regional and continental quality assurance initiatives an
play

Regional and Continental Quality Assurance Initiatives: An African - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2020 CHEA International Quality Group Annual Meeting 29-30 January 2020, Washington DC Higher Education, Quality Assurance and Growing Regionalization Trends Regional and Continental Quality Assurance Initiatives: An African Perspective Goolam


  1. 2020 CHEA International Quality Group Annual Meeting 29-30 January 2020, Washington DC Higher Education, Quality Assurance and Growing Regionalization Trends Regional and Continental Quality Assurance Initiatives: An African Perspective Goolam Mohamedbhai Former Vice-Chancellor, University of Mauritius Former Secretary-General, Association of African Universities

  2. Why Poor Quality of HE in Africa?  Institutional massification – far greater student enrolment than carrying capacity of institutions  Decreasing quality of output from secondary schools  Increase in funds to public HEIs not commensurate with enrolment  Shortage of faculty, especially well-qualified ones  Poor research output  Lack of relevance of programmes – poor linkages with productive sector and community  Large number of private & CBHE institutions – many of dubious quality  Poor governance & efficiency in management of HEIs

  3. Evidence of Poor Quality  Overcrowded lecture rooms, crumbling infrastructure, lack of labs & equipment  Large drop-out and failure rates in degree courses  Poorly trained graduates, e.g. 2014 survey of employers in 5 East African countries found 51- 62% of graduates ‘half - baked’  Increasing unemployment of graduates, e.g. 2011 survey of 1,000 graduates in South Africa showed 30% of them unemployed  Non-accreditation of programs, e.g. in 2010 NUC of Nigeria withdrew accreditation of academic depts. in over 20 Nigerian universities – lack of infrastructure and academic staff  Non-recognition of professional quals e.g. in 2011 Engg Reg Board of Kenya refused recognition of engg degrees from 3 leading public universities

  4. Agenda for Improving Quality  Control student enrolment & ensure success  Generate alternate sources of funding – cost-sharing  Upgrade qualifications of existing academic staff – both in research (PhD) & Teaching & Learning (Pedagogical Training)  Undertake more postgraduate training & research, especially in S&T  Have greater linkages with productive sectors & improve employability of students  Improve governance & efficiency in management of HEIs  Wider use of ICT in T&L, research, administration, data collection & analysis, etc.  Promote Quality Assurance within institutions (IQA) and externally by creating QA agencies (EQA)  Promote regional collaboration for sharing experiences/resources

  5. National QA Initiatives  End 20 th century several HEIs e.g. U of Mauritius , St Mary’s Uni College, Ethiopia, U of Dar es Salaam, introduced QA at institutional level through collaboration with European universities  c. 2001: South Africa’s Council for Higher Education was first to introduce national QA processes through its HEQC  In several of African countries a QA unit/section under the Commission or Council for HE undertakes this function (Nigeria, Kenya, Mauritius, Ghana); in some countries Quality is assured by the Ministry responsible for HE  A few countries (Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania) have set up specific QA agencies for Accreditation and/or Evaluation processes in HEIs  However, just over half of 48 SSA countries have dedicated national QA agencies & most of them face challenges in EQA  Most HEIs have not been able to set up effective IQA system

  6. Regional & Continental Africa (1/2)

  7. Regional & Continental Africa (2/2) AFRICAN UNION (AU) - Continent Regional Economic Communities (RECs) of African Union:  Arab Maghreb Union (AMU) - North  Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) – West  East African Community (EAC) – East  Southern African Development Community (SADC) – South  Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) – Centre Linguistic Groupings Arabic, English, French & Portuguese

  8. Regional QA Initiatives (1/2)  2003: HEQMISA, an initiative started in 2002 to promote QA in Southern African HEIs with support from GIZ(GTZ); assistance provided to Malawi, Namibia, etc. Not much progress made  2005-2014: IUCEA with support from DAAD & HRK embarked on promoting QA systems in public & private HEIs in 5 East African countries: • Handbook (4 Vols) produced • Establishment of East African HE QA Network (EAQAN) in 2012  2006: CAMES (African & Malagasy Council for Higher Education) starts QA of programs in HEIs in its 19 Francophone member states  2007: Arab Network for QA in HE (ANQAHE) created to support QA agencies in the region. Works closely with Association of Arab Universities

