rethinking gauge theory through connes noncommutative
play

Rethinking Gauge Theory through Connes Noncommutative Geometry Chen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 22, 2023 •179 likes •1.27k views

Rethinking Gauge Theory through Connes Noncommutative Geometry Chen Sun Virginia Tech October 24, 2015 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 1 / 44 Work with Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, Tatsu Takeuchi: Phys. Rev. D

  1. A = C ⊕ C By analogy, can calculate the ‘distance’ between the two points in A = C ⊕ C . Introduce the third element, the generalization of Dirac operator, � � 0 m D = . m 0 The distance formula is d ( x , y ) = sup {| a ( x ) − a ( y ) | : a ∈ A , � [ D , a ] � ≤ 1 } . Distance between the two points d ( p 1 , p 2 ) = sup {| a ( p 1 ) − a ( p 2 ) |} a ∈A , � [ D , a ] �≤ 1 | λ − λ ′ | = sup ( λ,λ ′ ) ∈A , � [ D , a ] �≤ 1 = 1 | m | . The generalized Dirac operator encodes the distance information! Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 16 / 44

  2. A = C ⊕ C A = C ⊕ C , H = C N ⊕ C N , � � M † 0 D = . M 0 For a ∈ A = ( λ, λ ′ ) , the ‘differential’ is ∼ ( λ − λ ′ ) : � � − M † 0 [ D , a ] = ( λ − λ ′ ) , M 0 By analogy with ǫ → 0 ( f ( x + ǫ ) − f ( x )) d x µ df = ∂ µ f d x µ = lim ǫ . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 17 / 44

  3. A = C ⊕ C A = C ⊕ C , H = C N ⊕ C N , � � M † 0 D = . M 0 For a ∈ A = ( λ, λ ′ ) , the ‘differential’ is ∼ ( λ − λ ′ ) : � � − M † 0 [ D , a ] = ( λ − λ ′ ) , M 0 By analogy with ǫ → 0 ( f ( x + ǫ ) − f ( x )) d x µ df = ∂ µ f d x µ = lim ǫ . The ‘integral’ is ∼ ( λ + λ ′ ) : Tr ( a ) = λ + λ ′ . By analogy with � f ( x ) d x . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 17 / 44

  4. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  5. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. They correspond to a representation space ∼ H L ⊕ H R , or H f ⊕ H f . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  6. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. They correspond to a representation space ∼ H L ⊕ H R , or H f ⊕ H f . It is natural to equip the spectral triple ( A , H , D ) with another object, γ , the grading operator. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  7. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. They correspond to a representation space ∼ H L ⊕ H R , or H f ⊕ H f . It is natural to equip the spectral triple ( A , H , D ) with another object, γ , the grading operator. For example, In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ∞ ( M ) , Γ( M , S ) , i / ∂ ) , γ = γ 5 . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  8. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. They correspond to a representation space ∼ H L ⊕ H R , or H f ⊕ H f . It is natural to equip the spectral triple ( A , H , D ) with another object, γ , the grading operator. For example, In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ∞ ( M ) , Γ( M , S ) , i / ∂ ) , γ = γ 5 . � � M † 0 In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ⊕ C , C N ⊕ C N , ) , we can choose M 0 the grading operator to be γ = diag (1 , ..., 1 , − 1 , ..., − 1 ) � �� � � �� � N copies N copies Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  9. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. They correspond to a representation space ∼ H L ⊕ H R , or H f ⊕ H f . It is natural to equip the spectral triple ( A , H , D ) with another object, γ , the grading operator. For example, In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ∞ ( M ) , Γ( M , S ) , i / ∂ ) , γ = γ 5 . � � M † 0 In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ⊕ C , C N ⊕ C N , ) , we can choose M 0 the grading operator to be γ = diag (1 , ..., 1 , − 1 , ..., − 1 ) � �� � � �� � N copies N copies A device that helps us distinguish one part from the other. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  10. Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 . e.g. the model with U (1) Y × SU (2) L , or SU (2) R × SU (2) L , etc. They correspond to a representation space ∼ H L ⊕ H R , or H f ⊕ H f . It is natural to equip the spectral triple ( A , H , D ) with another object, γ , the grading operator. For example, In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ∞ ( M ) , Γ( M , S ) , i / ∂ ) , γ = γ 5 . � � M † 0 In the case of ( A , H , D ) = ( C ⊕ C , C N ⊕ C N , ) , we can choose M 0 the grading operator to be γ = diag (1 , ..., 1 , − 1 , ..., − 1 ) � �� � � �� � N copies N copies A device that helps us distinguish one part from the other. D , A = A 1 ⊕ A 2 ∼ two sheets structure. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 18 / 44

