reducing computational complexity of sparse grid
play

Reducing computational complexity of sparse grid stochastic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reducing computational complexity of sparse grid stochastic collocation methods Peter Jantsch QUIET Workshop, Trieste July 19, 2017 Joint work with C. Webster, A. Teckentrup, M. Gunzburger, D. Galindo, G. Zhang Supported by the US Dept. of


  1. Reducing computational complexity of sparse grid stochastic collocation methods Peter Jantsch QUIET Workshop, Trieste July 19, 2017 Joint work with C. Webster, A. Teckentrup, M. Gunzburger, D. Galindo, G. Zhang Supported by the US Dept. of Energy, Office of Advanced Simulation Computing Research

  2. Improving Collocation Methods by Exploiting Structure Uncertain input Quantity of PDE model: parameters: interest: P ( u , y ) = 0 − → − → y ∈ Γ ⊂ R d a.e. in D ⊂ R n Q [ u ( · , y )]

  3. Improving Collocation Methods by Exploiting Structure Uncertain input Quantity of PDE model: parameters: interest: P ( u , y ) = 0 − → − → y ∈ Γ ⊂ R d a.e. in D ⊂ R n Q [ u ( · , y )] Method 1: Exploit the hierarchy in deterministic approximation. Multilevel methods reduce complexity by distributing computational costs among high and low fidelity approximations. Interpolation Nodes 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −1 −1 −1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 Finite Element Mesh 1 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

  4. Improving Collocation Methods by Exploiting Structure Uncertain input Quantity of PDE model: parameters: interest: P ( u , y ) = 0 − → − → y ∈ Γ ⊂ R d a.e. in D ⊂ R n Q [ u ( · , y )] Method 1: Exploit the hierarchy in deterministic approximation. Multilevel methods reduce complexity by distributing computational costs among high and low fidelity approximations. Interpolation Nodes 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −1 −1 −1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 Finite Element Mesh 1 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Key points: • Provably reduce the complexity of constructing collocation approximations by exploiting basic structure. • Work practically even when we can’t choose a sparse grid with the “optimal” number of points.

  5. Improving Collocation Methods by Exploiting Structure Method 2: Exploit the hierarchy in the polynomial approximation. Sparse grids with nested grid points provide a natural multilevel hierarchy which we can use to accelerate each PDE solve. 1 1 Solve A j c j = f j 0.5 at all blue points 0.5 − → 0 0 Interpolate to improve −0.5 −0.5 convergence −1 −1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1

  6. Improving Collocation Methods by Exploiting Structure Method 2: Exploit the hierarchy in the polynomial approximation. Sparse grids with nested grid points provide a natural multilevel hierarchy which we can use to accelerate each PDE solve. 1 1 Solve A j c j = f j 0.5 at all blue points 0.5 − → 0 0 Interpolate to improve −0.5 −0.5 convergence −1 −1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 Key points: • Acceleration works with preconditioning and initial solutions to speed up iterative solvers. • Especially effective for non-linear iterative solvers • Improves efficiency of iterative solvers even with the additional cost of interpolation.

Recommend


More recommend