residence time distributions as a measure for stochastic
play

Residence-time distributions as a measure for stochastic resonance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

W eierstra-Institut fr Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik Period of Concentration: Stochastic Climate Models MPI Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, 23 May 1 June 2005 Barbara Gentz Residence-time distributions as a measure for


  1. W eierstraß-Institut für Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik Period of Concentration: Stochastic Climate Models MPI Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, 23 May – 1 June 2005 Barbara Gentz Residence-time distributions as a measure for stochastic resonance WIAS Berlin, Germany gentz@wias-berlin.de www.wias-berlin.de/people/gentz

  2. Outline ⊲ A brief introduction to stochastic resonance – Example: Dansgaard–Oeschger events ⊲ First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR ⊲ Diffusion exit from a domain – Exponential asymptotics: Wentzell–Freidlin theory ⊲ Noise-induced passage through an unstable periodic orbit ⊲ The first-passage time density – Universality – Plots of the density: Cycling and synchronisation ⊲ The residence-time density – Definition and computation – Plots of the density Joint work with Nils Berglund (CPT–CNRS, Marseille) Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 1 (24)

  3. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance What is stochastic resonance (SR)? SR = mechanism to amplify weak signals in presence of noise Requirements ⊲ (background) noise ⊲ weak input ⊲ characteristic barrier or threshold (nonlinear system) Examples ⊲ periodic occurrence of ice ages (?) ⊲ Dansgaard–Oeschger events (?) ⊲ bidirectional ring lasers ⊲ visual and auditory perception ⊲ receptor cells in crayfish ⊲ . . . Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 2 (24)

  4. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Example: Dansgaard–Oeschger events GISP2 climate record for the second half of the last glacial [from: Rahmstorf, Timing of abrupt climate change: A precise clock , Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (2003)] ⊲ Abrupt, large-amplitude shifts in global climate during last glacial ⊲ Cold stadials; warm Dansgaard–Oeschger interstadials ⊲ Rapid warming; slower return to cold stadial ⊲ 1 470-year cycle? ⊲ Occasionally a cycle is skipped Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 3 (24)

  5. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Figure 2. Nils Berglu n d an d Barbara Gen tz Metastability in simple climate mo dels: Pathwise analysis of slow ly driven L angevin e quations The paradigm Overdamped motion of a Brownian particle . . . � � − x 3 d x t = t + x t + A cos( εt ) d t + σ d W t � �� � = − ∂ ∂xV ( x t , εt ) . . . in a periodically modulated double-well potential V ( x, s ) = 1 4 x 4 − 1 2 x 2 − A cos( s ) x , A < A c 2 Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 4 (24)

  6. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Sample paths A = 0 . 00 , σ = 0 . 30 , ε = 0 . 001 A = 0 . 10 , σ = 0 . 27 , ε = 0 . 001 A = 0 . 24 , σ = 0 . 20 , ε = 0 . 001 A = 0 . 35 , σ = 0 . 20 , ε = 0 . 001 Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 5 (24)

  7. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Different parameter regimes Synchronisation I ⊲ For matching time scales: 2 π/ε = T forcing = 2 T Kramers ≍ e 2 H/σ 2 ⊲ Quasistatic approach: Transitions twice per period with high probability (physics’ literature; [Freidlin ’00], [Imkeller et al , since ’02]) ⊲ Requires exponentially long forcing periods Synchronisation II ⊲ For intermediate forcing periods: T relax ≪ T forcing ≪ T Kramers and close-to-critical forcing amplitude: A ≈ A c ⊲ Transitions twice per period with high probability ⊲ Subtle dynamical effects: Effective barrier heights [Berglund & G ’02] SR outside synchronisation regimes ⊲ Only occasional transitions ⊲ But transition times localised within forcing periods Unified description / understanding of transition between regimes ? Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 6 (24)

  8. First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR Qualitative measures for SR How to measure combined effect of periodic and random perturbations? Spectral-theoretic approach Probabilistic approach ⊲ Power spectrum ⊲ Distribution of interspike times ⊲ Spectral power amplification ⊲ Distribution of first-passage times ⊲ Signal-to-noise ratio ⊲ Distribution of residence times Look for periodic component in density of these distributions Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 7 (24)

  9. First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR Interspike times for Dansgaard–Oeschger events Histogram for “waiting times” [from: Alley, Anandakrishnan, Jung, Stochastic resonance in the North Atlantic , Paleoceanography 16 (2001)] Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 8 (24)

  10. First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR Interwell transitions Deterministic motion in a periodically modulated double-well potential ⊲ 2 stable periodic orbits tracking bottoms of wells ⊲ 1 unstable periodic orbit tracking saddle ⊲ Unstable periodic orbit separates basins of attraction Brownian particle in a periodically modulated double-well potential ⊲ Interwell transitions characterised by crossing of unstable orbit x well saddle t periodic orbit well Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 9 (24)