  9. Regional QA Initiatives (2/2)  2013: DAAD and several African partner organisations, launched EWAQAS (Enhancing West African QA Structures) in West & Central Africa: • Francophone countries: training courses in EQA & IQA; RAQUES - Alumni Network created • Anglophone countries: training for IQA; WAAQAN - Alumni Network created  2014: Launch of Southern African QA Network (SAQAN) of national QA agencies & HEIs in SADC region. 4 th SAQAN conference held in Lesotho in Oct. 2018  DAAD, IIEP/UNESCO & SAQAN to run blended learning courses on EQA for QA agencies in SADC region in 2019 & 2020

  10. Continental QA Initiatives (1/3)  2006: ICQAHEA launched as African QA Forum, supported by UNESCO, AUC, AAU, GUNI, ADEA, etc. Meets every year; 11 th Conference in Oct. 2019 in Abuja, Nigeria  2009: AfriQAN formally launched and hosted by AAU, for capacity building of national QA agencies & HEIs. Initially supported by WB & UNESCO. Activities limited by lack of funds  2010: African Quality Rating Mechanism (AQRM) for rating HEIs launched by AUC; uses self-assessment against set standards + external evaluation; complements internal & external QA process; some 50+ HEIs continent-wide assessed by 2017  2015: HAQAA (Harmonization of African QA & Accreditation) launched by AU with EU funding & support from several African & European organisations under Joint Africa-EU Strategy. HAQAA to contribute towards creation of Pan African QA & Accreditation Framework (PAQAF)

  11. Continental Tools under PAQAF (3/3)  1. African Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ASG-QA ): • Developed through collaboration between AU and EU and several African & European organizations & associations between 2017 and 2018 under the HAQAA Initiative • An overriding set of S&G that provide a baseline for development of good QA systems & practices in HE in Africa • Provides S&G for EQA, IQA & IQA of QA agencies • Available in English, French, Arabic & Portuguese • Pending endorsement by the African Union  2. Continental Qualifications Framework – Pending development. Needs input from Regional QFs – not developed yet in all regions  3. African Quality Rating Mechanism (AQRM)

  12. Continental Tools under PAQAF (3/3)  4. Addis Convention for Recognition of Qualifications – a revision of the Arusha Convention, developed, pending legal approval and ratification by many African states.  5. African Credit Accumulation and Transfer System – proposal initiated by the TUNING Africa initiative, pending further development.  6. Continental Register for QA agencies and quality assured higher education institutions - pending development Ultimately, it is proposed to create a Continental Accreditation Agency for oversight & implementation of above tools

  13. Challenges & Way Forward (1/2)  Over past 2 decades, significant progress made in addressing QA in HE, regional cooperation playing an important role  Two essentially independent approaches being used: • Bottom up at regional level • Top down at continental level Harmonization of the 2 approaches must be ensured  At HEI level, major handicaps are inadequate capacity for internal reviews, too heavy teaching & administrative load of academic staff & lack of funds  National QA agencies also lack trained staff, capacity for evaluation of HEIs, and funds  Private HE, especially for-profit, growing rapidly – difficult to use traditional EQA approach for all private HEIs. They need special attention

  14. Challenges & Way Forward (2/2)  Lack of experience in Africa in applying Evaluation process to ODL and CBHE – again increasing rapidly and have their own specificity [Use of OECD Guidelines for Quality Provision in CBHE]  Very little work done on QA of graduate programs, in particular doctoral. PhD graduates increasing rapidly and require attention. CHE of South Africa started EQA for PhDs in 2019 – needs to be followed up  Sustainability of most QA Networks is difficult because of lack of funds – funding through membership fees grossly insufficient; yet they have an important role to play  The ASG-QA is a valuable tool and should be fully utilised (adapted if necessary) by HEIs and QA agencies  HAQAA initiative comes at an opportune time to coordinate and harmonise QA activities and ensure ownership by African countries, associations, agencies and institutions

  15. THANK YOU

Recommend


More recommend