material accident, labour dispute, or failure of plant or equipment. While RKR considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of RKR to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such factors include, among others, the risk that actual results of exploration activities will be different than anticipated, the cost of labour, equipment or materials increase more than expected, that the future price of minerals targeted by RKR will decline, that changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined may result in increased costs, that plant, equipment or processes will fail to operate as anticipated, that accidents, labour disputes and other risks generally associated with mining may occur and that unanticipated delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities may occur. Although RKR has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information due to the inherent uncertainty thereof. The scientific and technical information about the Revel Ridge Project (the “Property”) set out in this presentation was substantially obtained from the National Instrument 43-101 compliant Technical Report for the Property dated January 29, 2020, (the “Technical Report”) authored by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. for RKR and filed on SEDAR on February 25, 2020. Mark Rebagliati, P. Eng., a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43- 101 Standards of Disclosure for Mining Projects, has reviewed and approved of the technical disclosure in this presentation. .

3 Merits of the Project ▪ Mineral Resource Estimate: Main (gold) Zone tonnes and grade include; Main Zone M&I : 4,200,000 MT / 1,089,000 ounces AuEq @ 8.07 g/t AuEq * Main Zone Inf : 4,562,000 MT / 961,000 ounces AuEq @ 6.55 g/t AuEq * (excludes both Hanging Wall and Foot Wall Zones) ▪ Yellowjacket Zone I nd: 764,000 MT @ 9.98% Zn + 2.61% Pb + 62.8g/t Ag ▪ Exceptional potential to double all historic resources (only 1,500m of the currently known 3,000m of Main Zone strike length has been drilled) ▪ Overall good infrastructure, 45 km by all-weather road from the industrial city of Revelstoke, BC, Pop. 8,500, and on rail and national highway ▪ Good grade polymetallic massive sulphide gold zone - suitable for direct ship concentrates or POX pre-treatment with high Au recoveries ▪ Good grade zinc-silver zone with excellent recovery to clean concentrates ▪ Current NI 43-101 Technical Report (see slide 15, 16) ▪ Historical 2012 Ni 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment * AuEq= Au g/T + (Ag g/T x 0.011) + (Pb % x 0.422) + (Zn % x 0.455). This incorporates Ag, Pb and Zn metallurgical recoveries, smelter payables and refining charges that were reflected in the 2012 Preliminary Economic Assessment. M&I = Measured and Indicated mineral resources, Inf = Inferred Mineral Resources, MT = Metric Tonnes.

4 Merits of the Deal ▪ Option to purchase 100% of a good grade >2M oz AuEq poly-metallic deposit & a high grade Zn – Ag deposit ▪ Cash option for 100% ▪ No share payments ▪ No royalties ▪ No advance royalty payments ▪ No work commitments ▪ Canadian jurisdiction ▪ Defined regulatory and tax structure ▪ Operating team has successful area experience in permitting, construction and mine operation in the region