results and discussion
play

Results and Discussion Conclusions (Image adapted from Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

September 16, 2016 K. H. Kang * , H. G. Kim ** , T. J. Park * and I. G. Byun * * Institute for Environmental Technology and Industry, Pusan National University ** School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University Backgrounds


  1. September 16, 2016 K. H. Kang * , H. G. Kim ** , T. J. Park * and I. G. Byun * * Institute for Environmental Technology and Industry, Pusan National University ** School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University

  2. Backgrounds Objective Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions

  3. (Image adapted from Plan Washington.org ).

  4. Zeolite Limestone Steel slag Dolomite

  5. Ca 2+ + PO 4 3- 3- 3- PO 4 PO 4 3 PO 4 3- - PO 4 Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ↓ 3- 3 PO 4 PO 4 - 3- PO 4 pH ↑ Ca 2+ Ca 2+ Ca 2+ Ca 2+ Ca 2+ Ca 2+

  6. Table 1. Chemical composition of the steel slag (Lee and Jang , 2004) Composit itio ion Conte ntent (%) (%) CaO aO 40.1 SiO 2 14.4 Fe 2 O 3 10.8 MgO 7.2 MnO 3.1 Al 2 O 3 2.1 TiO 2 0.8

  7. Table 2. Conditions for batch operation Table 3. Parameters for PO 4 -P removal Value Val Par arameters rs Val Value Working vol. 300 mL pH 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 25 ℃ Temperature PO 4 -P conc. 25, 125 and 250 (mg/L) Agitation speed 120 rpm Amt. of slag (g) 25, 50, 100 and 150 g Period 4 d

  8. Fig. 1. pH variations of distilled water by steel slag according to the elution time.

  9. Fig. 2. Comparison of the pH change between distilled water and K 2 HPO 4 solution with steel slag according to the elution time.

  10. (A) (B) Fig. 3. SEM images of the uncoated (A) and CNT-coated (B) steel slag.

  11. Fig. 4. Changes in the PO 4 -P concentration and pH in the K 2 HPO 4 solution with CNT-coated slag and uncoated slag.

  12. Table 4. PO 4 -P removal efficiency according to input CNT-coated stell slag for 12 and 24 h PO PO 4 -P rem emova val CNT NT- effic iciency (%) (%) coat coated Fi Final l st steel l pH pH slag sl ag (g) (g) 12 12 h 24 24 h 25 9.0 37.1 67.4 50 8.8 50.3 84.7 100 9.4 80.1 97.2 Fig. 5. Kinetics of the PO 4 -P concentration at different 150 9.5 98.2 99.5 amount of CNT-coated steel slag (C 0 = 250 mg PO 4 -P/L).

  13. Fig. 6. Kinetics of the PO 4 -P concentration and changes in pH at various initial PO 4 -P concentration (CNT- coated steel slag input = 50 g).

  14. Fig. 7. Relationship between ln X and ln C e based Fig. 8. Relationship between 1/X and 1/C e based on the Freundlich isotherm equation for CNT- on the Langmuir isotherm equation for CNT- coated steel slag at 25 ℃ . coated steel slag at 25 ℃ .

  15. Table 5. Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm constant of Table 6. Comparison of K value between CNT- CNT-coated steel slag coated steel slag and other materials Fre reundlic ich isot otherm Lang angmuir ir isot otherm rm Abso bsorbent K K (m (mg/ g/g) Reference Ref consta con tant con consta tant Tang et al., Shale 69.2 K (mg/g) 421.6 a (mg/g) 1250 2009 Tang et al., 1/n 0.33 b (mg/g) 0.47 Ironstone 29.7 2009 R 2 0.97 R 2 0.84 Kim et al., EAF-slag 29.3 2010 CN CNT- coa coated stee eel 421 421.6 This This stud udy slag

Recommend


More recommend