prescription drug m isuse and the north carolina
play

Prescription Drug M isuse and The North Carolina Controlled - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Prescription Drug M isuse and The North Carolina Controlled Substances Reporting System Joint Legislative Health Care Oversight Committee September 7, 2010 William Bronson, Drug Control Unit Division of Mental Health, Developmental


  1. Prescription Drug M isuse and The North Carolina Controlled Substances Reporting System Joint Legislative Health Care Oversight Committee September 7, 2010 William Bronson, Drug Control Unit Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities & Substance Abuse Services

  2. Epidemics of unintentional drug overdose deaths in the U.S., 1970-2006* Prescription drugs 10 9 Crude rate per 100,000 8 7 6 Crack cocaine 5 Heroin 4 3 2 1 0 '70 '72 '74 '76 '78 '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 * 2006 rate is estimated. Year Len Paulozzi, M D, M PH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

  3. Past Year Initiates for Specific Illicit Drugs among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2008 2008 NSDUH Survey

  4. Past M onth Nonmedical Use of Types of Psychotherapeutic Drugs among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2008 2008 NSDUH Survey

  5. Unintentional drug overdose death rates and total sales of opioid analgesics in morphine equivalents by year in the U.S. Deaths/100,000 Opioid sales (mg/person) 8 800 7 700 6 600 5 500 4 400 3 300 2 200 1 100 0 0 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 Len Paulozzi, M D, M PH Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

  6. Deaths vs M isuse Deaths/100,000 Opioid sales (mg/person) 8 800 7 700 6 600 5 500 4 400 3 300 2 200 1 100 0 0 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06

  7. Unintentional Deaths in NC Due to Controlled Substances 2003-2009 900 798 826 844 800 708 700 650 636 589 600 500 466 DEATHS 400 300 200 100 0 2003 2005 2007 2009 2010 Data Extrapolated. J anuary – J une Deaths = 422 Source: NC State M edical Examiner’s Office

  8. NC Admissions To Substance Abuse Treatment by % of Total 10 9 8 7 Other Opiates 6 Stimulants 5 4 Tranquilizers 3 Sedatives 2 1 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 TEDS DATA

  9. Controlled Substances Reporting System NCGS 90-113.70-76 • Passed in August 2005 • Reporting began July 2007 • Required all dispensers to report to a centralized data base • Reporting first year was 1x per month • Required reporting on the 15 th and 30 th per month (August 1, 2008) • Weekly reporting began 01/ 02/ 10

  10. CSRS - Who has Access? State Shall Release Data to: • Persons authorized to prescribe or dispense for the purposes of providing medical care for THEIR patients • A person requesting their own data • The 21 Special Agents of the SBI pursuant to a bona fide investigation • Licensing Boards with jurisdiction over health care professionals- pursuant to an ongoing investigation

  11. CSRS - Who has Access? (con’t) • Primary M onitoring Authorities from other states pursuant to an ongoing investigation • Division of M edical Assistance • DHHS must report “ Unusual Patterns of Prescribing” to the Attorney General – criteria set by a multidisciplinary advisory committee • Anonymous data for research and statistics • M edical Examiners (effective 8/ 9/ 09) • Practitioners may share & document (8/ 9/ 09)

  12. CSRS Data Overview • Over 53,500,000 prescriptions in the database (started July 1, 2007) • Approx. 17 million per year • Over 1,000,000 queries have been made of the system • Over 7400 dispensers and practitioners currently registered to use the system • Averaging 2200 queries per day

  13. CSRS Data J uly-December 2009 • 459,214 Individuals Received Prescriptions for Schedule II Drugs • 146,627,299 Doses (15.31 for each person in NC) • 1,306,915 Persons received RX for 255,359,099 Doses of Schedule II and Schedule III drugs • 2,488,186 persons received RX for 375,628,876 doses of Schedule II,III, and IV Drugs (39 doses for each person in NC - 27% population received at least 1 script)

  14. Trends Schedule II 40 ber of Patients 35 30 Sch II => 10&10 25 Sch II => 15&15 20 15 Linear (Sch II => um 10 10&10) 5 N 0 8 9 0 8 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 t d t d t s s s n n 1 1 1 2 2 Patients with M ultiple Prescribers and Dispensers Source: NC CSRS

  15. Trends Schedule II & III 180 ber of Patients 160 140 120 Sch II & III =>10 100 & 10 80 Sch II & III => 15 & 15 60 Num 40 20 0 1st 2008 2nd 2008 1st 2009 2nd 2009 1st 2010 Patients with M ultiple Prescribers and Dispensers Source: NC CSRS

  16. Trends Schedule II, III & IV 250 atients 200 Sch II, III & IV => ber of P 150 10 &10 Sch II, III & IV => 100 15 &15 um 50 N 0 1st 2008 1st 2009 1st 2010 2nd 2008 2nd 2009 Patients with M ultiple Prescribers and Dispensers Source: NC CSRS

  17. RECOM M ENDATIONS 1. Allow Law Enforcement Drug Investigation Units to Receive Information from the CSRS (But no Direct Access) • Special Software Available • M ust be pursuant to an Investigation • Attorney General Notification Required • SBI Diversion Unit Notification Required • Specialized Training Required

  18. Recommendations (con’t) 2. Require and Record Photo ID from Person picking up prescription 3. Require Physician Dispensed M edication to be Reported into CSRS. • Exclude Hospital ED • Exclude Veterinarians

  19. Recommendations (con’t) 4. Allow Delegated Accounts (Dr. or Pharmacist M ay designate someone in office to do CSRS look-up) • M ust be licensed personnel or Certified Pharmacy Tech • Prescriber or Pharmacist continues to have responsibility and liability

  20. Recommendations (con’t) 5. Change penalty for improper use of the system to a crime. M ajor Breach – Felony. M inor infraction – M isdemeanor 6. Adopt Interstate Compact to allow interstate sharing of information (to be released late 2010)

  21. Recommendations (con’t) 7. Explicitly Permit “Unsolicited Reporting” by DHHS to Prescribers and/ or Dispensers • Permit it but do not mandate • Allow it to be a report or an alert notification • Allow it up to the extent that resources are available • Hold the state immune for reporting or not reporting in good faith 8. Consider Closer Regulation of Pain Clinics

Recommend


More recommend