retrofitny design
play

RetrofitNY Design Workshop Revolutionizing Building Renovations in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RetrofitNY Design Workshop Revolutionizing Building Renovations in New York State 10.30.17 2 11:00 11:10am Welcome & Session Overview 11:10 11:20am RetrofitNY Introduction 11:20 12:10pm Guest Speakers and Q&A Panel


  1. RetrofitNY Design Workshop Revolutionizing Building Renovations in New York State 10.30.17

  2. 2 11:00 – 11:10am Welcome & Session Overview ▪ 11:10 – 11:20am RetrofitNY Introduction ▪ 11:20 – 12:10pm Guest Speakers and Q&A Panel ▪ 12:10 – 12:30pm Break + Working Lunch ▪ Agenda 12:30 – 12:50pm RFP Overview ▪ 12:50 – 1:35pm Cross-Cutting Team Networking Exercise ▪ 1:35 – 1:55pm RFP Participation Overview ▪ 1:55 – 2:00pm Closing/Next Steps ▪ 2:00 – 3:00pm Informal Networking ▪

  3. 3 What is RetrofitNY?

  4. 4 Creating a large scale, self-sustaining market for high performance retrofit solutions Industry-designed, cost-effective retrofit solutions for tenanted buildings reaching or approaching net-zero energy. Implement solutions on a large scale to drive industrialization and reduce costs.

  5. 5 Net-Zero Energy Retrofits… or close to it Benefits ▪ Residents ▪ Health & Comfort ▪ Quality of Life ▪ Building Owners ▪ City & State ▪ Environmental Impact ▪ Affordable Housing Preservation

  6. 6 Woodrow Wilson Apartments Amsterdam, NY Circa 2014

  7. 7 Woodrow Wilson Apartments Amsterdam, NY Circa 2016 Courtesy: Beacon Communities, LLC

  8. 8

  9. 9 Revolutionizing the way multifamily Funds Products buildings are Finance renovated, keeping residents in their Housing Concepts Authorities homes. Business Demand Supply Model Private Components Regulation Nyserda.ny.gov/RetrofitNY Local State

  10. 10 A successful model to show market potential Cost per Unit & Performance of Retrofits By reaching scale, this solution will become the standard. This is where the market is headed, and you can be ahead of the curve.

  11. 11 Guest Speaker Presentations and Q&A

  12. 12 Sadie McKeown Executive Vice President & COO, Community Preservation Corporation

  13. 13 About CPC The Community Preservation Corporation (CPC) believes housing is central to transforming underserved neighborhoods into thriving, vibrant communities.

  14. 14 About CPC ▪ CPC is a nonprofit affordable ▪ Our goal is to be more than just housing and community a lender. At CPC, we work as a revitalization finance company partner to provide technical providing flexible capital expertise, support and flexible solutions, fresh thinking and a solutions that help meet the collaborative approach to the capital needs and broader complex issues facing community revitalization goals of communities. our customers, local stakeholders and the communities we serve.

  15. 15 CPC Approach CPC’s financing methodology integrates energy efficiency and water conservation (EEWC) measures into a traditional multifamily mortgage. ID EEWC Lower Increased Measures Expenses Income Proceeds Additional Larger Loan Cover EEWC Debt Service

  16. 16 High Performance & Operation Savings Data and Lessons 2015 Utility Expense Comparison $500 $450 $400 $350 $325 $300 $250 $231 $200 $78 $150 $86 $100 $140 $132 $99 $50 $90 $- CPC M&O Standard Traditional Green Passive House #1 Passive House #2 Electric Gas

  17. 17 Monetizing the Benefits Investing in energy efficiency and renewables reduce utility bills and operating expenses. When expenses decrease, net operating income (NOI) will increase. A higher NOI means a building can support additional private debt. When mortgage lenders monetize energy savings, borrowers can utilize low-cost, long-term capital to finance energy investments.

  18. 18 Monetizing the Benefits TRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL GREEN PASSIVE HOUSE Private Debt Construction Cost Monetizing projected energy savings allow a building to support additional private debt. Now, loan proceeds can be used to fund deeper retrofits and larger energy investments.

  19. 19 Monetizing the Benefits TRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL GREEN PASSIVE HOUSE Private Debt Public Subsidy Construction Cost In affordable housing, if construction costs remain the same, additional debt can be used to offset the need for public subsidy.

