MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 2

Introduction Measurement Results Simulation Results Conclusion 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 3

Introduction 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 4

The Story so far • Amplitude Detuning present in flat orbit measurements during commissioning 2016. • Corrected octuploes in the IRs for commissioning 2017. • Amplitude Detuning present during commissioning 2018 when crossing scheme applied. • MD3311 (June 2018) • Investigation of different error sources via simulations (Now) 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 5

Simulation Parameters • Replicating IP5 crossing as close to MD3311 as possible • 160 ➭ rad X’ing angle • .55 mm Separation • -1.8 mm Offset • IP1 crossing same as IP5 but without offset. • Setting A5, A6, B4, B5, B6 errors separately and A5,A6,B5,B6 together. • WISE error models, averaged over 60 seeds. • Calculating detuning values via PTC at different stages: • nominal: Without any errors • errors arc: Applied errors in the arcs ( M[B,Q] ) • errors mqx: + errors in the MQX ( MQX ) • errors mb ip: + errors in the MB of the IP ( MB[XW,RC,X,RB,RS,W] ) • errors all: + remaining MQ-errors ( MQ[Y,M,MC,ML,TL,W] ) • corrected: After Triplet and D1,D2 Correction (via MQX, MBX, MBRC) 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 6

Measurement Results 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 7

Measurements Beam 1 0.0016 ± 0.0011 B1 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0103 ± 0.0009 B1 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.1122 ± 0.0113 B1 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0088 ± 0.0151 B1 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0646 ± 0.0024 B1 H-Kicks Full X'ing 0.0065 ± 0.0025 B1 H-Kicks Full X'ing 3 3 ×10 ×10 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 0.0081 ± 0.0278 B1 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0062 ± 0.0028 B1 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.1081 ± 0.0236 B1 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0060 ± 0.0031 B1 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing ×10 3 ×10 3 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 • Strong detuning in ∂ Q x ∂ 2 J x with IP5 crossing, less with full. • Small/No detuning in ∂ Q y • Crossterms not quite clear. ∂ 2 J y . 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 8

Measurements Beam 2 0.0149 ± 0.0011 B2 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0076 ± 0.0025 B2 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0032 ± 0.0010 B2 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0041 ± 0.0014 B2 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing ×10 3 ×10 3 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 0.0024 ± 0.0012 B2 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0124 ± 0.0015 B2 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0038 ± 0.0026 B2 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0252 ± 0.0024 B2 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing ×10 3 ×10 3 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 • X’ing On: Small detuning in ∂ Q y ∂ 2 J y ∂ 2 J x , positive in ∂ Q y • X’ing Off: Small detunings; negative in ∂ Q x ∂ 2 J y . 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 9

Simulation Results 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 10

A5 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 20000 10000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 0 10000 20000 l c x p l d l c x p l d l c x p l d a r q l a r q i a l e a r q i a l e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r o r r o r r o e e r o e c e r o e c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 20000 10000 Beam 2 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 0 10000 20000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t m b s t i s i s m i s m c m s m r c m s m r c r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 11

A6 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 30000 20000 10000 0 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 30000 20000 10000 Beam 2 0 ANHX0100 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 12

B4 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 150000 100000 50000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 0 50000 100000 150000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 150000 100000 Beam 2 50000 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 0 50000 100000 150000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 13

B5 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 60000 40000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 20000 0 20000 40000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 60000 40000 Beam 2 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 20000 0 20000 40000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 14

B6 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 60000 40000 20000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 60000 40000 20000 Beam 2 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 15

MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 2 Introduction Measurement Results Simulation Results Conclusion 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 3 Introduction 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 4

Grid simulation (AliEn) Outline GRID simulation Simulation tool Ptolemy (Berkeley)

A case study of implementing simulation results in emergency stroke care Dr Thomas Monks

Outline Kln test simulation Full simulation of the test experiment with the symmetric

Outline Narcisse Ngada DESY, MKK 1) What is simulation ? 14.05.2014 2) Why simulation ? 3)

RPC Simulation Vincent Franais 3 fvrier 2016 Vincent Franais (LPC) RPC Simulation 3

UMBC A B M A L T F O U M B C I M Y O R T 1 (10/2/07) I E S R C E O V U

PROTO60 - First Simulation Results Position Reconstruction Daniel Bremer , Peter Drexler, Tobias

Robotic Deformable Object Cutting From Simulation to Experimentation Philip Long, Wisama Khalil

Using Erlang for Distributed Simulation for the Derivation of Fault Tolerance Measures Nils M

Why Bayesian methods in Simulation? Simulation Simulation Model Inputs BAYESIAN IDEAS

Turbo Receiver Design for MIMO Relay ARQ Transmissions Halim Yanikomeroglu Carleton University,

The Modelling and Simulation Process 1. History of Modelling and Simulation 2. Modelling and

1 7 8 Types of simulation models Dynamic simulation models Stochastic vs. deterministic.

1 Simple example of simulation Slide 4 Evaluation of expected value of production E(V)

Introduction to Simulation Introduction to Simulation Gambling Game Reading: Law, Sections 1.1,

Simulation Simulation CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO SIMULATION 2 MODELING CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

N-Body Simulation Devanshu Mukherjee Munish Mehra What is N-body Simulation? Simulation of a

LABOUR FORCE MODELING BASED ON AGENT-BASED SIMULATION Mustafa DN Ph.D., Rtd. Captain (N)

High pressure gas TPC simulation George Christodoulou DUNE ND Meeting 22/10/2015 Overview

Introducing results from micro-simulation models on shared mobilityfor cities (Helsinki,

Climate Change, Conflict, and Migration: Evidence and Simulation results for MENA migration

Stress simulation on a round wheel W target S. Jin 1 , P. Sievers 2 , T. Omori 3 , J.Gao 1 1 IHEP;

Flow of Granular Particles on an Inclined plane in LIGGGHTS EN 649 Mohit Prateek Roll No.

Introduction to Simulation Reading: Law, Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.8 Peter J. Haas CS 590M: