print version lecture 53 redox chemistry arsenic ii
play

Print version Lecture #53 Redox Chemistry: Arsenic II, Geochemistry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Updated: 2 May 2019 Print version Lecture #53 Redox Chemistry: Arsenic II, Geochemistry (Stumm & Morgan, Chapt.8 ) Benjamin; Chapter 9 David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 1 Arsenic Geology 20th in Abundance in Earths Crust Typically


  1. Updated: 2 May 2019 Print version Lecture #53 Redox Chemistry: Arsenic II, Geochemistry (Stumm & Morgan, Chapt.8 ) Benjamin; Chapter 9 David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 1

  2. Arsenic Geology  20th in Abundance in Earth’s Crust  Typically Associated with Igneous or Sedimentary Rocks  Arsenic Concentrations Tend to be High in Igneous Rocks Containing Iron Oxides  Often Associated with Sulfidic Ores From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 2

  3. Geology (cont.)  Approximately 245 Arsenic Bearing Minerals have been Identified  Some Common Arsenic Bearing Minerals  Realgar (AsS)  Orpinent (As 2 O 3 )  Arsenopyrite (FeAsS) . H 2 O)  Scorodite (FeAsO 4 From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 3

  4. National Distribution of Arsenic in Groundwater From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) Welsh et al. 2000 David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 4

  5. Arsenic Mobility  Theoretically As(III) tends to be more Mobile than As(V)  As(V) will Strongly Sorb to Iron Oxides  To a lesser Extent, As(V) will Sorb to Manganese Oxides  However, As(VI) Associated with Iron Oxides may be Transported (Colloidal As)  Changes in Redox Conditions may Mobilize Arsenic From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 5

  6. Arsenic Size Distribution Size < 3K Dalton 0.45u > Size > 3K Dalton Size > 0.45u 100 100 80 % of Total As 80 % of Total As 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 Surface Water Ground Water From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) Reference: Brandhuber and Amy 1998 David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 6

  7. From: Hering & Elimelech, 1996; AWWARF Report David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 7

  8. Arsenic E h - pH Diagram in Pure Water From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) Arsenate H2 O Unstable 1.000 H O2 (g) H3 AsO4 O .750 - H2 AsO4 .500 O = As - OH 2- HAsO 4 .250 O 3- H AsO 4 E h H 3 AsO 3 0 (V) -.250 Arsenite As AsH 3 - H 2 AsO 3 -.500 H H 2 (g) O -.750 H 2 O Unstable 2- HAsO 3 -1.00 0 As 8 0 2 4 6 10 12 14 O O p H H H Reference: Ferguson and Garvis (1972) David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 8

  9. As and S  Ferguson & Gavis, 1972 [Wat. Res. 6:1259]  As T = 10 -5 M  S T = 10 -3 M  Solids in () From: Evangelou, 1998, Environmental Soil and Water Chemistry, Wily Publ. David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 9

  10. Regulatory Dates I  1942, Public Health Service Establishes 50 ppb Standard  1975, EPA formalizes 50 ppb Standard  1989, EPA misses the First of Several Deadlines for Revising Rule  June 22, 2000, EPA Proposes MCL of 5 ppb  January 22, 2001, EPA Publishes Final Rule, MCL of 10 ppb From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 10

  11. Regulatory Dates II  March 20, 2001, EPA Announces it will “Reassess” Costs and Scientific Issues, Delay Rule 60 Days  April 23, 2001, EPA Announces Additional Delay of Nine Months  May 22, 2001, EPA Announces Delay Until February 22, 2002  July 19, 2001, EPA Request Comment on MCL’s of 20, 5 and 3 as Alternative to 10 ppb  October 31, 2001, EPA announces that As standard will be 10 ppb (effective 2006?) From presentations by Brandhuber (2001) & Kempic (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 11

  12. New regulated Possible Extension contaminants  UCMR: 12 months of sampling within window Initial Final List List Health CCL1 CCL2 CCL3 50 42 106 chemicals 10 9 12 microbials Preliminary Final Proposed Final Not actual Rulemaking Process Regulatory Regulatory Schedule Rule Rule Determination Determination Occurrence UCMR1 UCMR2 UCMR3 Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring L1: 12 & 0 L1: 10 & 0 28 & 2 L2: 15 & 1 L2: 15 & 0 98 03 99 00 01 02 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 12 Year 12