  20. 20 Case Study Passive House 123 1 st ST 24 Units 24,000 sq ft

  21. 21 Case Study Underwriting Passive House – Nassau County

  22. 22 ▪ Start a conversation ▪ Listen, process, roll up your sleeves ▪ Underwriting to savings Recommendations ▪ Strong partnerships & collaboration ▪ Be creative

  23. 23 Duncan Barrett President, Beacon Communities Development, LLC

  24. 24 Affordable Housing Sustainability Achieving sustainability for affordable housing assets is critical to this industry, especially right now. ▪ Recent political events ▪ Need for industry and resident education around energy ▪ Strong desire to improve the quality of life for tenants

  25. 25 ▪ Wages Variable Costs ▪ Insurance ▪ Energy

  26. 26 Energy is the variable cost that we have the highest opportunity to contain.

  27. 27 Our Goal We need to build and retrofit affording housing to be nominally net-zero and meet Passive House Standards, in a mission-driven effort to improve the quality of life of our residents.

  28. 28 Case Study Martin Luther King in Troy, New York Phase 1/2: Colored Rehab Site Plan

  29. 29 Phase 2: Site Plan (Rehab & Construction)

  30. 30 PV Solar Array

  31. 31 Opportunities through the RFP ▪ Building competitiveness and ▪ Reducing maintenance and resiliency in the marketplace management time and cost ▪ Improving the quality of life ▪ Participating in the first wave for our residents of movers

  32. 32 Tom King Architect, King & King Architects

  33. 33 Our Goal We strive to lead the charge in terms of sustainability and evidence-based design. RetrofitNY will help us to grow within relevant markets and expand our relationships with consultants and clients throughout New York State.

  34. 34 Case Study Installing a 250 kW parking lot canopy array for our building 250KW PV Array: Fall 2017

  35. 35 Case Study Installing a 250 kW parking lot canopy array for our building

  36. 36 Case Study Installing a 250 kW parking lot canopy array for our building k+k� Yearly� Electric� Power 450000 400000 350000 300000 250000 10%� load� reduction� 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total� KWh� Consumed Total� KWh� Produced Predictided� KWh� Produced Data: Reduction Strategy

  37. 37 Case Study Designing a Net-Zero School in North Syracuse

  38. 38 Case Study Designing a Net-Zero School in North Syracuse ENERGY� COST� SAVINGS Target� EUI 120000 160 141.8 140 100000 120 80000 100 $47,977� 89.1 $57,569� $67,160� 60000 80 70.9 $82,606� $95,934� 56.7 60 40000 44.5 42.5 40 35.6 34.4 $47,957� 26.7 20000 21.6 $38,365� 20 $28,774� $13,328� 0 0 Median� Property� 50%� Better 60%� Better 70%� Better Net� Zero� Ready Median� Property� 50%� Better 60%� Better 70%� Better Net� Zero� Ready Site� EUI� kBtu/sf� yr) Source� EUI� (kBtu/sf� yr) Site� Energy� Cost� ($/yr) Savings� ($/yr)

  39. 39 Case Study Designing a Net-Zero School in North Syracuse

  40. 40 Case Study Designing a Net-Zero School in North Syracuse

  41. 41

  42. 42

  43. 43 Opportunities through the RFP ▪ Developing a replicable model ▪ Offering a huge potential to for retrofits, allowing us to go show what can be done for from nearing net-zero to retrofits, even beyond the achieving net-zero housing market ▪ Following an approach that ▪ Building upon and streamlining includes and benefits all a comprehensive approach involved parties – from from design through architects to financers to construction building managers

  44. 44 Paul Bertram President, PRB Connect

  45. 45 Case Study Delivering a High Performance, Deep Energy, Resilient, Low Income, Multifamily Enclosure Retrofit in Castle Square, Boston Existing Façade New Façade Zero Insulation R-40

  46. 46 What went wrong? ▪ Commissioning was not done ▪ The goal 72% energy until a year after completion reduction was missed ▪ Enclosure commissioning was not done following ASTM E2813 – 12e1 Standard Practice for Building Enclosure Commissioning

  47. 47 What went right? ▪ Castle Square was a ▪ Tenants could stay in units collaborative effort that (with some disruption included the Tenants scheduling) Association ▪ Tenants saw about 50% ▪ The exterior system was reduction in energy bills (gas engineered with sound & electric) building science by bringing in an Enclosure Specialist

  48. 48 Right and Wrong The modeled energy efficiency reduction goals were conceptually obtainable

  49. 49 The Vision for Greater “Certainty” in Delivering System Performance

  50. 50 Off-Site Construction, Panelized/Prefabricated Construction as part of the Deep Energy Exterior System Solution

  51. 51 Opportunities through the RFP ▪ Building scalable and ▪ Enabling social benefits, as replicable high performance, tenants can remain in the deep energy retrofit solutions building during retrofits ▪ Mobilizing cross-functional ▪ Creating resilience in New teams to form these solutions York’s building infrastructure through a collaborative design process

Recommend


More recommend