PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee Recommendations Prince William County School Board Meeting January 2, 2019 Denise Huebner, Associate Superintendent for Eastern Elementary Schools Dr. Matthew R. Cartlidge, Supervisor of Planning, Office of Facilities Services

Presentation Outline A. Current School Capacity & Boundaries B. Capital Improvements Scheduled C. Boundary Planning Process D. Proposed Boundary Plans a. Plan 2a b. Plan 3 c. Plan 3a 1/2/2019 2

Current School Boundaries & Capacities (2018-19) 1/2/2019 3

1/2/2019 4

Elementary Enrollment Projections (Current Boundaries) Facility Data 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 2025-26 Demographics School Name 2019 Total Pct. of Total Pct. of Total Pct. Of Total Pct. of Total Pct. Of Pct. Econ. Portable Pct. LEP Disadvantaged Pct. Minority Program Classrooms Students Capacity Students Capacity Students Capacity Students Capacity Students Capacity Capacity 914 1 632 69.2% 644 70.5% 646 70.6% 647 70.8% 656 71.7% 13.8% 31.7% 62.4% Antietam ES 547 0 454 83.0% 475 86.8% 491 89.7% 508 92.8% 514 94.0% 42.9% 73.1% 87.5% Belmont ES 418 3 493 118.0% 508 121.5% 510 122.0% 511 122.3% 518 123.9% 55.3% 81.1% 93.8% Feathers tone ES Kerrydale ES 355 6 448 126.2% 427 120.3% 428 120.7% 431 121.5% 437 123.1% 44.5% 72.7% 90.0% 684 0 768 112.3% 742 108.5% 744 108.8% 772 112.9% 793 115.9% 51.5% 75.2% 91.6% Kilby ES 862 5 579 67.2% 578 67.0% 578 67.1% 583 67.6% 590 68.5% 18.2% 38.6% 67.6% Lake Ridge ES 580 5 661 114.0% 658 113.4% 666 114.8% 730 125.8% 754 130.0% 52.4% 78.8% 93.6% Marums co Hills ES Minnieville ES 623 1 550 88.3% 518 83.1% 520 83.4% 527 84.6% 534 85.6% 41.8% 70.4% 92.3% 498 7 649 130.4% 645 129.6% 649 130.3% 669 134.3% 679 136.3% 37.5% 60.8% 83.3% Occoquan ES 532 1 745 140.1% 730 137.2% 732 137.6% 743 139.7% 753 141.6% 24.0% 34.6% 62.4% Old Bridge ES 661 5 874 132.2% 881 133.3% 901 136.3% 925 140.0% 942 142.5% 19.1% 34.3% 74.3% Penn ES Potomac View ES 529 10 633 119.6% 658 124.4% 667 126.0% 689 130.3% 698 132.0% 52.9% 81.2% 92.2% 522 5 622 119.2% 647 124.0% 653 125.2% 690 132.1% 707 135.5% 24.3% 45.4% 71.4% Rockledge ES 920 7 653 71.0% 650 70.6% 651 70.8% 654 71.1% 662 72.0% 15.6% 28.0% 62.1% Springwoods ES 586 3 594 101.3% 583 99.5% 584 99.6% 586 100.0% 594 101.3% 45.6% 75.9% 90.3% Vaughan ES Wes tridge ES 709 2 685 96.6% 710 100.1% 712 100.4% 714 100.7% 723 102.0% 10.4% 21.5% 58.8% Total 9,940 61 10,042 101.0% 10,054 101.1% 10,132 101.9% 10,380 104.4% 10,553 106.2% 33.4% 54.9% 78.8% Notes: Capacity includes classroom additions opening in 2019-20. 1/2/2019 5

School Capacity Utilization Prior to Additions and Boundary Adjustment Utilization of Affected Schools without Additions 165% 145% 125% 105% 85% 65% 2019-20 Utilization 2023-24 Utilization 1/2/2019 6

Past & Current Capital Improvements Eastern Prince William County Past Current Additional Additional Year School Cost Year School Cost Seats Seats 2016 Wilson ES $ 28,534,000 997 Antietam ES Addition $ 10,384,000 345 Kilby ES Replacement $ 31,476,000 313 Lake Ridge ES Addition $ 10,884,000 327 Covington-Harper ES $ 29,374,000 750 Springwoods ES Addition $ 11,884,000 327 2019 2017 Belmont ES Addition $ 8,667,000 187 Minnieville ES Addition $ 12,043,000 176 Henderson Addition $ 9,318,000 253 Leesylvania ES Addition $ 6,900,000 108 Neabsco ES Addition $ 7,904,000 149 PW Parkway ES $ 32,685,000 749 $ 115,273,000 2,649 Total $ 84,780,000 2,032 Total 1/2/2019 7

2019 Capital Improvements Eastern Prince William County 1/2/2019 8

“PW Parkway” Elementary 1/2/2019 9

School Capacity Utilization After Additions and No Boundary Adjustment Utilization of Affected Schools with Additions 165% 145% 125% 105% 85% 65% 2019-20 Utilization 2023-24 Utilization 1/2/2019 10