  11. x Diffusion exit from a domain � D Exit problem x 0 x det = f ( x det x 0 ∈ R d Deterministic ODE ˙ t ) t Small random perturbation d x t = f ( x t ) d t + σ d W t D (same initial cond. x 0 ) Bounded domain D ∋ x 0 (with smooth boundary) τ = τ D = inf { t > 0: x t �∈ D} ⊲ first-exit time ⊲ first-exit location x τ ∈ ∂ D Distribution of τ and x τ ? Interesting case D positively invariant under deterministic flow Approaches ⊲ Mean first-exit times and locations via PDEs ⊲ Exponential asymptotics via Wentzell–Freidlin theory Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 10 (24) 1

  12. Diffusion exit from a domain Exponential asymptotics: Wentzell–Freidlin theory I Assumptions (for this slide) ⊲ D positively invariant ⊲ unique, asympt. stable equilibrium point at 0 ∈ D ⊲ ∂ D ⊂ basin of attraction of 0 Concepts ⊲ Rate function / action functional : � t I [0 ,t ] ( ϕ ) = 1 ϕ s − f ( ϕ s ) � 2 d s for ϕ ∈ H 1 , � ˙ I [0 ,t ] ( ϕ ) = + ∞ otherwise 2 0 Probability ∼ exp {− I ( ϕ ) } to observe sample paths close to ϕ (LDP) ⊲ Quasipotential: Cost to go against the flow from 0 to z t> 0 inf { I [0 ,t ] ( ϕ ): ϕ ∈ C ([0 , t ] , R d ) , ϕ 0 = 0 , ϕ t = z } V (0 , z ) = inf ⊲ Minimum of quasipotential on boundary ∂ D : V := min z ∈ ∂ D V (0 , z ) Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 11 (24)

  13. Diffusion exit from a domain Exponential asymptotics: Wentzell–Freidlin theory II Theorem [Wentzell & Freidlin � ’70] For arbitrary initial condition in D ⊲ Mean first-exit time E τ ∼ e V /σ 2 as σ → 0 ⊲ Concentration of first-exit times � e ( V − δ ) /σ 2 � τ � e ( V + δ ) /σ 2 � → 1 as σ → 0 P (for arbitrary δ > 0 ) ⊲ Concentration of exit locations near minima of quasipotential Gradient case (reversible diffusion) Drift coefficient deriving from potential: f = −∇ V ⊲ Cost for leaving potential well: V = 2 H H ⊲ Attained for paths going against the flow: ϕ t = − f ( ϕ t ) ˙ Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 12 (24)

  14. Diffusion exit from a domain z Refined results in the gradient case x 1 Simplest case: V double-well potential x 0 First-hitting time τ hit of deeper well ⊲ E x 1 τ hit = c ( σ ) e 2 [ V ( z ) − V ( x 1 )] / σ 2 � | det ∇ 2 V ( z ) | 2 π ⊲ lim σ → 0 c ( σ ) = exists ! det ∇ 2 V ( x 1 ) λ 1 ( z ) λ 1 ( z ) unique negative e.v. of ∇ 2 V ( z ) (Physics’ literature: [Eyring ’35], [Kramers ’40]; [Bovier, Gayrard, Eckhoff, Klein ’02]) ⊲ Subexponential asymptotics known ! Related to geometry at well and saddle / small eigenvalues of the generator ([Bovier et al ’02], [Helffer, Klein, Nier ’04]) � τ hit > t E τ hit � ⊲ τ hit ≈ exp. distributed: lim = e − t 1 σ → 0 P ([Day ’82], [Bovier et al ’02]) Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 13 (24)

  15. Noise-induced passage through an unstable periodic orbit New phenomena for drift not deriving from a potential? Simplest situation of interest Nontrivial invariant set which is a single periodic orbit Assume from now on d = 2 , ∂ D = unstable periodic orbit ⊲ E τ ∼ e V /σ 2 still holds [Day ’90] ⊲ Quasipotential V (0 , z ) ≡ V is constant on ∂ D : Exit equally likely anywhere on ∂ D (on exp. scale) ⊲ Phenomenon of cycling [Day ’92] : Distribution of x τ on ∂ D generally does not converge as σ → 0 . Density is translated along ∂ D proportionally to | log σ | . ⊲ In stationary regime : (obtained by reinjecting particle) d � � x t ∈ D has | log σ | -periodic prefactor [Maier & Stein ’96] Rate of escape d t P Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 14 (24)

  16. Noise-induced passage through an unstable periodic orbit Back to SR d x t = − ∂ ∂xV ( x t , εt ) d t + σ d W t where V ( x, s ) is a periodically modulated double-well potential V ( x, s ) = 1 4 x 4 − 1 2 x 2 − A cos( s ) x , A < A c ⊲ Time t as auxiliary variable → 2-dimensional system ⊲ Deterministic system: 3 periodic orbits tracking bottoms of wells and saddle ⊲ 2 stable, 1 unstable ⊲ Unstable periodic orbit separates basins of attraction ⊲ Choose D as interior of unstable periodic orbit ⊲ ∂ D is unstable periodic orbit Degenerate case: No noise acting on auxiliary variable Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 15 (24)

Recommend


More recommend