  11. A = C ⊕ H – A toy model A = C ⊕ H , H = C 2 ⊕ C 2 , � � M † 0 D = . M 0 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 19 / 44

  12. A = C ⊕ H – A toy model A = C ⊕ H , H = C 2 ⊕ C 2 , � � M † 0 D = . M 0 How do we fit this with our particle spectrum? ‘Flavor’ space:         1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0         ν R =  , e R =  , ν L =  , e L =  .  0  0  1  0 0 0 0 1   λ λ   For any a ∈ A , a =  .  α β − β α � � m ν 0 To give mass terms out of ψ † D ψ , let M = . 0 m e Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 19 / 44

  13. The unitary transformations are { u ∈ A| u † u = uu † = 1 } . This implies   e i θ e − i θ   | α | 2 + | β | 2 = 1 . u =  , s.t.   α β  − β α which automatically fulfills det u = 1 . This is the symmetry U (1) R × SU (2) L . The U (1) R charge is |↑� |↓� 2 R 1 − 1 2 L 0 0 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 20 / 44

  14. When we make the U (1) R × SU (2) L transformation, L =Ψ † D Ψ �→ Ψ † u † Du Ψ = Ψ † D Ψ + Ψ † u † [ D , u ]Ψ . � �� � the ‘local’ twist In general [ D , u ] � = 0 , therefore, this demands for a ‘gauge’ field to absorb the local twist, in the discrete direction. According to our recipe, we do have a gauge field between the two sheets, � A = a i [ D , b i ] . i L =Ψ † ( D + A )Ψ �→ Ψ † D Ψ + Ψ † u † [ D , u ]Ψ + Ψ † A Ψ − Ψ † u † [ D , u ]Ψ =Ψ † ( D + A )Ψ Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 21 / 44

  15. Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is � � M † Φ † A = , Φ M � φ 1 � φ 2 Φ = [ φ 1 φ 2 ] = − φ 2 φ 1 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 22 / 44

  16. Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is � � M † Φ † A = , Φ M � � M † (Φ † + 1) D + A = . (Φ + 1) M Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 22 / 44

  17. Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is � � M † Φ † A = , Φ M � � M † (Φ † + 1) D + A = . (Φ + 1) M The perturbation of ‘ D 2 ’ derived from the (spectral) action: � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � � ( MM † ) 2 � ( | Φ + 1 | 2 − 1) 2 . ∼ Tr Tr Tr Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 22 / 44

  18. Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is � � M † Φ † A = , Φ M � � M † (Φ † + 1) D + A = . (Φ + 1) M The perturbation of ‘ D 2 ’ derived from the (spectral) action: � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � � ( MM † ) 2 � ( | Φ + 1 | 2 − 1) 2 . ∼ Tr Tr Tr This gives us a Mexican-hat-shaped potential. A field expanded at the minimum � = 0 . By counting d.o.f, we have 4 + 4 − 4 = 4 real degrees, i.e. Φ is a pair of complex numbers. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 22 / 44

  19. Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is � � M † Φ † A = , Φ M � � M † (Φ † + 1) D + A = . (Φ + 1) M The perturbation of ‘ D 2 ’ derived from the (spectral) action: � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � � ( MM † ) 2 � ( | Φ + 1 | 2 − 1) 2 . ∼ Tr Tr Tr This gives us a Mexican-hat-shaped potential. A field expanded at the minimum � = 0 . By counting d.o.f, we have 4 + 4 − 4 = 4 real degrees, i.e. Φ is a pair of complex numbers. SSB now has a reason: D + A gives a VEV shift. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 22 / 44

  20. By analogy, e − i θ ∂ µ e i θ = ∂ µ θ u † [ D , u ] local ‘twist’   M † Φ † � a i [ D , b i ] = A µ d µ x ω   Φ M   M † d µ x basis   M comp’ A µ Φ � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � θ ( d + A ) ∧ ( d + A ) Tr ∼ F µν ∼ DA + A 2 ∼ ∂ µ A ν + [ A µ , A ν ] � � ( D + A ) 2 − D 2 � F µν F µν d 4 x ) 2 S ( Tr Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 23 / 44

