predictive risk awareness for
play

Predictive risk awareness for proactive management IETF92 Dallas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Predictive risk awareness for proactive management IETF92 Dallas Bruno Vidalenc, Laurent Ciavaglia 1 History Concept and mechanism presented at NMRG IETF89-London http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-nmrg-1.pdf Use


  1. Predictive risk awareness for proactive management IETF92 – Dallas Bruno Vidalenc, Laurent Ciavaglia 1

  2. History • Concept and mechanism presented at NMRG IETF89-London http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-nmrg-1.pdf • Use case presented at UCAN BoF IETF90- Toronto http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-ucan-2.pdf • Today: towards an ANIMA-compliant ASA? 2

  3. Mechanism recap feedback 3. Trigger actions Risk-Aware Routing Risk Level feedback Risk Level Adaptive Level of Risk Level Assessment Recovery Risk Level Adaptive OSPF Failure Detection 4. Learn Timers feedback Probes (e.g. T°) Load, Events, Traffic… 3

  4. Mechanism recap Risk-Aware Routing Risk Level Risk Level Adaptive Level of Risk Level Assessment Recovery Risk Level 1. Collect data Adaptive OSPF Failure Detection Timers Probes (e.g. T°) Load, Events, Traffic… 4

  5. Mechanism recap Risk-Aware Routing 2. Compute risk Risk Level Risk Level Adaptive Level of Risk Level Assessment Recovery Risk Level 1. Collect data Adaptive OSPF Failure Detection Timers Probes (e.g. T°) Load, Events, Traffic… 5

  6. Mechanism recap 3. Trigger actions Risk-Aware Routing 2. Compute risk Risk Level Risk Level Adaptive Level of Risk Level Assessment Recovery Risk Level 1. Collect data Adaptive OSPF Failure Detection Timers Probes (e.g. T°) Load, Events, Traffic… 6

  7. Mechanism recap feedback 3. Trigger actions Risk-Aware Routing 2. Compute risk Risk Level feedback Risk Level Adaptive Level of Risk Level Assessment Recovery Risk Level 1. Collect data Adaptive OSPF Failure Detection 4. Learn Timers feedback Probes (e.g. T°) Load, Events, Traffic… 7

  8. Notes • Learning to improve process accuracy, utility over time • Local – Local decision-based – Local device information/monitoring – Distributed execution • Global – Mitigate local instabilities – Deeper risk “understanding” thanks to correlation/context awareness – Local/global risk information/patterns for other mechanisms • Time window – Big (hours)  preventive maintenance (e.g. field interventions) – Small (seconds)  automatic mechanisms (restoration/protection, cold stand- by activation…) 8

  9. (tentative) Mapping to reference model 9

  10. (tentative) Mapping to reference model e.g. fault management strategy e.g. interactions w/ other (risk-aware) mechanisms (not mandatory) risk level Risk-aware Risk mechanism assessment triggers, commands sensing 10

  11. Discuss: ANIMA compliance/impact • Ability to anticipate on future network condition/context – a new capability of interest to many mechanisms • How to make it accessible and useful for other ASAs? – common components, place in the reference model, interfaces... • How to design a generic yet customizable functionality (via intent, capability-aware) and not replicate per function/service? • Common way(s) to connect to information sources… • Common way(s) to disseminate risk information to target functions/agents… • Common way(s) to learn/build knowledge but also store, query, process… • Interfaces to GDNP...? Specify GDNP objectives...? 11

Recommend


More recommend