poster highlights poster highlights clinical clinical
play

Poster highlights Poster highlights (clinical) (clinical) ICARO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Poster highlights Poster highlights (clinical) (clinical) ICARO 2009 ICARO 2009 April 29th April 29th Internal audit is part of your QA Internal audit is part of your QA system system A key element of internal A key element of


  1. Poster highlights Poster highlights (clinical) (clinical) ICARO 2009 ICARO 2009 April 29th April 29th

  2. Internal audit is part of your QA Internal audit is part of your QA system system � A key element of internal A key element of internal � audit is internal review of audit is internal review of clinical results (outcome clinical results (outcome studies). studies). � This allows to benchmark This allows to benchmark � with other centres. with other centres. � Differences can be Differences can be � investigated. investigated. � Good practice is confirmed Good practice is confirmed � � Research encourages Research encourages � good practice good practice

  3. Clinical data Clinical data � HIV patients (posters 101, 107) HIV patients (posters 101, 107) � � Brachytherapy Brachytherapy (103, 104) (103, 104) � � Uncommon cancers (83, 130) Uncommon cancers (83, 130) � � Clinical trials and series (98, 102,106, 108, 128) Clinical trials and series (98, 102,106, 108, 128) � � Biology & radiobiology (135, 138) Biology & radiobiology (135, 138) � � Radiotherapy technique (84, 86, 92, 126) Radiotherapy technique (84, 86, 92, 126) � � Paediatrics (82, 86) Paediatrics (82, 86) � � General (100, 120) General (100, 120) �

  4. HIV HIV E Oyekunle (Nigeria) P Siraprapasiri (Thailand) � 43 HIV positive 43 HIV positive � 23 pts 23 pts � � patients with cancer patients with cancer � CD4 count indeed CD4 count indeed � � Rate of recurrence and Rate of recurrence and drops during RT. drops during RT. � met’ ’s s increased increased met � Dose Dose- -dependant. dependant. � � Further Further � � Worse in aging pts and Worse in aging pts and � immunosuppression in in immunosuppression those without ART. those without ART. 40 % 40 % � Perhaps ART should Perhaps ART should � � CD4 count should be CD4 count should be � be part of RT. be part of RT. monitored monitored

  5. Brachytherapy Brachytherapy � Comparing Fletcher and ring applicator in Comparing Fletcher and ring applicator in � cervix cancer. cervix cancer. � Too much variability in dose distribution Too much variability in dose distribution � between consecutive fractions with Fletcher- - between consecutive fractions with Fletcher type applicator type applicator � Not seen with ring applicator, more Not seen with ring applicator, more � reproducible. reproducible. NA Laghari (Pakistan)

  6. Brachytherapy Brachytherapy � Cervix cancer 2nd cause of death. Cervix cancer 2nd cause of death. � � 70% inoperable (even less operated). 70% inoperable (even less operated). � � RT + HDR RT + HDR brachy brachy is used. is used. � � Cost of 1 HDR Ir192 source US$7.000 Cost of 1 HDR Ir192 source US$7.000 � � For an average of 29.5 insertions. For an average of 29.5 insertions. � � HDR unit use should be optimised (referral, HDR unit use should be optimised (referral, � other cancer) and X- -ray verification unit is ray verification unit is other cancer) and X needed. needed. H Mahmood (Pakistan)

  7. Uncommon cancer Uncommon cancer M De Melo (Brazil) DA Dawotola (Nigeria) � Cervix cancer <25y Cervix cancer <25y � Large breast cancer (> Large breast cancer (> � � 25 cm). 25 cm). � Series of 40 pts Series of 40 pts � � Mean age 34.5 y. Mean age 34.5 y. � � 14 in situ (do well) 14 in situ (do well) � � Radical surgery + CT Radical surgery + CT � � 26 invasive, 20 treated 26 invasive, 20 treated � + RT. + RT. with ERT+BT. with ERT+BT. � Separation > 22 cm. Separation > 22 cm. � � More than half had More than half had � disease progression � C0 60 treatment. C0 60 treatment. disease progression � during the treatment! during the treatment! � Skin tolerance detailed Skin tolerance detailed � � Only 60% 5yOS for Only 60% 5yOS for (36 % grade 3 & 4). (36 % grade 3 & 4). � stage I. stage I.