  21. Product geometry Consider the algebra: A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊕ C ∞ ( M ) ∼ C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ C ) . This corresponds to a geometry F = M ⊕ M , ∼ M × { p 1 , p 2 } . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 24 / 44

  22. Product geometry Consider the algebra: A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊕ C ∞ ( M ) ∼ C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ C ) . This corresponds to a geometry F = M ⊕ M , ∼ M × { p 1 , p 2 } . Combining continuous part with C ⊕ H , A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ) . ∼ a double-layer structure. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 24 / 44

  23. The Dirac operator of the product geometry: ∂ + γ 5 ⊗ D . D x = i / The gauge field: Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 25 / 44

  24. The Dirac operator of the product geometry: ∂ + γ 5 ⊗ D . D x = i / The gauge field: � � f i [ / A x ∼ ∂, g i ] + a i [ D , b i ] � �� � � �� � A [1 , 0] A [0 , 1] Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 25 / 44

  25. The Dirac operator of the product geometry: ∂ + γ 5 ⊗ D . D x = i / The gauge field: � � f i [ / A x ∼ ∂, g i ] + a i [ D , b i ] � �� � � �� � A [1 , 0] A [0 , 1] � � Φ ∗ B ∼ . Φ W Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 25 / 44

  26. Highlights: A two sheet structure. A gauge field in between. SSB feature out of box. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 26 / 44

  27. Highlights: A two sheet structure. A gauge field in between. SSB feature out of box. ∼ Implies a Higgs as the discrete gauge, generated similarly as the continous gauge fields. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 26 / 44

  28. Color sector In order to reproduce SM, color sector must be involved. Introduce the ‘color’ space. H = C ⊕ C 3 , with basis         1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0         ℓ =  , r =  , g =  , b =  .     0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 A = C ⊕ M 3 ( C ) , with ∀ a ∈ A ,   λ m 11 m 12 m 13   a =  .  m 21 m 22 m 23 m 31 m 32 m 33 Symmetry group is { u ∈ A| u † u = uu † = 1 } , together with the ‘unimodularity’ condition, det u = 1 .  e − i θ   , m ′ ∈ SU (3) .   a = e i θ/ 3 m ′  Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 27 / 44

  29.  e − i θ   , m ′ ∈ SU (3) .   a = e i θ/ 3 m ′  This gives the U (1) charge ℓ r g b 1 1 1 − 1 3 3 3 We recognize them as B − L charge, and this gives us the symmetry U (1) B − L × SU (3) C . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 28 / 44

  30. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  31. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Introduce the bimodule representation:     |↑� R ℓ |↓� R r      ⊗  .  |↑� L  g |↓� L b Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  32. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Introduce the bimodule representation:     |↑� R ℓ |↓� R r      ⊗  .  |↑� L  g |↓� L b Denote the space as ( 2 R ⊕ 2 L ) ⊗ ( 1 ℓ ⊕ 3 C ) . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  33. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Introduce the bimodule representation:     |↑� R ℓ |↓� R r      ⊗  .  |↑� L  g |↓� L b Denote the space as ( 2 R ⊕ 2 L ) ⊗ ( 1 ℓ ⊕ 3 C ) . Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  34. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Introduce the bimodule representation:     |↑� R ℓ |↓� R r      ⊗  .  |↑� L  g |↓� L b Denote the space as ( 2 R ⊕ 2 L ) ⊗ ( 1 ℓ ⊕ 3 C ) . Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example ν L = |↑� L ⊗ ℓ ∈ 2 L ⊗ 1 ℓ , Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  35. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Introduce the bimodule representation:     |↑� R ℓ |↓� R r      ⊗  .  |↑� L  g |↓� L b Denote the space as ( 2 R ⊕ 2 L ) ⊗ ( 1 ℓ ⊕ 3 C ) . Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example d R , g = |↓� R ⊗ g Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  36. A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C ∞ ( M ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ H ⊕ M 3 ( C )) . Introduce the bimodule representation:     |↑� R ℓ |↓� R r      ⊗  .  |↑� L  g |↓� L b Denote the space as ( 2 R ⊕ 2 L ) ⊗ ( 1 ℓ ⊕ 3 C ) . Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example � r � d R = |↓� R ⊗ g ∈ 2 R ⊗ 3 C , b Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 29 / 44

  37. Introduce J , charge conjugate,         |↑� R ℓ ℓ |↑� R |↓� R r r |↓� R         J  ⊗  ∼  ⊗  ,  |↑� L  g  g  |↑� L |↓� L b b |↓� L ∀ a ∈ A with left action on flavor space as before, JaJ − 1 is the right action on color space. Ready to combine the previous result on flavor space and color space. |↑� |↓� ℓ r g b 2 R 1 − 1 1 1 1 − 1 3 3 3 2 L 0 0 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 30 / 44

