Reducing the pupil premium gap Background Background But this does - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Northfleet School for Girls Reducing the pupil premium gap

Background

Background But this does not show …………..

The Story! Year % 5A*-C with PPG Gap English and Maths 2012 50% -32% 2013 64% -43% 2014 52% -21%

Why do PPG underachieve? • Low aspiration • Lack of parental support • Staff prejudice • Literacy issues • Underperformance at primary school – leading to a perpetuating issues • Wider awareness issues – confidence and ability to apply learning

The staged response to PPG Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Tackling attendance early Engaging parents Tackling literacy – reading ages Widening horizons Aspirational targets Closely targeted intervention

Step change – how does it happen? Year % 5A*-C with PPG Gap English and Maths 2012 50% -32% 2013 64% -43% 2014 52% -21%

High Expectations • Leading from the top • Leading by example • Leading from the gutter • Leading by example • 2011 English • 2012 Maths ‘Good’ • 2013 5A*-C EM

How did it happen? • Micro-management of En and Ma • Change of leadership En and Ma • NQT, GTP replacing UPS, AST • Strategic use of carousel and timetable • PiXL CPD for new HoDs • Intervention (targeted small group teaching in curriculum spaces)

Small group teaching to meet specific needs in Maths

1:1 English

In science

In maths

Intervention • Subject specialist • Focused on filling gaps • Targeted to those who need it most • Time limited • Not talk about me time • Not talk about problems with other students time • Not talk about failure of teacher time • Not solutions that are pastoral (other space)

Intervention Programme 2014 French History 9 C+ 4 C+ 82% A*-C (46%) Science 73% T+ 33% A*- C (35%) 31 C+ Spanish 16% T+ 57% A*-C (53%) HoD En, Ma, Sci, Gg, Hi released from base group 5 C+ 48% T+ Academic coach En, Ma, Sci Maths 42% A*-C (38%) 42 C+ 25% T+ English 65% A*-C (62%) Geography 23 C+ 64% T+ 7 C+ 77% A*-C (71%) 30% A*-C (23%) 66% T+ 26% T+

But on the rising tide…

Why were they left behind? Year % 5A*-C with PPG Gap English and Maths 2012 50% -32% 2013 64% -43% 2014 49% -20%

The missing link • Micro-management of En and Ma • Change of leadership En and Ma • NQT, GTP replacing UPS, AST • Strategic use of carousel and timetable • PiXL CPD for new HoDs

Intervention – targeted June 2013 (Year 10) Why do they get special treatment? Is it fair when good students that want to do well can’t have this?

In science

In Spanish

In French

As a Senior Leader in school, what would you ask middle leaders to do in response to this data? Relentless tracking How would you measure impact in your school? Who would you report to? Ever 6 Never 6 Within GCSE Subject FSM A-C %A-C NON FSM A-C %A-C School Gap English 45 32 71.1% 117 100 85.5% -14.4% Maths 45 17 37.8% 118 76 64.4% -26.6% English Lit 38 29 76.3% 109 97 89.0% -12.7% Science 39 10 25.6% 112 56 50.0% -24.4% Add Science 39 11 28.2% 110 62 56.4% -28.2% French 8 2 25.0% 34 14 41.2% -16.2% Spanish 10 2 20.0% 36 14 38.9% -18.9% Geography 9 3 33.3% 40 20 50.0% -16.7% History 21 9 42.9% 54 40 74.1% -31.2% Business Studies 5 3 60.0% 19 13 68.4% -8.4% Computing 4 2 50.0% 7 3 42.9% 7.1% Food 17 11 64.7% 35 28 80.0% -15.3% ICT 8 6 75.0% 18 13 72.2% 2.8% Media Studies 10 8 80.0% 36 30 83.3% -3.3% Product Design 2 1 50.0% 6 5 83.3% -33.3% Textiles 1 1 100.0% 6 6 100.0% 0.0% D&T Overall 3 2 66.7% 12 11 91.7% -25.0%

SIMS – tracking impact

Intervention PPG French (46%) English (71%) 60% A*-C PP 100% A*-C PP Science (53%) 67% A*-C PP History (35%) 50% A*-C PP Geography (23%) Maths (62%) 50% A*-C PP 67% A*-C PP 106 students received intervention 207 interventions/week. 27 PP (63%) → C+

Attainment PPG 2014 Within Ever 6 Never 6 School GCSE Subject FSM A-C %A-C NON FSM A-C %A-C Gap English 45 27 60.0% 116 87 75.0% -15.0% Maths 45 21 46.7% 116 78 67.2% -20.6% English Lit 41 22 53.7% 114 72 63.2% -9.5% Science 40 16 40.0% 110 63 57.3% -17.3% Add Science 32 13 40.6% 98 57 58.2% -17.5% French 8 5 62.5% 33 14 42.4% 20.1% Spanish 9 3 33.3% 36 14 38.9% -5.6% Geography 8 4 50.0% 40 7 17.5% 32.5% History 21 4 19.0% 54 22 40.7% -21.7% Business Studies 6 3 50.0% 19 4 21.1% 28.9% Computing 4 0 0.0% 7 4 57.1% -57.1% Food 15 2 13.3% 34 16 47.1% -33.7% ICT 9 2 22.2% 17 5 29.4% -7.2% Media Studies 9 8 88.9% 36 23 63.9% 25.0% Product Design 2 2 100.0% 6 2 33.3% 66.7% Textiles 1 1 100.0% 6 6 100.0% 0.0% D&T Overall 3 3 100.0% 12 8 66.7% 33.3%

Non-negotiables for impact • Pupils • Parents • Staff • SIMS • Relentless • Celebration • Honesty

How can governors monitor? • Pages 62-65 of the raise – Gaps in 5A*-C EN/MA – Gaps in VA – Gaps in progress rates by subject

Ongoing monitoring Issue Key data Key questions Low aspiration Profile of target grades for PPG students as How does the school account for PPG students compared to non. underperforming at primary? Lack of parental Percentage of PPG students attending How does the school ensure PPG attendance? support parents eve (or of those who did not what Why do PPG parents not attend? percentage were PPG (and EAL)) What is the follow up for PPG students who do not attend? Survey students – who went through their report with their parents? Literacy issues English grades at KS3 for PPG and Non How does the school tackle reading issues early Reading ages for PPG and Non to prevent literacy issues later? Book loan records for PPG and Non How does the school support parents with reading? Underperformance at Compare KS2 SATS against CATS or other How does the school examine attainment for Primary school data PPG at primary school when setting targets? 4LOP minimum for PPG students Who are the main feeder primaries and how do their PPG results compare with national? Wider awareness/ life Records of PPG attendance at out of school How does the school encourage and support PPG experiences clubs students to be involved in enrichment activities. Records of attendance for PPG students on trips and visits