  8. Clinical trials & series Clinical trials & series � Tolerability of RT Tolerability of RT- -CT in cervix cancer (BCR CT in cervix cancer (BCR Devi Devi, , � Malaysia). Malaysia). � Managing a randomised trial (N Begum, Pakistan). Managing a randomised trial (N Begum, Pakistan). � � NPC in young patients (P NPC in young patients (P Kamnerdsupaphon Kamnerdsupaphon, , � Thailand). Thailand). � RCT in bone metastases (V RCT in bone metastases (V Sukthomia Sukthomia, Thailand). , Thailand). � � RT vs. RTCT in advanced rectum ca (R Engineer RT vs. RTCT in advanced rectum ca (R Engineer � India). India). � IMRT vs conventional RT in cervix ca (U IMRT vs conventional RT in cervix ca (U � Mahantshetty, India). , India). Mahantshetty

  9. 209 in 908 pts included in Peshawar Dr N Begum Problem: patients tend to leave before completion because of lack of education, poverty, homesickness, long treatment, side effects… Results: compliance 87.5% in 5#/w and 91.4% in 6#/w. 5y LC 41% vs. 28% 5y DSS 53% vs. 39% Cost-effective. Proactive measures to ensure compliance. Proactive measures to ensure follow-up

  10. 95 pts 124 sites 10x3 Gy (1) 2x8.5 Gy (2) Pain relief faster in arm 2

  11. Concurent chemoradiotherapy chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy in vs. radiotherapy in Concurent advanced unresectable unresectable rectum cancer rectum cancer advanced R Engineer (India) R Engineer (India) � 90 inoperable patients 90 inoperable patients � 60 randomised between randomised between 55 (%) 50 � RT � RT- -CT (45 CT (45 Gy Gy + + Capecitabine) ) Capecitabine 39,1 40 � RT (45 + 20 33 � RT (45 + 20 gy gy) ) operated 29,5 30 R0 � Normal side Normal side- -effects effects � CR 20 (nothing unusual) (nothing unusual) 10 9 � Statistical power? Statistical power? � 6,5 0 RT-CT RT

  12. � Interim analysis (audit) of toxicity in a RCT. Interim analysis (audit) of toxicity in a RCT. � � Interim analysis is useful; is usually done by Interim analysis is useful; is usually done by � an independent review committee and an independent review committee and unpublished (unless problems). unpublished (unless problems). � Weakens the validity and requires to Weakens the validity and requires to � α and β values (increase pt strengthen the α and β values (increase pt strengthen the number or reduce power). number or reduce power).

  13. � EBRT for NPC; BID vs. 1#/d in 66 pts. EBRT for NPC; BID vs. 1#/d in 66 pts. � � VEGF VEGF- -A and MVD staining. A and MVD staining. � � Intense staining correlates with better outcome in Intense staining correlates with better outcome in � NPC treated with BID EBRT (S Soetopo Soetopo, , NPC treated with BID EBRT (S Indonesia) Indonesia) 5120 pooled patients 38% conventional 62% hypofractionation α/β value uniform low: Argument for hypo#?

  14. RT techniques RT techniques � PTV coverage for breast ca with 2D and 3D 79% PTV coverage for breast ca with 2D and 3D 79% � vs. 93% coverage of PTV at the cost of more dose vs. 93% coverage of PTV at the cost of more dose to nl tissues (KW Boccaletti Boccaletti, Brazil) , Brazil) to nl tissues (KW � IMRT in IMRT in peadiatric peadiatric patients, only CNS. Concerns patients, only CNS. Concerns � regarding 2nd cancer (RC Villar Villar, Brazil). , Brazil). regarding 2nd cancer (RC � IMRT for functional lung avoidance, using IMRT for functional lung avoidance, using � perfusion SPECT (K Lavrenkov Lavrenkov, Israel, India, UK). , Israel, India, UK). perfusion SPECT (K � IMRT + IGRT ( IMRT + IGRT (tomo tomo) in pancreas and bile duct ) in pancreas and bile duct � cancer (R Enegineer Enegineer, India). , India). cancer (R

  15. Clinical series Clinical series � 204 cervix ca pts treated in Sarawak with RT 204 cervix ca pts treated in Sarawak with RT- -CT. CT. � Acute adverse effects usual (only grade 1 & 2 Acute adverse effects usual (only grade 1 & 2 RTOG) (BCR Devi, Malaysia). 71% early stage? RTOG) (BCR Devi, Malaysia). 71% early stage? � NPC in 16 pts (10 NPC in 16 pts (10- -18y), 11with locally advanced 18y), 11with locally advanced � (III, IVa IVa, , IVb IVb). RT ). RT- -CT CT (III, (V Sukhtomia Sukhtomia, Thailand) , Thailand) (V

  16. Paediatric series Paediatric series childen can be cured! can be cured! childen � Example of PPP to solve Example of PPP to solve acess acess to RT to RT � cancer treatment in children. Centralisation cancer treatment in children. Centralisation of children important. Mean estimated of children important. Mean estimated cost/patient 9.772 US$ (AFY Centrone Centrone, , cost/patient 9.772 US$ (AFY Brazil) Brazil) � IMRT in children. IMRT in children. �

  17. Use of RT in lung Use of RT in lung cancer cancer � Audit of 565 lung ca Audit of 565 lung ca � treatments. treatments. � Use of RT 43%. Use of RT 43%. � � Maori Maori’ ’s s under under � represented. represented. � High early mortality. High early mortality. � � High number declining High number declining � care. care. G Stevens, NZ

Recommend


More recommend