  38. U (1) R : |↑� ⊗ 1 0 |↓� ⊗ 1 0 |↑� ⊗ 3 0 |↓� ⊗ 3 0 2 L 0 0 0 0 2 R 1 − 1 1 − 1 U (1) B − L : |↑� ⊗ 1 0 |↓� ⊗ 1 0 |↑� ⊗ 3 0 |↓� ⊗ 3 0 1 1 − 1 − 1 2 L 3 3 1 1 − 1 − 1 2 R 3 3 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 31 / 44

  39. |↑� ⊗ 1 0 |↓� ⊗ 1 0 |↑� ⊗ 3 0 |↓� ⊗ 3 0 1 1 2 L − 1 − 1 3 3 4 − 2 2 R 0 − 2 3 3 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 32 / 44

  40. Spectral Action According to Chamseddine et. al. (hep-th/9606001), one builds the action based on spectral action principle: The physical (bosonic) action only depends upon the spectrum of D. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 33 / 44

  41. Spectral Action According to Chamseddine et. al. (hep-th/9606001), one builds the action based on spectral action principle: The physical (bosonic) action only depends upon the spectrum of D. S spec = Tr ( f ( D A / Λ)) . We can expand it as � L ( g µν , A ) √ g d 4 x . Tr ( f ( D A / Λ)) ∼ M Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 33 / 44

  42. The bosonic action, S Bosonic = S Higgs + S YM + S Cosmology + S Riemann , � | D µ φ | 2 √ g d 4 x + − 2 af 2 Λ 2 + ef 0 � S Higgs = f 0 a | φ | 2 √ g d 4 x 2 π 2 π 2 � + f 0 b | φ | 4 √ g d 4 x , 2 π 2 S YM = f 0 µν ) 16 π 2 Tr ( F µν F � = f 0 µν i + g 2 µν i + 5 µν ) √ g d 4 x ( g 2 3 G i 2 W i 3 g 2 µν G µν W 1 B µν B 2 π 2 where the parameters are a = Tr ( M ∗ ν M ν + M ∗ e M e + 3( M ∗ u M u + M ∗ d M d )) ν M ν ) 2 + ( M ∗ e M e ) 2 + 3( M ∗ u M u ) 2 + 3( M ∗ b = Tr (( M ∗ d M d ) 2 ) c = Tr ( M ∗ R M R ) d = Tr (( M ∗ R M R ) 2 ) e = Tr ( M ∗ R M R M ∗ ν M ν ) , f n is the ( n − 1) th momentum of f . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 34 / 44

  43. Output: Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  44. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  45. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , � φ � � = 0 , Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  46. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , � φ � � = 0 , W = 1 2 + m i 2 + 3 m i 2 + 3 m i � 2 ) , M 2 i ( m i ν e u d 8 Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  47. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , � φ � � = 0 , W = 1 2 + m i 2 + 3 m i 2 + 3 m i � 2 ) , M 2 i ( m i ν e u d 8 Can be calculated from spectral action. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  48. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , � φ � � = 0 , W = 1 2 + m i 2 + 3 m i 2 + 3 m i 2 ) , � M 2 i ( m i ν e u d 8 Can be calculated from spectral action. Intuitively, Cont’ Disc’ ψ/ Ψ † D Ψ Fermion ∂ψ ∂ µ W ∂ µ W D 2 W 2 Boson Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  49. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , � φ � � = 0 , W = 1 2 + m i 2 + 3 m i 2 + 3 m i � 2 ) , M 2 i ( m i ν e u d 8 m H ≈ 170 GeV , Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  50. Output: 2 = 5 g 2 3 = g 2 3 g 2 1 , � φ � � = 0 , W = 1 2 + m i 2 + 3 m i 2 + 3 m i � 2 ) , M 2 i ( m i ν e u d 8 m H ≈ 170 GeV , problematic, which is naturally saved by the left-right completion we propose. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 35 / 44