  13. Other new or revised rules expected  Revised TCR  E. coli in; fecal coliforms out <5% positive for TC as before  Published: Feb 13, 2013 with Apr 1, 2016 effective date http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/tcr/regulation_revisions.cfm   Revised Pb/Cu Rule Revised LCR:  New site selection criteria & sampling procedures not before 2020 no flushing or removal or aerators   Same 0.015 mg/L & 1.3 mg/L action levels (in 10% of samples)  Perchlorate (ClO 4 - )  Peer review in 1/2017; Proposed rule is delayed States: MA @ 2µg/L; CA @6µg/L; others advisory @1-18µg/L   Chlorate (ClO 3 - )  Could be a problem for on-site hypochlorite generation (Stanford, 2014)  Hexavalent Chromium  Currently regulated as total Cr  Likely carcinogen: Final health assessment: end of 2011  Late addition to UCMR 3 (2013-2015) 13

  14. A “simple” view of what’s happening Carcinogenic Carcinogenic Six-Year 2 Six-Year 3 Proposal Six-Year 3 VOCs Final VOCs Proposal (3/ 2010) (<3/ 2014) (3/ 2016) (2/ 2018) (10/ 2013) (not required) RTCR Final RTCR (S ummer, Effective 2012) (S ummer, 2015) CCR Review (12 – 16 months) UCMR3 UCMR3 Monitoring Proposal (1/ 2013 – 12/ 2015) (3/ 2011) LT2ESWTR Review Round 2 LT2ESWTR LT2ESWTR Meetings Method Monitoring - ClO 4 (4/ 2015 – 5/ 2021) Meeting - LT-LCR Proposal LT-LCR ClO 4 (in 2011) Proposal (3/ 2013) Final Final (10/ 2012) (10/ 2014) (3/ 2017) 2012 2015 2016 2013 2014 2017 Reg Det 3 CCL3 Final Reg Det 3 CCL4 Proposal CCL4 Final Final Proposal (<10/ 2013) (10/ 2009) (<10/ 2014) (<7/ 2013) 1 (<7/ 2012) Key Final Rule(s) Proposed Rule(s) Proposal – no fill (<7/ 2015) 1 (<1/ 2017) 1 Final –filled Uncertain – cross hatched Not e: As yet unassigned (fluoride, acrylamide, epichlorohydrin, t ot al chromium / Cr(VI)) Modified from: Steve Via, AWWA Unique color for related regulatory actions 14

  15. Impact to Utilities, Alternative MCL’s 10 9 # CWS I mpacted (1000s) 8 7 6 5 4 GW SW 3 2 1 0 3 5 10 20 Alternative MCL (ug/ L) EPA: Federal Register From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) 65(121):38888 David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 15

  16.  Key Features of Arsenic’s Chemistry in Water  Present in two Oxidation States  Behaves as an Acid  Arsenate (As(V)) - = > HAsO 4 2- = > AsO 4 3-  H 3 AsO 4 = > H 2 AsO 4  Arsenite (As(III)) - = > HAsO 3 2-  H 3 AsO 3 = > H 2 AsO 3 From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 16

  17. Coagulation  As(V) is much better removed than As(III) From: Hering & Elimelech, 1996; AWWARF Report David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 17

  18. Coagulation  Alum vs Ferric  Fe(III) is clearly better  Why? From: Hering & Elimelech, 1996; AWWARF Report David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 18

  19.  Oxidize - - O 3  - Cl 2 - MnO 4  Treat  - RO/NF - Coagulation/MF - Activated Alumina - Ion Exchange - Greensand - Iron media (GFH)  Dispose of Residual  - POTW - Dewater - Landfill From presentation by Philip Brandhuber (2001) David Reckhow CEE 680 #52 19

  20. Ferrous Arsenite  Initial Arsenite:Fe ratio of 1:1  From GEO-CHEM-PC From: Evangelou, 1998, Environmental Soil and Water Chemistry, Wily Publ. David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 20

  21.  To next lecture DAR David Reckhow CEE 680 #53 21

Recommend


More recommend