re po rting mic ro a g g re ssio ns thro ug h a mo b ile
play

Re po rting Mic ro a g g re ssio ns thro ug h a Mo b ile App - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Re po rting Mic ro a g g re ssio ns thro ug h a Mo b ile App Christy M. Byrd , PhD Unive rsity o f Ca lifo rnia , Sa nta Cruz Wha t a re mic ro a g g re ssio ns? E xa mple s Mic ro a g g re ssio ns a re Be ing sta re d a t


  1. Re po rting Mic ro a g g re ssio ns thro ug h a Mo b ile App Christy M. Byrd , PhD Unive rsity o f Ca lifo rnia , Sa nta Cruz

  2. Wha t a re mic ro a g g re ssio ns?  E xa mple s  Mic ro a g g re ssio ns a re  Be ing sta re d a t in sub tle a nd o fte n the d ining ha ll uninte ntio na l ve rb a l  So me o ne a sking to o r no nve rb a l slig hts to uc h yo ur ha ir b e c a use it is “e xo tic ” tha t de me a n a n  Be ing to ld yo u spe a k individua l b a se d o n E ng lish we ll whe n it is the ir me mb e rship in yo ur first la ng ua g e a ma rg ina lize d  Be ing mista ke n fo r so me o ne in a g ro up (Sue , 2010). se rvic e ro le

  3. Wha t type s o f mic ro a g g re ssio ns a re the re ?  Alie n in o ne 's o wn  Myth o f me rito c ra c y la nd  Pa tho lo g izing  Asc riptio n o f c ultura l va lue s/ style s inte llig e nc e  Se c o nd-c la ss c itize n  Co lo rb lindne ss  T ra ditio na l g e nde r  Crimina lity ro le pre judic e  Use o f  Se xua l se xist/ he te ro se xist la ng ua g e o b je c tific a tio n  De nia l o f individua l  Assumptio n o f pre judic e a b no rma lity

  4. Wha t a re the e ffe c ts o f e xpe rie nc ing mic ro a g g re ssio ns?  Psyc ho lo g ic a l e ffe c ts  Anxie ty  De pre ssive sympto ms  Se lf-e ste e m  Ac a de mic e ffe c ts  L o we r fe e ling s o f b e lo ng ing  L a c k o f c o nfide nc e in a b ilitie s  Po o r pe rfo rma nc e

  5. Wha t a re the limita tio ns in the e xisting re se a rc h lite ra ture ?  Re se a rc h re lie s o n re c a ll we e ks o r mo nths la te r - ma y b e ina c c ura te a nd unde re stima te impa c t  Ne e d to e xa mine ho w diffe re nt g ro ups a re a ffe c te d diffe re ntly  Da ily dia ry studie s a re e xpe nsive a nd fa tig uing  No e xisting re se a rc h o n inte rve ntio n stra te g ie s

  6. Wha t a re the g o a ls o f the study?  Inve stig a te the utility o f a mo b ile a pp fo r re po rting  Study e ffe c ts o f mic ro a g g re ssio ns o ve r time  T e st a po te ntia l inte rve ntio n

  7. Wha t is Mic ro Re po rt?  A mo b ile a pp fo r Andro id a nd iOS pho ne s de ve lo pe d a t UCSC  Use rs c a n re po rt mic ro a g g re ssio ns a nd vie w o the rs’ a no nymize d re po rts

  8. Wha t is the struc ture o f the study? Use the a pp fo r o ne  a c a d e mic ye a r 4 surve ys  Pe rc e ptio ns o f c a mpus  Ac a de mic o utc o me s  Psyc ho lo g ic a l we ll-  b e ing Ide ntity b e lie fs  2 wo rksho ps e a c h  q ua rte r Ba sic s  Re spo nding to  mic ro a g g re ssio ns

  9. Wo rksho ps Basic s Se lf-De fe nse  Wha t a re  Appe a l to va lue s mic ro a g g re ssio ns?  Sta te yo ur fe e ling s  T he me s  Use humo r  Pre vio us re se a rc h  Give info rma tio n

  10. Who a re the pa rtic ipa nts? (Surve y 3)  211 UCSC unde rg ra dua te a nd g ra dua te stude nts (70% wo me n)  31% Andro id use rs, 68% iPho ne use rs  18% le sb ia n, g a y, o r b ise xua l  26.5% Asia n/ Asia n Ame ric a n, 5.2% Bla c k/ Afric a n Ame ric a n, 30.3% Hispa nic / L a tino , 26.1% White / E uro pe a n Ame ric a n, 8.1% Multira c ia l  57% first g e ne ra tio n c o lle g e stude nts

  11. Wha t a re the me a sure s?  BAPC (.72)  Ba sic Ne e ds Sa tisfa c tio n - Co mpe te nc e (.79)  Ba sic Ne e ds Sa tisfa c tio n - Be lo ng ing (.82)  Co lle g e Sa tisfa c tio n (.80)  Ra c ia l-E thnic Mic ro a g g re ssio ns Sc a le (.93)  Se lf-re po rte d GPA

  12. Wha t a re the me a sure s?  CE S-D (.74)  Oxfo rd Ha ppine ss Sc a le (.82)  Ro se nb e rg Se lf-E ste e m Sc a le (.90)  Pe rc e ive d Stre ss Sc a le (.87)  Co ping Se lf-E ffic a c y  In the situa tio n (.78)  Pro b le m-fo c use d (.90)  So c ia l suppo rt (.71)  Sto p unple a sa nt tho ug hts/ fe e ling s (.91)

  13. Re po rts  74% ha ve ma de a re po rt  0-24 pe r pe rso n  Me a n # o f re po rts: 1.73 (SD = 3.23)  Me a n b o the re d ra ting : 55.52 (SD = 28.41)  No t c o rre la te d with surve y me a sure o f ra c ia l mic ro a g g re ssio ns

  14. L o ng itudina l Re la tio ns fo r Ra c ia l Mic ro a g g re ssio ns  T ime 1 (No ve mb e r) to T ime 3 (April)  Be lo ng ing (ns)  Se lf-e ste e m ( p < .001)  F e e ling s o f c o mpe te nc e ( p = .041)  Ha ppine ss (ns)  De pre ssive sympto ms ( p = .001)  Stre ss ( p = .027 )  Co ntro ls: time 1 o utc o me , g e nde r, ra c e , so c ia l c la ss, da ys b e twe e n surve ys

  15. Disc ussio n  App usa g e  L o ng itudina l finding s  L o g istic a l c o nside ra tio ns  Ne xt ste ps

  16. T ha nks to …  Our pa rtic ipa nts  Re se a rc h a ssista nts  Gra dua te stude nts  UCSC Co mmitte e o n Re se a rc h  Offic e o f Dive rsity, E q uity, a nd Inc lusio n c mb yrd @ uc sc .e d u

Recommend


More recommend