  51. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  52. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , � δ L δφ δφ + δ L δ S = δ∂φδ∂φ � δ L � δ L � δ L � � = δφ δφ + ∂ δ∂φδφ − ∂ δφ δ∂φ � δ L � � EOM = ∂ δ∂φδφ � � � ǫ δ L = ∂ δ∂φ Φ � = ∂ ( ǫ j ) � � ∂ µ ( ǫ ) j µ + ǫ∂ µ j µ . = Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  53. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , � � � ∂ µ ( ǫ ) j µ + ǫ∂ µ j µ . δ S = ∂ ( ǫ j ) = ∂ µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) � = 0 , a local symmetry with a gauge. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  54. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , � � � ∂ µ ( ǫ ) j µ + ǫ∂ µ j µ . δ S = ∂ ( ǫ j ) = ∂ µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) � = 0 , a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ † D Ψ �→ Ψ † D Ψ + Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  55. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , � � � ∂ µ ( ǫ ) j µ + ǫ∂ µ j µ . δ S = ∂ ( ǫ j ) = ∂ µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) � = 0 , a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ † D Ψ �→ Ψ † D Ψ + Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ . Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ by analogy with ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  56. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , � � � ∂ µ ( ǫ ) j µ + ǫ∂ µ j µ . δ S = ∂ ( ǫ j ) = ∂ µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) � = 0 , a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ † D Ψ �→ Ψ † D Ψ + Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ . Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ by analogy with ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) . [ D , ǫ i σ i ] = 0 a ‘global’ symmetry in the discrete direction. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  57. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ �→ φ + δφ , with δφ = ǫ i σ i φ = ǫ i Φ i , � � � ∂ µ ( ǫ ) j µ + ǫ∂ µ j µ . δ S = ∂ ( ǫ j ) = ∂ µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) � = 0 , a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ † D Ψ �→ Ψ † D Ψ + Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ . Ψ † [ D , ǫ i σ i ]Ψ by analogy with ∂ µ ( ǫ j µ ) . [ D , ǫ i σ i ] = 0 a ‘global’ symmetry in the discrete direction. [ D , ǫ i σ i ] � = 0 a ‘local’ symmetry in the discrete direction, with a gauge. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 36 / 44

  58. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] = 0 refers to Du = uD , D = uDu † . ⇔ In SM, this refers to the VEV shift is invariant under the transformation u . This describes the transformation of VEV shift, or the symmetry under which vacuum is invariant. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 37 / 44

  59. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] = 0 refers to Du = uD , D = uDu † . ⇔ In SM, this refers to the VEV shift is invariant under the transformation u . This describes the transformation of VEV shift, or the symmetry under which vacuum is invariant. ∼ Remaining symmetry, Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 37 / 44

  60. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ [ D , u ] = 0 refers to Du = uD , D = uDu † . ⇔ In SM, this refers to the VEV shift is invariant under the transformation u . This describes the transformation of VEV shift, or the symmetry under which vacuum is invariant. ∼ Remaining symmetry, ∼ Breaking chain. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 37 / 44

  61. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ � � � � M † 0 0 m u In the simplest case, A = H ⊕ H , D = and M = . M 0 m d 0 Pictorially, the twist between ‘left sheet’ and ‘right sheet’. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 38 / 44

  62. Other Fun Facts – ‘local twist’ � � � � M † 0 0 m u In the simplest case, A = H ⊕ H , D = and M = . M 0 m d 0 Pictorially, the twist between ‘left sheet’ and ‘right sheet’. But even we make same twists for left and right, we still have a local ‘twist term’, unless m u = m d , isospin-like. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 38 / 44

  63. Other Fun Facts – The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 39 / 44

  64. Other Fun Facts – The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Extra dimension but discrete. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 39 / 44

  65. Other Fun Facts – The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Extra dimension but discrete. The separation introduces a second scale ∼ EW, from a i [ D , b i ] , different from the GUT scale which is led by the fluctuation in the continuous direction f i [ / ∂, g i ] . Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 39 / 44

  66. Other Fun Facts – The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Extra dimension but discrete. The separation introduces a second scale ∼ EW, from a i [ D , b i ] , different from the GUT scale which is led by the fluctuation in the continuous direction f i [ / ∂, g i ] . When the separation goes to ∞ , m f → 0 . This corresponds to the decouple of Higgs sector: left and right stop talking to each other, physically and geometrically. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 39 / 44

  67. Back to the Left-Right Completion Different realizations. For example. NCG/ spectral triple is built using lattice, supersymmetric quantum mechanics operators, Moyal deformed space, etc. We have tried a specific realization using superconnection, su (2 | 1) , and the left-right completion of su (2 | 2) . Low energy emergent left-right completion, ∼ 4 TeV . (Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, C.S., Tatsu Takeuchi: Phys. Rev. D 91 , 045020 (2015) [arXiv:1409.7574]) Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 40 / 44