Boundary Planning Process Governed by: • School Board Policy 264 • Regulation 264-2 1/2/2019 11

School Board Policy 264 • Provides for the creation of the Boundary Planning Committee to:  Obtain public input in the boundary planning process  Develop elementary school boundary plan proposals  Receive public input during the Community Meetings to make modifications to its boundary plans (as necessary)  Prepare a Final Report that includes recommendations for the School Board’s consideration • “School boundaries for each school are established by the School Board based on the need to provide for instructional effectiveness and the health, safety, and general welfare of all students.” 1/2/2019 12

Regulation 264-2 • Each boundary plan will attempt to: • Balance enrollments at the affected schools within ±15% of the total capacity utilization over the next 3 years • Minimize the number of times a specific geographic area is reassigned schools within the past several years at a specific school level (e.g., elementary, middle, & high) • Facilitate the efficient transport of students • Avoid splitting small neighborhoods • Improve geographic progression of communities • Consider the demographic balance 1/2/2019 13

Demographic Balance • Boundary Planning Committee considers three demographic variables • LEP (Limited English Proficiency) • Economically Disadvantaged • Minority • Awareness of these data provides for the drawing of boundaries that embraces diversity among schools in the Division 1/2/2019 14

Boundary Committee Responsibilities • Review the initial plan developed by the Office of Facilities Services • Analyze student enrollment, school capacity, housing, and demographic data • Collaborate and develop new boundary plans • Hold two Community Meetings with intent to gain “input” from community members • Modify boundary proposals (as necessary) • Prepare a Final Report to the School Board with boundary recommendation(s) for consideration 1/2/2019 15

Plan 2a Proposed Boundaries 1/2/2019 16

1/2/2019 17

Plan 2a Capacity Utilization Facility Data 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 2025-26 Demographics 2019 School Name Total Pct. of Total Pct. of Total Pct. of Total Pct. of Total Pct. Of Pct. Econ. Portable Pct. LEP Disadvantaged Pct. Minority Program Classrooms Students Capacity Students Capacity Students Capacity Students Capacity Students Capacity Capacity 749 665 88.8% 638 85.2% 644 86.0% 665 88.8% 680 90.8% 41.2% 65.1% 82.6% PW Parkway ES 914 774 84.7% 804 88.0% 806 88.1% 830 90.8% 843 92.3% 17.6% 34.4% 66.4% Antietam ES Belmont ES 547 540 98.8% 553 101.0% 568 103.8% 585 106.9% 592 108.2% 42.4% 71.0% 87.5% 418 430 102.8% 445 106.3% 446 106.8% 448 107.1% 453 108.4% 54.7% 80.3% 93.8% Feathers tone ES 355 350 98.6% 336 94.6% 337 94.8% 339 95.5% 343 96.8% 42.7% 71.5% 88.5% Kerrydale ES Kilby ES 684 630 92.1% 610 89.2% 613 89.6% 641 93.7% 659 96.4% 51.9% 76.2% 92.0% 862 697 80.8% 704 81.7% 705 81.8% 710 82.4% 719 83.4% 16.9% 37.6% 66.3% Lake Ridge ES 580 578 99.7% 578 99.6% 586 101.0% 649 111.9% 673 115.9% 50.9% 77.5% 93.7% Marums co Hills ES 623 635 102.0% 599 96.1% 601 96.5% 609 97.7% 616 98.9% 43.4% 71.5% 93.5% Minnieville ES Occoquan ES 498 528 106.1% 525 105.4% 528 106.1% 542 108.9% 550 110.5% 41.9% 65.8% 87.1% 532 461 86.7% 467 87.7% 468 87.9% 472 88.7% 478 89.8% 14.4% 23.1% 54.1% Old Bridge ES 661 656 99.2% 643 97.2% 650 98.4% 665 100.7% 678 102.6% 20.6% 41.6% 77.4% Penn ES Potomac View ES 529 497 94.0% 518 97.9% 526 99.4% 547 103.5% 554 104.8% 56.0% 83.9% 91.1% 522 482 92.3% 475 91.0% 475 91.1% 483 92.5% 489 93.7% 23.3% 47.0% 69.2% Rockledge ES 920 889 96.6% 901 97.9% 903 98.1% 906 98.4% 917 99.7% 16.2% 29.4% 66.1% Springwoods ES Vaughan ES 586 570 97.3% 571 97.4% 572 97.6% 576 98.2% 583 99.5% 52.0% 79.7% 94.5% 709 659 93.0% 690 97.4% 704 99.3% 715 100.8% 724 102.1% 9.1% 14.4% 54.0% Wes tridge ES Affected Schools Total 10,689 10,042 93.9% 10,054 94.1% 10,132 94.8% 10,380 97.1% 10,553 98.7% 33.4% 54.9% 78.8% Notes: *Totals may not reflect sum of integers because of use of fractions in forecasted student enrollment. 1/2/2019 18

Plan 3 Proposed Boundaries 1/2/2019 19

1/2/2019 20