Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reduced equations and special solutions for geomorphic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BEM2014 2014/ 10/ 04 Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break Flows In celebration of Professor Young Der-Liangs 70th birthday Herv Capart Dept of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University Sources 2 Capart,


  • BEM2014 2014/ 10/ 04 Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break Flows In celebration of Professor Young Der-Liang’s 70th birthday Hervé Capart Dept of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University

  • Sources 2 Capart, H., and D.L. Young (1998) Formation of a jump by the dam- break wave over a granular bed. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 372, 165– 187. Fraccarollo, L., and H. Capart (2002) Riemann wave description of erosional dam-break flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 461, 183–228. Capart, H., M. Bellal, and D.L. Young (2007) Self-similar evolution of semi-infinite alluvial channels with moving boundaries. Journal of Sedimentary Research 77, 13-22. Hsu, J.P.C., and H. Capart (2008) Onset and growth of tributary-dammed lakes. Water Resources Research 44(11), W11201. Spinewine, B., and Capart, H. (2013) Intense bed-load due to a sudden dam-break. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 731, 579-614. Capart, H. (2013) Analytical solutions for gradual dam breaching and downstream river flooding. Water Resources Research 49(4), 1968- 1987.

  • Geomorphic dam break and dam breach flows 3 Dam break: sudden failure of rigid dam Example: Balin check dam, September 2007 NTU-MHRG Sudden water release produces geomorphic change. Dam breach: Gradual failure of loose dam Example: Tangjiashan landslide dam, June 2008 Xinhua Water outflow and geomorphic change drive each other.

  • Research strategy 4 How to make these problems mathematically tractable ? 1) Use lab and field observations to guide the mathematics 2) Cast the flows as m oving boundary problems. 3) Exploit similarity and quasi-linearity to find special solutions .

  • Taipei dam break experiments (Capart and Young, 1998) 5

  • Louvain dam break experiments (Spinewine and Capart, 2013) 6

  • 7 Evolving boundaries

  • 8 Experimental Vertical flow structure Theoretical

  • 9 Semi-empirical closure relations

  • Depth-integrated governing equations (Spinewine and Capart, 2013) 10 ~   z h u   0   t x   h cu    ( z c h c ) 0   0 t x     h u z          2 ( h u h )    t x x

  • Quasi-linear hyperbolic equations 11 Homogeneous hyperbolic system   W W   B ( W ) 0   t x Eigenstructure   ( i ) ( i ) BK K i

  • Riemann wave solution (Fraccarollo and Capart, 2002) 12 Self-similar expansion  t  W ( x , t ) W ( x / t ) Integrate across simple wave dW dW dW   1 2 3 ( i ) ( i ) ( i ) K K K 1 2 3 x    i t

  • 13 Comparison with experiments

  • 14 Predicted velocity and concentration maps

  • Detailed comparisons with experiments (Spinewine and Capart, 2013) 15

  • Dam breach example: 2009 Namaxia debris dam 16 Forestry Bureau, Taiwan

  • Alluvial diffusion theory (Capart, Bellal, Young, 2007; Hsu and Capart, 2008) 17 Water-driven diffusion   2 z z   s w KQ 0   2 t x Complementary constraints on water surface profile   z w z        w 0 ( z ( z h )) 0 z z h   w s 0 w s 0 x x

  • Self-similar behavior (Capart, Bellal and Young, 2007) 18 Diffusion problem   2 z z   s s KQ ( t ) 0   2 t x  x   x C t ( ) Self-similar solution   z s   x  f     Qdt  Qdt      x C Qdt

  • Dam breach solution (Capart, 2013) 19 S.Y.J. Lai dz ( t )   L A Q ( t ) L dt   1 / 2 3 / 2 8 Q ( t ) bg ( t ) 27      ( t ) R Qdt D

  • Reduction to a pair of autonomous ODEs 20 ODE pair   3 / 2 d ( t )    dt   3 / 2 d ( t )     3 / 2  dt Solution          2 ( )  2  2 2 t   t ( )   2 1 4 1 t 8

  • Solution plots 21 Breach drop  ˆ 2 ( t ) t   ˆ 2 d t 1 B Discharge hydrograph ˆ 3 Q ( t ) 8 t   2 3 ˆ Q ( 1 t ) P t t  ˆ T P

  • 22 Application to 1996 Lake Ha! Ha! dyke breach GSC

  • Comparison with more field events 23 C B Xinhua / GSC

  • Flood wave routing to the downstream valley 24 S.Y.J. Lai Kinematic wave equation   8 gS h 3 h   1 / 2 V h 0   t 2 f x

  • 25 Solution by the method of characteristics

  • Wave profile evolution and discharge hydrographs at downstream stations 26

  • Comparison with 2008 Tangjiashan landslide dam breach flood 27

  • Conclusions 28 For both dam break and dam breach problems: 1) Reduced equations provide good approximations of real behavior. 2) Similarity and quasi-linearity can be exploited to find useful special solutions.

  • 29 Acknowledgements and thanks

  • 30 Acknowledgements and thanks