  68. More About the Left-Right Completion Hints for left-right symmetry behind the scene. ( Pati-Salam Unification from NCG and the TeV-scale WR boson , [arXiv:1509.01606], Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, C.S., Tatsu Takeuchi ) Changing the algebra to ( H R ⊕ H L ) ⊗ ( C ⊕ M 3 ( C )) does not change the scale. 2 3 g 2 BL = g 2 2 L = g 2 2 R = g 2 3 . Through the mixing of SU (2) R × U (1) B − L into U (1) Y , we get g ′ 2 = 1 1 1 = 5 1 g 2 + g 2 . g 2 3 BL ∼ LR symmetry breaking at GUT. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 41 / 44

  69. Myths and Outlooks So far it is a classical theory – only classical L is given. But it has a GUT feature! Without adding new d.o.f. If it just happens at one scale, how to accommodate Wilson picture. Quantization of the theory? Loops? Relation to the D-brane structure? Measure of the Dirac operator? ... Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 42 / 44

  70. Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: ( A , H , D ) , the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = � a [ D , b ] . Spectral action, Tr ( f ( D / Λ)) ∼ DA + A 2 , as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ † D A Ψ , for the fermionic part. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 43 / 44

  71. Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: ( A , H , D ) , the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = � a [ D , b ] . Spectral action, Tr ( f ( D / Λ)) ∼ DA + A 2 , as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ † D A Ψ , for the fermionic part. The dish: Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 43 / 44

  72. Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: ( A , H , D ) , the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = � a [ D , b ] . Spectral action, Tr ( f ( D / Λ)) ∼ DA + A 2 , as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ † D A Ψ , for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 43 / 44

  73. Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: ( A , H , D ) , the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = � a [ D , b ] . Spectral action, Tr ( f ( D / Λ)) ∼ DA + A 2 , as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ † D A Ψ , for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 43 / 44

  74. Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: ( A , H , D ) , the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = � a [ D , b ] . Spectral action, Tr ( f ( D / Λ)) ∼ DA + A 2 , as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ † D A Ψ , for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets ( m f → 0 , second scale, etc.) Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 43 / 44

  75. Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: ( A , H , D ) , the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = � a [ D , b ] . Spectral action, Tr ( f ( D / Λ)) ∼ DA + A 2 , as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ † D A Ψ , for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets ( m f → 0 , second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. Chen Sun @ Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, 2015 43 / 44

Recommend

Gravity in three dimensions as a noncommutative gauge theory George Manolakos ESI workshop MM

Gravity in three dimensions as a noncommutative gauge theory George Manolakos ESI workshop MM

Gravity in three dimensions as a noncommutative gauge theory George Manolakos ESI workshop MM for NCG and string theory July 10, 2018 Joint work with: A. Chatzistavrakidis, L. Jonke, D. Jurman, P. Manousselis, G. Zoupanos NTUA

229 views • 20 slides
Prelude A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, Clifford Structures in Noncommutative Geometry The Spectral

Prelude A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, Clifford Structures in Noncommutative Geometry The Spectral

Prelude A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, Clifford Structures in Noncommutative Geometry The Spectral Action Principle , and The Standard Model of Particle Physics Commun. Math. Phys. 186 (1997), 731750. The noncommutative geometry approach to

316 views • 6 slides
Noncommutative gauge theory of generalized (quantum) Weyl algebras Tomasz Brzezi nski Swansea

Noncommutative gauge theory of generalized (quantum) Weyl algebras Tomasz Brzezi nski Swansea

Noncommutative gauge theory of generalized (quantum) Weyl algebras Tomasz Brzezi nski Swansea University & University of Biaystok WGMP XXXV, 2016 References: TB, Noncommutative differential geometry of generalized Weyl algebras , SIGMA

407 views • 37 slides
Noncommutative Geometry and Physics A. Connes 1 Variables One striking point is the role that

Noncommutative Geometry and Physics A. Connes 1 Variables One striking point is the role that

Noncommutative Geometry and Physics A. Connes 1 Variables One striking point is the role that variables play in Newtons approach, while Leibniz intro- duced the term infinitesimal but did not use variables. According to Newton

884 views • 61 slides
j =0 1 Noncommutative torus d y d x = R \ Q 1.0 C ( T 2 ) ' C ( S 1 ) o Z 0.8 0.6 V

j =0 1 Noncommutative torus d y d x = R \ Q 1.0 C ( T 2 ) ' C ( S 1 ) o Z 0.8 0.6 V

