RESULTS English Language Arts (ELA) … Mathematics … Science Measuring College and Career Readiness TOMS RIVER REGIONAL SCHOOLS October 10, 2018 1
Reference Points For Tonight’s Discussion Measurement and Progress Increasing Instructional Capacity Resources for Parents 2
Measurement and Progress How are we doing compared to the State and our District? 3
PARCC (ELA and Mathematics) PERFORMANCE LEVELS Score Range 650-850 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations (650-699) Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations (700-724) Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations (725-749) Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations (750- varies) Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations (varies – 850) 4
Elementary Grades 3, 4, 5 5
PARCC Elementary ELA District Trend Lines 100% 80% 60% 58% 57% 52% 53% Grade 3 51% 51% 50% Grade 4 48% Grade 5 47% 40% 20% 0% 6 2016 2017 2018
PARCC Elementary ELA District 100% 2016 2017 80% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 2018 58% 58% 58% 60% 54% 53% 57% 53% 59% 52% 52% 51% 50% 56% 48% 47% 51% 50% 47% 40% 20% 0% State District State District State District 7
PARCC Elementary ELA Subgroups 100% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 80% 76% 73% 73% 63% 57% 60% 55% 47% 2016 2017 87% 40% 40% 40% 81% 40% 2018 35% 34% 33% 32% 65% 61% 26% 57% 52% 22% 18% 20% 17% 40% 39% 35% 32% 32% 32% 31% 30% 28% 20% 19% 18% 36% 68% 32% 52% 31% 22% 36% 70% 21% 55% 33% 20% 31% 70% 38% 57% 32% 15% 0% 8
PARCC Elementary Math District Trend Lines 100% 80% 60% 55% Grade 3 50% 48% 51% 49% 48% 48% Grade 4 44% 44% Grade 5 40% 20% 0% 9 2016 2017 2018
PARCC Elementary Math District 2016 100% 2017 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 2018 80% 60% 53% 53% 50% 50% 49% 55% 48% 48% 48% 48% 46% 52% 51% 44% 44% 48% 47% 46% 40% 20% 0% State District State District State District 10
PARCC Elementary Math Subgroups 100% Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 3 78% 80% 74% 63% 60% 54% 53% 48% 2016 2017 38% 40% 76% 2018 74% 72% 31% 29% 29% 29% 28% 28% 55% 54% 22% 22% 21% 48% 20% 17% 17% 33% 31% 31% 31% 29% 28% 25% 25% 24% 23% 23% 19% 40% 79% 36% 61% 39% 31% 30% 79% 27% 55% 33% 25% 27% 64% 38% 53% 30% 17% 0% 11
Middle School Grades 6, 7, 8 12
PARCC Middle School ELA District Trend Lines 100% 80% 59% 61% 60% 56% 58% 55% 54% Grade 6 53% 53% Grade 7 44% Grade 8 40% 20% 0% 2016 2017 2018 13
PARCC Middle School ELA District 100% Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 80% 63% 61% 60% 58% 57% 60% 56% 56% 56% 53% 54% 59% 59% 59% 52% 55% 2016 53% 53% 44% 2017 40% 2018 20% 0% State District State District State District 14
PARCC Middle School ELA Subgroups 100% Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 87% 82% 80% 74% 66% 61% 58% 60% 49% 48% 2016 42% 2017 89% 41% 40% 39% 40% 37% 79% 2018 77% 35% 30% 62% 58% 58% 49% 48% 45% 41% 41% 20% 17% 40% 35% 34% 14% 13% 30% 19% 13% 10% 42% 86% 43% 58% 34% 12% 39% 77% 23% 56% 36% 13% 34% 65% 31% 46% 26% 10% 0% 15
PARCC Middle School Math District Trend Lines 100% 80% 60% Grade 6 Grade 7 39% Grade 8 40% 36% 34% 35% 31% 28% 20% 20% 17% 14% 0% 2016 2017 2018 16
PARCC Middle School Math District 100% 80% Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 60% 2016 2017 44% 43% 43% 2018 39% 38% 44% 40% 35% 34% 40% 36% 28% 28% 26% 31% 28% 20% 17% 20% 14% 0% State District State District State District 17
PARCC Middle School Math Subgroups 100% Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 80% 69% 60% 51% 2016 2017 41% 38% 40% 37% 2018 64% 57% 21% 20% 19% 18% 18% 41% 20% 17% 16% 15% 14% 33% 28% 9% 9% 22% 20% 18% 6% 17% 17% 3% 16% 16% 12% 11% 3% 8% 7% 26% 63% 24% 42% 21% 13% 5% 12% 65% 10% 30% 13% 4% 15% 54% 13% 17% 13% 6% 0% 18
High School Grades 9, 10, 11 19
PARCC High School ELA District Trend Lines 100% 80% 60% Grade 9 54% 52% 52% 51% 50% 48% Grade 10 46% 43% Grade 11 40% 39% 20% 0% 2016 2017 2018 20
PARCC High School ELA District 100% 80% Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 60% 54% 54% 52% 52% 2016 51% 51% 50% 50% 48% 48% 46% 2017 45% 43% 43% 2018 38% 39% 39% 40% 37% 20% 0% State District State District State District 21