The term in the heat kernel a 4 Trace ( a exp( t )) expansion of nonccommutative tori Alain Connes and Farzad Fa ti izadeh X 0 ( a a 2 j ) t j m/ 2 j =0 1 Noncommutative torus d y d x = R \ Q 1.0 C ( T 2

368 views • 33 slides
Instantons in gauge theories with N=1/2 supersymmetry Oleg Lunin Institute for Advanced Study

Instantons in gauge theories with N=1/2 supersymmetry Oleg Lunin Institute for Advanced Study

Instantons in gauge theories with N=1/2 supersymmetry Oleg Lunin Institute for Advanced Study R. Britto, B. Feng, O. L., SJ. Rey, hep-th/0311275 Outline Noncommutative superspace. Gauge theory on NS classical aspects

363 views • 15 slides
No Translation Symmetry no Bloch Theory Here is a discussion of the various aperiodic problems

No Translation Symmetry no Bloch Theory Here is a discussion of the various aperiodic problems

NCG APPROACH TO TOPOLOGICAL INVARIANTS IN CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS: LECTURE I JEAN BELLISSARD 1. Noncommutative Geometry: an Apology 1.1. Why Do We Need Noncommutative Geometry. Why do we need such a complicate mathematical theory such as

831 views • 23 slides
Towards a Towards a Gauge Theory of Gravity Gauge Theory of Gravity Ivan Debono Fundamental

Towards a Towards a Gauge Theory of Gravity Gauge Theory of Gravity Ivan Debono Fundamental

Towards a Towards a Gauge Theory of Gravity Gauge Theory of Gravity Ivan Debono Fundamental Interactions All physical interactions in nature described by 4 fundamental forces: Gravity Electromagnetism Weak nuclear force

390 views • 20 slides
Algebras of observables: a gauge theory example Owen Gwilliam Max Planck Institut f ur

Algebras of observables: a gauge theory example Owen Gwilliam Max Planck Institut f ur

Algebras of observables: a gauge theory example Owen Gwilliam Max Planck Institut f ur Mathematik, Bonn 9 December 2017 Owen Gwilliam Algebras of observables: a gauge theory example A basic challenge with gauge theory The usual kinematics

434 views • 28 slides
Multiplicative Invariant Theory Workshop Noncommutative Invariant Theory U Washington,

Multiplicative Invariant Theory Workshop Noncommutative Invariant Theory U Washington,

Multiplicative Invariant Theory Workshop Noncommutative Invariant Theory U Washington, Seattle 05/27/2012 Jessie Hamm Temple University, Philadelphia Special Thanks to Dr. Martin Lorenz Overview Part I: Introduction Part II: Regularity

963 views • 68 slides
SU(2) with six flavors A new kind of gauge theory George T. Fleming (Yale) for the LSD

SU(2) with six flavors A new kind of gauge theory George T. Fleming (Yale) for the LSD

SU(2) with six flavors A new kind of gauge theory George T. Fleming (Yale) for the LSD Collaboration Two-Color Gauge Theories Perturbatively, SU(2) gauge theories behave like any other SU(N c ) gauge theory. Non-perturbatively, SU(2)

384 views • 16 slides
Noncommutative Potential Theory 3 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

Noncommutative Potential Theory 3 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

Overview Carr du champ Dirac operator in DS Spectral triple, Fredholm module of D S NC Potential Theory Lipschiz and multipliers seminorms Noncommutative Potential Theory 3 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di Milano

492 views • 24 slides
Fate of a recent conformal fixed point and -function in the SU (3) BSM gauge theory with ten

Fate of a recent conformal fixed point and -function in the SU (3) BSM gauge theory with ten

Fate of a recent conformal fixed point and -function in the SU (3) BSM gauge theory with ten massless flavors Daniel Nogradi in collaboration with Zoltan Fodor, Kieran Holland Julius Kuti, Chik Him Wong What, why and how? SU (3) gauge

476 views • 43 slides
Insightful D-branes Albion Lawrence Brandeis University 1 Outline I. Introduction II. A

Insightful D-branes Albion Lawrence Brandeis University 1 Outline I. Introduction II. A

Insightful D-branes Albion Lawrence Brandeis University 1 Outline I. Introduction II. A singularity with a gauge theory dual III. Gauge theory vs. spacetime coordinate transformations IV. Gauge theory dynamics and hyperbolic black holes V.