PARCC High School ELA Subgroups 100% Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 78% 80% 71% 66% 60% 57% 55% 2016 2017 41% 41% 39% 40% 37% 2018 35% 33% 32% 69% 68% 30% 29% 64% 56% 51% 46% 20% 38% 16% 15% 33% 33% 32% 30% 30% 30% 11% 9% 23% 23% 12% 10% 7% 31% 74% 18% 49% 28% 8% 37% 72% 21% 52% 38% 12% 40% 79% 25% 54% 39% 15% 0% 22
PARCC High School Math District Trend Lines 100% 80% 60% Algebra I Algebra II 40% Geometry 38% 35% 32% 24% 24% 23% 21% 20% 19% 18% 0% 2016 2017 2018 23
PARCC High School Math District 100% 80% Algebra I Algebra II Geometry 60% 45% 42% 2016 41% 2017 38% 40% 35% 2018 32% 30% 30% 29% 27% 27% 24% 25% 24% 23% 21% 19% 18% 20% 0% State District State District State District 24
PARCC High School Math Subgroups 100% Algebra I Algebra II Geometry 80% 67% 60% 2016 46% 44% 42% 2017 40% 2018 68% 22% 22% 21% 19% 20% 16% 36% 35% 35% 13% 11% 28% 10% 24% 5% 20% 7% 7% 2% 6% 16% 7% 14% 14% 13% 3% 2% 12% 12% 4% 11% 18% 59% 8% 38% 17% 9% 4% 8% 51% 6% 18% 10% 3% 13% 40% 6% 26% 13% 4% 0% 25
Science (Under Construction) NJSLA-Science ▪ New Jersey Student Learning Assessment – Science ▪ Grades 5, 8 and 11 ▪ Next Generation Science Standards ▪ Computer Based Test Pilot Year ▪ No data will be generated to districts 26
Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) Alternate assessment for students with the most significant intellectual disabilities ELA and Math Grades 3-8 and 11 Science Grades 5, 8, and 11 Performance Levels Emerging Approaching Target At Target Advanced 2017 … 132 students 2018 … 138 students 27
Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) 100% ELA ELA 85% 78% 80% 73% 68% 63% 61% 60% 57% 56% 54% 53% 52% 48% 2017 47% 2018 40% 36% 20% 0% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 28
Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) 100% Mathematics 80% 74% 64% 64% 62% 60% 2017 46% 2018 38% 40% 40% 35% 33% 33% 32% 32% 22% 20% 12% 0% 29 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11
Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) Science 100% 80% 60% 50% 2018 40% 33% 21% 20% 0% Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11 30
Access for ELLs ESSA Accountability Profile Administered annually K-12 Monitors student progress in learning academic English Overall Score (Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing) Performance Levels ▪ 1-Entering ▪ 2-Emerging ▪ 3-Developing ▪ 4-Expanding ▪ 5-Bridging ▪ 6-Reaching 2017 … 189 students 2018 … 243 students 31
ACCESS for ELLs 100% 80% 60% 2017 2018 40% 31% 27% 23% 43% 20% 16% 24% 18% 14% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% Entering Emerging Developing Expanding Bridging Reaching 32
Increasing Instructional Capacity How do we use data to plan for instructional shifts and supports to increase student growth? 33
Data Cycle 34
Data Sources District level data School/Grade level data Disaggregated data by subgroups Disaggregated data by categories (i.e., standards,strands,clusters) Evidence Statements Item analysis Student-level analysis Benchmark assessments Quarterly assessments Reading levels Report Card Grades Student Attendance PSAT, SAT, AP Course Rigor Student Discipline ● PERFORMANCE MATTERS – data warehouse 35
Data Team Elementary Staff Teams Middle School District Team Staff Teams High School Staff Teams Analysis of multi-year trends, grade levels, content areas, subgroups, student growth 36
Analysis Identify strengths and gaps with curriculum and instruction Inform the conversations of our educators Consideration for resources necessary to meet the learning needs of all students Determine program and professional development needs 37
Next Steps … Implementation Grades K-5 ELLs K-12 ▪ New Math program adoption ▪ Sheltered English Instruction ▪ Ready Math ▪ Collaborative Teaching – Walnut Street ▪ I Ready Diagnostics ▪ Technology Initiative I Ready Diagnostics ELA ▪ Translation, Visual and Video ▪ Standards based report cards supports Grades 6-12 Special Education ▪ Achieve 3000 ELA Level setting for all ▪ Creative Curriculum (Pre School) students (6-8) ▪ Tiered Autism Programs ▪ Implementation of Achieve 3000 Science articles (6-8) Social Emotional Learning (SEL) K-12 ▪ I Ready Math Diagnostics for all students ▪ Engaging the Whole Child (6-8) Performance Matters K-12 ▪ Freshman Academy Data Analysis PLC ▪ Increased implementation of cross curricular projects (6-12) 38
Recommend
More recommend