478 views • 33 slides
Gauge&theory&of&states&of&matter& /&old&and&new&

Gauge&theory&of&states&of&matter& /&old&and&new&

Gauge&theory&of&states&of&matter& /&old&and&new& Jrg%Frhlich% Em.,%ETH%Zurich% Vienna,%Sept.%2014% Dedicated%to%the%memory%of% Edward&Nelson % Credits(

848 views • 20 slides
Discrete Gauge Symmetry and Aharonov-Bohm Radiation in String Theory Yutaka Ookouchi (Kyushu U.)

Discrete Gauge Symmetry and Aharonov-Bohm Radiation in String Theory Yutaka Ookouchi (Kyushu U.)

Discrete Gauge Symmetry and Aharonov-Bohm Radiation in String Theory Yutaka Ookouchi (Kyushu U.) 1310.4026 [hep-th], Published in JHEP String theory Aharonov-Bohm effect Discrete Gauge Theory Discrete gauge sym. is ubiquitous Consider

553 views • 22 slides
On gauge theory phase diagrams at zero and finite temperature K. Tuominen University of

On gauge theory phase diagrams at zero and finite temperature K. Tuominen University of

On gauge theory phase diagrams at zero and finite temperature K. Tuominen University of Jyvskyl & Helsinki Institute of Physics SCGT 2012, Nagoya. Outline: SU( N c ) gauge + fund rep. matter x f x f N f H L N c 7 6 1.

794 views • 58 slides
Noncommutative Potential Theory 1 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

Noncommutative Potential Theory 1 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

Overview Classical Potential Theory Dirichlet forms on von Neumann algebras KMS-symmetry Quantum Spins Compact Quantum Groups Lvy Process HAP Noncommutative Potential Theory 1 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

625 views • 29 slides
Supergravity Gravity: on-shell Einstein gravity gauge theory of local Lorentz/translation

Supergravity Gravity: on-shell Einstein gravity gauge theory of local Lorentz/translation

Supergravity Gravity: on-shell Einstein gravity gauge theory of local Lorentz/translation symmetry generators M ab , P a gauge fields ab , spin connection, e a vierbein where a, b = 0 , . . . , 3 are Lorentz gauge group

408 views • 39 slides
Degree bounds and rationality of Hilbert series in noncommutative invariant theory M aty as

Degree bounds and rationality of Hilbert series in noncommutative invariant theory M aty as

Degree bounds and rationality of Hilbert series in noncommutative invariant theory M aty as Domokos (based on joint work with Vesselin Drensky) MTA R enyi Institute of Mathematics Budapest, Hungary June, 2017

632 views • 16 slides
Noncommutative Geometry and Potential Theory on the Sierpinski Gasket Fabio Cipriani

Noncommutative Geometry and Potential Theory on the Sierpinski Gasket Fabio Cipriani

Overview Sierpinski gasket Dirichlet form Differential calculus Fredholm modules, Conformal Geometry Dirac operators, Spectral triples Potential Theory Noncommutative Geometry and Potential Theory on the Sierpinski Gasket Fabio Cipriani

1.08k views • 34 slides
Noncommutative Potential Theory 4 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

Noncommutative Potential Theory 4 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di

Overview Sierpinski gasket Differential calculus on Sierpinski gasket Dirac operator and Spectral triple Potential Theory Noncommutative Potential Theory 4 Fabio Cipriani Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di Milano joint works

499 views • 29 slides
Abstract and Outline We are investigating the dynamics of a new Poincar e gauge theory of

Abstract and Outline We are investigating the dynamics of a new Poincar e gauge theory of

Poincar e Gauge Theory with Coupled Even and Odd Parity Dynamic Spin- 0 Modes: Dynamical Isotropic Bianchi Cosmologies Fei-hung Ho Department of Physics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan Taiwan Work with James M. Nester 2012-03-01 @YITP

612 views • 29 slides
Seiberg-Witten Theory and AGT Relation Tohru Eguchi We consider N = 2 supersymmetric gauge

Seiberg-Witten Theory and AGT Relation Tohru Eguchi We consider N = 2 supersymmetric gauge

Seiberg-Witten Theory and AGT Relation Tohru Eguchi We consider N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories in 4- dimensions and study the case when the theory possesses the conformal invariance. Simplest example of a conformal invariant theory:

904 views • 38 slides

More recommend